Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T16:40:46.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Georgics, the Mysteries and the Muses at Rome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Alex Hardie
Alex Hardie
Affiliation:
Oriel College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a paper published nearly fifty years ago, Piero Scazzoso traced what he took to be a pattern of mystery allusions in the Georgics. Reflections of telestic initiation and allied concepts of resurrection and salvation were then identified in the Orpheus and Aristaeus episodes in Book 4. Later studies in this area focused variously on the first proem, on Eleusinian references in the ‘farmer's arma’ (1.162–8), on the role of Proserpina, and on the ‘mystic’ beatitudes at the end of the second book. Most recently, Llewelyn Morgan has offered an analysis of the relevance of mystery cult to understanding Vergil's conception of the physical universe and its underlying principles, again with particular reference to the fourth book.

With the benefit of this considerable body of work, we are well placed to ask whether Roman readers' understanding of the poem could have been enriched by acquaintance with telestic concepts and procedures. Christine Perkell detected the ‘primacy of mystery’ in the tension between the poet's didactic praecepta and his aspiration to god given knowledge, a reading which might encourage more extended enquiry into the revelatory character of the Georgics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Second Series) , Volume 48 , 2002 , pp. 175 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Badian, E. (1972) ‘Ennius and his friends’, in Ennius, Fondation Hardt Entretiens 17, Geneva, 151–208.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R. (1975) ‘Athen, Augustus und die eleusinischen Mysterien’, MDAI(A) 90, 233–7.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1955) ‘Fulvius Nobilior et le dieu ineffable’, RP 29, 172–92.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1972) Der Anspruch des Dichters in Vergils Georgika, Impulse der Forschung 8, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1969) ‘Das Proömium des Parmenides und die Katabasis des Pythagoras’, Phronesis 14, 1–30.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1983) Homo necans: the anthropology of ancient Greek sacrificial ritual and myth, trans. Bing, P., Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1987) Ancient mystery cults, Harvard.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1995) ‘Horace's first Roman ode (3.1)’, PLLS 8, 91–142.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. S. (1982) ‘Initiation and the role of Aristaens in Georgics 4’, Ramus II, 105–15.Google Scholar
Chomarat, J. (1974) ‘L'Initiation d'Aristée’, REL 52, 185–207.Google Scholar
Cramer, R. (1998) Vergils Weltsicht: Optimismus und Pessimismus in Vergils Georgika, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, M. W. (1998) ‘Poets as initiates in the mysteries: Euphorion, Philicus and Posidippus’, A&A 44, 49–77.Google Scholar
Dillery, J. (1999) ‘Aesop, Isis and the Heliconian Muses’, CP 94, 268–80.Google Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1996) Archaic Roman religion, trans. Krapp, P., Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Eisler, R. (1925) Orphisch-dionysische Mysteriengedanken in der christlichen Antike, Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's ‘Georgics’ and the traditions of ancient epic: the art of allusion in literary history, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Frentz, W. (1967) Mythologisches in Vergils Georgica, Meisenheim an Glan.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (1994) Myth and poetry in Lucretius, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2000) Virgil on the nature of things, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, F. (1974) Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens in vorhellenistischer Zeit, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, F. (1998) (ed.) Ansichten griechischer Rituale: Geburtstag-Symposium für Walter Burkert, Stuttgart and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. N. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.) (1997) The Roman cultural revolution, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (1996) ‘Pindar, Castalia and the Muses of Delphi (the sixth Paean)’, PLLS 9, 219–57.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (1998) ‘Juvenal, the Phaedrus and the truth about Rome’, CQ 48, 234–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A. (2000) ‘Pindar's “Theban” cosmogony (the first Hymn)’, BICS 44, 19–40.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (forthcoming) ‘Muses and mysteries’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds.).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: cosmos and imperium, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. and Obbink, D. (1986) ‘Vergil, Georgics 136–39 and the Barcelona Alcestis (P. Bare. Inv. No. 158–161) 62–65: Demeter in the Underworld’, ZPE 63, 75–81.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. A. (1977) ‘Eurydice and Proserpina in the Georgics’, TAPA 107, 161–72.Google Scholar
Jones, R. M. (1926) ‘Posidonius and the flight of the mind through the universe’, CP 21, 97–113.Google Scholar
Kerényi, C. (1967) Eleusis: archetypal image of mother and daughter, trans. Mannheim, R., Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraggerud, E. (1998) ‘Vergil announcing the Aeneid: on Georgics 3.1–48’, in Stahl (1998) 1–20.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (1999) Initiating Dionysus: ritual and theatre in Aristophanes’ Frogs, Oxford.Google Scholar
Le Bonniec, H. (1958) Le Culte de Cérès à Rome: des origines à la fin de la république, Paris.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1967) ‘Hercules at Eleusis’, Maia n.s. 19, 206–29.Google Scholar
Luck, G. (1969) ‘Vergil and the mystery religions’, TAPA 100, 147–66.Google Scholar
Lundström, S. (1976) ‘Der Eingang des Proömiums zum dritten Buche der Georgica’, Hermes 104, 163–91.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1991) A lexicon of ancient Latin etymologies, Leeds.Google Scholar
Martina, M. (1981) ‘Aedes Herculis Musarum’, Dialoghi di Archeologia n.s. 3.1, 49–68.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (1999) Patterns of redemption in Virgil's Georgics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds.) (forthcoming). Music and the Muses: the culture of mousike in the classical Athenian city, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Virgil: Georgics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2001) Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, Leeds.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1913) Agnostos theos, Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1926) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buck VI (3rd edn.), Berlin.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. J. (1996) True names: Virgil and the Alexandrian tradition of etymological wordplay, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Paratore, E. (1977) ‘L'episodio di Orfeo’, in Atti del Convegno virgiliario sul bimillenario delle Georgiche, Naples, 9–36.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. G. (1989) The poet's truth: a study of the poet in Virgil's Georgics, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. (1987) Mysterienterminologie bei Platon, Philon und Klemens von Alexandrien, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedweg, C. (1998) ‘Initiation – Tod – Unterwelt’: Beobachtungen zur Kommunikationssituation und narrativen Technik der orphisch-bakchischen Goldblättchen, in Graf, (ed.) (1998) 359–98.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1987) Vergil's elements: physics and poetry in the Georgics, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauron, G. (1994) Quis deum: l'expression plastique des idéologies politiques et religieuse à Rome a la fin de la république et au debut du principat, BEFAR 285, Rome.Google Scholar
Scazzoso, P. (1956) ‘Riflessi misterici nelle “Georgiche” di Vergilio’, Paideia 11, 5–28.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1997) ‘The boundaries of knowledge in Virgil's Georgics’, in Habinek, and Schiesaro, (eds.) 63–89.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1976) ‘On the origins of satyric drama’, Maia 28, 209–22.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1977–1978) ‘The “Hyporchema” of Pratinas’, Maia 29–30, 81–94.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1981) ‘Dionysiac drama and Dionysiac mysteries’, CQ 31, 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. (1986) ‘Immortality, salvation and the elements’, HSCP 90, 1–26.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1994) ‘Sophocles and the mysteries’, Hermes 122, 275–88.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1968) Studia Enniana, London.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Quintus Ennius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1947) ‘Eratosthenes' Erigone: a reconstruction’, TAPA 78, 252–75.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) (1998) Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan epic and political context, London.Google Scholar
Tamm, B. (1961) ‘Le Temple des Muses à Rome’, Opusc. Rom. 3, 157–67.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1983) ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman poetry’, CQ 33, 92–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil: Georgics, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and his texts: studies in intertextuality, Michigan.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2001) Virgil and the Augustan reception, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1947) ‘Equality and justice in early Greek cosmologies’, CP 42, 156–78.Google Scholar
Wender, D. S. (1969) ‘Resurrection and the fourth Georgic’, AJP 90, 424–36.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1969) The Georgics of Virgil: a critical survey, Cambridge (repr. Bristol 1997).Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A. (1998) ‘Wine rituals, Maenads and Dionysian fire’, PLLS 10, 157–68.Google Scholar
Wissowa, G. (1912) Religion und Kultus der Römer (2nd edn.), Munich.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1971) Persephone, Oxford.Google Scholar