Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T14:18:07.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tools, Grammar and the Archaeology of Cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Thomas Wynn
Thomas Wynn
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Colorado at Colorado SpringsColorado Springs, CO 80933-7150, U.S.A..
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Use of archaeological evidence in discussions of the origin and evolution of grammar has proved unconvincing largely because of undeveloped theoretical assumptions about the cognitive connection between language and tool behaviour. This paper examines the cognitive basis of tool use and tool making and concludes that there is no sound theoretical basis for inferring grammatical abilities from prehistoric stone tools. Our knowledge concerning the cognitive basis of tool behaviour can, however, be used to document evolutionary developments in hominid cognition. Analysis of early biface culture, for example, reveals a cognitive complexity greater than that demonstrable for the earlier Oldowan or for modern apes.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , October 1991 , pp. 191 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, J., 1944. The Navajo and Pueblo Silversmith. Norman: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., 1979. The Emergence of Symbols. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C., & Boesch, H., 1990. Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica 54, 86–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bower, J.R.F., 1977. Attributes of Oldowan and lower Acheulean tools: ‘Tradition’ and design in the early Lower Paleolithic. South African Archaeological Bulletin 32, 113–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J., 1983. Child's talk Learning to use language. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J., 1985. Vygotsky: a historical and conceptual perspective, in Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, ed. Wertsch, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: MoutonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., 1980. Rules and representations. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3, 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., & Noble, W., 1989. The archaeology of perception: traces of depiction and language. Current Anthropology 30, 125–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., & Noble, W., 1990. Tools, humans, and evolution: the relevance of the Upper Palaeolithic. Pre-circulated paper for the Wenner-Gren conference ‘Tools, Language, and Intelligence; Evolutionary Implications’, CascaisGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, J.W.D., & Keller, C.M., 1982. Taskonomy: a practical approach to knowledge structures. American Ethnologist 5, 763–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M.L., 1975. Symbolic sets. Paper presented in the symposium ‘Toward an ideational dimension in archaeology’ (Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Dallas)Google Scholar
Gatewood, J., 1985. Actions speak louder than words, in Directions in Cognitive Anthropology, ed. Dougherty, J.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 199–220Google Scholar
Gibson, K., 1990. New perspectives on instincts and intelligence: Brain size and the emergence of hierarchical mental constructional skills, in ‘Language’ and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–128Google Scholar
Gowlett, J., 1984. Mental abilities of early man: a look at some hard evidence, in Hominid Evolution and Community Ecology: Prehistoric Human Adaptation in Biological Perspective, ed. Foley, R.. London: Academic Press, 167–92Google Scholar
Greenfield, P., 1990. Language, tools and brain: the development and evolution of hierarchically organized sequential behaviour. Pre-circulated paper for the Wenner-Gren conference ‘Tools, Language, and Intelligence: Evolutionary Implications’, CascaisGoogle Scholar
Isaac, G.L., 1967. The stratigraphy of the Peninj Group - early Middle Pleistocene formations west of Lake Natron, Tanzania, in Background to Evolution in Africa, eds. Bishop, W. & Clark, J.. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Jones, P., 1981. Experimental implement manufacture and use: A case study from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, in The Emergence of Man, eds. Young, J., Jope, E., & Oakley, K.. London: The Royal Society and the British Academy, 189–95Google Scholar
Keller, J., & Keller, C, 1991. Thinking and Acting with Iron. The Beckman Institute Cognitive Science Technical Report CS–91–08 (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)Google Scholar
Kitahara-Frisch, J., 1978. Stone tools as indicators of linguistic ability in early man. Kagaku Kisoron Gakkai Annals 5, 101–9Google Scholar
Leakey, M., 1971. Olduvai Gorge, Vol. 3: Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960–1963. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, P., 1984. The Biology and Evolution of Language. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, P., 1990. Rule-governed processes and brains: speech, syntax, and tool making. Pre-circulated paper for the Wenner-Gren conference ‘Tools, Language and Intelligence: Evolutionary Implications’, CascaisGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, E.M., 1981. The projectile capabilities of an Acheulian handaxe from Olorgesailie. Current Anthropology 22, 76–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., 1960. The Psychology of Intelligence, trans. M. Piercy & D. Berlyne. Totawa: Littlefield, Adams & Co.Google Scholar
Potts, R., 1988. Early Hominid Activities at Olduvai Gorge. New York: AldineGoogle Scholar
Reichard, G., 1934. Spider Woman: A Story of Navajo Weavers and Chanters. Glorietta, New Mexico: Rio Grande PressGoogle Scholar
Straub, W.F., & Williams, J.M., 1984. Cognitive Sports Psychology. Lansing, New York: Sport Science AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Toth, N., 1985. The Oldowan reassessed: A closer look at early stone artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 12, 101–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J., Modjeska, N., & Hipuya, I., 1977. Group definitions and mental templates, in Stone Tools as Cultural Markers, ed. Wright, R.V.S.. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 380–90Google Scholar
Wynn, T., 1979. The intelligence of later Acheulean hominids. Man 14, 379–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T., 1989. The Evolution of Spatial Competence. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T., 1990. Natural history and the superorganic in the study of tool behavior, in Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Behavior: Comparative Perspectives, eds. Bekoff, M. & Jamieson, D.. Boulder: Westview Press, 98–117Google Scholar
Wynn, T., & McGrew, W.C., 1989. An ape's view of the Oldowan. Man 24, 383–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar