Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T20:50:28.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Organization of Industrial Research as a Network Activity: Agricultural Research at Philips in the 1930s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

F. Kees Boersma
F. Kees Boersma
Affiliation:
F. KEES BOERSMA is Assistant professor in the Department of Culture, Organization, and Management of theVrije UniversiteitAmsterdam in the Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Business historians have shown the importance of industrial research in the process of innovation. Most have focused on the industrial research departments themselves. Less attention has been paid to the position of these departments within research networks outside the firm. This article explores the story of networking at the Dutch company Philips & Co. during the interwar period. Gilles Hoist, director of Philips's Research Department at the time, became involved in an agricultural research network that comprised growers, university scientists, and the Dutch government. These networks were essential for Philips's success and provided an opportunity for the company's researchers to keep in touch with scientific circles.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , Summer 2004 , pp. 255 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Mokyr, Joel, The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress (New York, 1990)Google Scholar; Mowery, David C. and Rosenberg, Nathan, Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth (Cambridge, U.K., 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Nelson, Richard R., The Sources of Economic Growth (Cambridge, U.K., 1996), 114–18Google Scholar. The knowledge-creation process in R&D settings has more than once been described as the heart of the whole complex of innovation. See Freeman, Christopher and Soete, Luc, The Economics of Industrial Innovation (London, 1997). 5Google Scholar; and Nelson, Sources of Economic Growth, part 3.

2 Dennis, Michael A., “Accounting for Research: New Histories of Corporate Laboratories and the Social History of American Science,” Social Studies of Science 17 (1987): 479–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Dennis, Michael A., “Historiography of Science: An American Perspective,” in Science in the Twentieth Century, eds. Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique (Amsterdam, 1997)Google Scholar.

3 Hounshell, David A., “The Evolution of Industrial Research in the United States,” in Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research at the End of an Era, eds. Rosenbloom, Richard S. and Spencer, William J. (Boston, 1996), 13–84Google Scholar.

4 For a recent discussion of innovation in Dutch firms, and especially Philips, see Mila Davids, “Knowledge-Business Networks in the Netherlands: The Case of Philips.” Paper presented at the Business History Conference on Networks, Le Creusot, France, 17–19 June 2004.

5 Scott, W. Richard, Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1998)Google Scholar; Kildruf, Martin and Tsai, Wenpin, Social Networks and Organizations (London, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See Arnoldus, Doreen, Family, Family Firm, and Strategy (Amsterdam, 2002)Google Scholar, in which she refers to Granovetter, Mark, “Economic Institutions as Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis,” Acta Sociologica 35 (1992): 3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Granovetter, Mark, “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology 78, no. 6 (1973): 1360–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 The empirical part concerning the history of the Philips NatLab is based upon Boersma, Kees, Inventing Structures for Industrial Research: A History of the Philips Nat.Lab., 1914–1946 (Amsterdam, 2002)Google Scholar.

8 The content of this section is based upon two books (in a series of five) on the history of Philips: Heerding, Andries, The History of N.V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken. Vol. 2: A Company of Many Parts (New York, 1988)Google Scholar; and Blanken, Ivo, The History of Philips Electronics N.V. Vol. 3: The Development of N.V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken into a Major Electrical Group (Zaltbommel, 1999)Google Scholar. Both books, originally written in Dutch, have been translated into English.

9 Sluyterman, Keetie, Kerende kansen: Het Nederlandse bedrijfsleven in de twintigste eeuw (Amsterdam, 2003)Google Scholar.

10 Dutch technology historians have analyzed the transition to a highly integrated society through national schooling systems, transportation, electrification, communication, and a growing sector of modern industrial firms. The Netherlands went through a process of “modernization,” which featured demographic transition, urbanization, industrialization, secularization, and bureaucratization. See: Davids, Karel, “Recasting the History of Technology in the Netherlands,” Traxtrix 5 (1993): 161–71Google Scholar; and Lente, Dick van, “Technology in Dutch Society during the Nineteenth Century,” Tractrix 2 (1990): 127–39Google Scholar.

11 Veldman, Hans, Innovaties in de lampenfabricage bij Philips, 1900–1980 (Eindhoven, 1994)Google Scholar.

12 Heerding, The History of N.V. Philips, ch. 3.

13 Sluyterman, Keetie E. and Winkelman, Hélène J. M., “The Dutch Family Firm Confronted with Chandler's Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, 1890–1940,” Business History 35 (1993): 152–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Lintsen, Harry W., “Kennisverwerving in de Nederlandse industrie in de 19e eeuw,” in Werkplaatsen van wetenschap en techniek: Industriële en academische laboratoria in Nederland, 1860–1940, eds. Visser, Rob and Hakfoort, Casper (Amsterdam, 1987), 175–89Google Scholar.

15 See Faber, Jasper, “Het Nederlandse Innovatiesysteem, 1870–1990,” NEHA Jaarboek 66 (2003): 208–32Google Scholar.

16 The earlier patent legislation had been abolished in 1869. See Schiff, Eric, Industrialization without National Patents: The Netherlands 1869–1912, Switzerland 1850–1907 (Princeton, 1971)Google Scholar; and Gerzon, F., Nederland, een volk van struikrovers? De herinvoering van de Nederlandse octroooiwet (1869–1912) (The Hague, 1986), 1–8Google Scholar.

17 See articles (without title) in De Ingenieur, 1912, vol. 27, no. 20: 409–13Google Scholar; De Ingenieur, 1912, vol. 27, no. 22: 479Google Scholar; De Ingenieur, 1912, vol. 27, no. 23: 499–505Google Scholar; De Ingenieur, 1912, vol. 27, no. 36: 734Google Scholar.

18 The Phoebus International Incandescent Lamp Cartel was a Swiss corporation that set the rules, controlled prices, regulated sales and implemented policy. It had established a testing laboratory to ensure the product quality of its members. See Heerding, The History of N.V. Philips; and Jones, Geoffrey, The Evolution of International Business: An Introduction (London, 1996)Google Scholar.

19 Holst, Gilles, “Industrielaboratoria.” Inaugural speech given in Leiden in 1930 (The Hague, 1930), 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Philips Company Archives/Jaarverslagen Natuurkundig Laboratorium (hereafter PCA/NL), Annual Reports.

21 A remark made by Hoist in a proposal relating to the reorganization of the physics laboratory. Quote is from Blanken, The Development of N.V. Philips.

22 See for this theme Kranakis, Eda, “Hybrid Careers and the Interaction of Science and Technology,” in Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age: New Perspectives on the Science-Technology Relationship, eds. Kroes, Peter and Bakker, Martijn (Dordrecht, 1992)Google Scholar.

23 This dynamic has been beautifully described in the series on the history of technology in the Netherlands. See Baggen, Peter, Faber, Jasper, and Homburg, Ernst, “Opkomst van een kennismaatschappij,” in Techniek in Nederland in de Twintigste Eeuw: Deel VII Techniek en Modernisering, ed. Schot, Johan (Zutphen, 2003), 141–73Google Scholar.

24 See Ernst Homburg's inaugural speech, “Speuren op de tast: Een historische kijk op industriële en universitaire research,” given on the occasion of his appointment to full professorship at the University of Maastricht on 31 Oct. 2003 and published by the University of Maastricht in 2003.

25 For the history of Applied Physics at Delft, see also Kamp, A. F., ed., De Technnische Hogeschool te Delft, 1905–1955 ('s Gravenhage, 1955), 281–3Google Scholar; Kronig, R., “De opleiding in de technische natuurkunde in Nederland,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde 37, no. 7 (1971): 186–8Google Scholar; Aarts, P., Dries, W., and Spierings, F., “Apparatenbouwers of wetenschappers: De eerste natuurkundige ingenieurs,” Intermediair 17, no. 36 (1981): 55–63Google Scholar; Kuijpers, Wil, De Technisch Physische Dienst en de Electronenmicroscopie (Eindhoven, 1987), 10–13Google Scholar; and Baudet, Henri, De lange weg naar de Technische Universiteit Delft I: De Delftse ingenieursschool en haar voorgeschiedenis (The Hague, 1992), 269, 462–7Google Scholar; and De lange weg naar de Technische Universiteit Delft II: Verantwoording, registers, tabellen, namenlijsten en bijlagen (The Hague, 1993), 677–81Google Scholar.

26 “Laboratorium voor Technische Physica T.H. Delft: Herdenking, 1930–'40,” De Ingenieur 55, no. 50 (1940): A448Google Scholar.

27 PCA/NL 327. Stichting Bio-Physica. Minutes of the first official meeting of the Stichting voor Biophysica, 25 Nov. 1931.

28 PCA/NL 324. Bestralingslampen. Verdere ontwikkeling van den verkoop van Ultrasolapparaten van ir. Verff, 11 Dec. 1931.

29 See Boersma, Kees, “Tensions within an Industrial Research Laboratory: The Case of the X-ray Department of the Philips Research Laboratory between the Two World Wars,” Enterprise and Society 4 (Mar. 2003): 65–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 PCA/NL 546. Plantenbestraling. Letter from Dr. J. W M. Roodenburg to Gilles Holst, Baarn, 18 July 1928.

31 Roodenburg wrote a thesis about the relation of oxygen to humus and plant rot. See Roodenburg, J. W. M, Zuurstofgebrek in den grond in verband met wortelrot (Baarn, 1927)Google Scholar.

32 See Canham, A. E., Artificial Light in Horticulture (Eindhoven, 1966)Google Scholar. Not investigated in this paper, but worth mentioning here, is that research into artificial lighting for agriculture also took place at other industrial companies, such as General Electric. In the first decade of the twentieth century, GE's electrotechnical wizard Charles Proteus Steinmetz experimented with the effects of lighting on the growth of plants in a little greenhouse. See Schenectady Museum Archives, Hammond File, L 5118; and Gorowitz, Bernard and Wise, George, eds., The General Electric Story, 1876–1986: A Photohistory. Part 2: The Steinmetz Era, 1892–1923 (Schenectady, N.Y., 1989), 38Google Scholar. Later, this agricultural research became more serious within GE. See Kranz, F. H. and Kranz, J. L., Gardening Indoors under Lights (New York, 1957)Google Scholar. Like Philips, GE was searching for new markets for incandescent lamps—the market niche of gardeners seemed to be a promising one. As far as specific research into artificial lighting is concerned, Philips and GE did not exchange information—both firms operated independently (and in different markets) in this case. On a more general level, we can find similarities in the way both firms developed structures for industrial research. However, both companies' R&D managers developed local strategies for research activities. See Boersma, Kees, “Structural Ways to Embed a Research Laboratory into the Company: A Comparison between Philips and General Electric,” History and Technology 19, no.2 (2003): 109–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 See: Höstermann, G., Versuche mit Neonlicht (Dahlem, 1918)Google Scholar and Blaauw, A. H., Die Perzeption der Lichtes (Utrecht, 1909)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the context of the biological research activities at the Dutch universities, see van Berkel, Klaas, van Helden, Albert and Palm, Lodewijk, A History of Science in the Netherlands (Leiden, 1999), 183–9Google Scholar; Faasse, Patricia E., Experiments in Growth (Amsterdam, 1994)Google Scholar, ch. 3.

34 PCA/NL 546. Plantenbestraling. Letter from Roodenburg to Holst, 3 Sept. 1928. Letter from Roodenburg to Oosterhuis, 17 Sept. 1928.

35 PCA 881. Contract file 940. Letter from Van Walsem, secretary of the Philips Board of Directors to Roodenburg, 19 Sept. 1928.

36 Ibid.

37 Maltha, D. J., Honderd jaar landbouwkundig onderzoek in Nederland, 1876–1976 (Wageningen, 1976)Google Scholar. Also see Gedenkboek uitgegeven bij het vijftigjarig bestaan der Rijkslandbouwproefstations, 1927 ('s Gravenhage, 1927)Google Scholar; and Vijverberg, A. J., Glastuinbouw in ontwikkeling: Beschouwingen over de sector en de beïnvloeding ervan door de wetenschap (Delft, 1996)Google Scholar. At the same time, these experimental stations contributed to the application of scientific findings of the food industry. See van Otterloo, Anneke H., “Nieuwe producten, schakels en regimes, 1890–1920,” in Techniek in Nederland in de Twintigste Eeuw: Deel III Landbouw, Voeding, ed. Schot, Johan (Zutphen, 2000), 254Google Scholar. Indirectly, these stations influenced the food supply of the Dutch consumer. See van Otterloo, Anneke H., “Voeding in verandering,” in Techniek in Nederland in de Twintigste Eeuw: Deel III Landbouw, Voeding, ed. Schot, Johan (Zutphen, 2000), 242–5Google Scholar.

38 ARA Deelarchief 2.11.09, Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Landbouw, 1815–1966, Bestanddeel 21 Lijst van officiële personen, instellingen en verenigingen op land-en tuinbouwgebied 1914–1933 (a list of key persons and the main institutes that participated in the Dutch agricultural sector). See also 25 Jaar Tuinbouw—onderwijs—voorlichting—onderzoek in het Zuid-Hollands Glasdistrict, 1924–1949: Jubileum-uitgave aangeboden aan Ir J. M. Riemens ter gelegenheid van het 25-jarig directeurschap van de Proeftuin Zuid-Hollands Glasdistrict (Amsterdam, 1949), 139–43Google Scholar. Harro Maat describes the features of the Dutch argicultural innovation system in “Het innovatiesysteem voor de Nederlandse landbouw,” NEHA Jaarboek 66 (2003): 233–62Google Scholar.

39 “The Westland” is part of the province of Zuid Holland (South Holland), in the western part of the Netherlands. In this part of the Netherlands there were, and still are, a lot of greenhouses.

40 See also 25 Jaar Tuinbouw, 139–43.

41 PCA/NL 545. Plantenbestraling. Report of Riemens, Proeftuin Westland Naaldwijk, 9 Feb. 1931.

42 Verbong, Geert, “Energie,” in Techniek in Nederland in de Twintigste Eeuw. Deel II Delfstoffen, Energie, Chemie, ed. Schot, Johan (Zutphen, 2000), 113–267Google Scholar.

43 PCA/NL 544. Plantenbestraling. Letter from J. C. van Staveren on behalf of the VDEN to the Philips Board of Directors, 27 Jan. 1931.

44 PCA/NL 327. Stichting Bio-Physica. Letter from Professor Dr. E. Gorter and Professor Dr. H. B. Dorgelo, 2 0 Apr. 1931; and letter from Dr. E. H. Reerink to Professor Dr. E. Gorter and Professor Dr. H. B. Dorgelo, 24 Apr. 1931.

45 PCA/NL 327. Stichting Bio-Physica. Letter from Professor Dr. E. Gorter and Professor Dr. H. B. Dorgelo to Hoist, 15 May 1931; and Ontwerp Statuten voor de Stichting voor Bio-Physica, May 1931.

46 PCA/NL 546. Plantenbestraling. Letter from Zecher to Roodenburg, 19 Nov. 1932; and letter from Zecher to Roodenburg, 2 July 1934.

47 der Veen, R. van and Meijer, G., Light and Plant Growth (Eindhoven, 1959), 130–5Google Scholar.

48 PCA/NL 546. Plantenbestraling. Letter from Zecher to Roodenburg, 20 Apr. 1931.

49 PCA/NL 517. Plantenbestraling. Kunstmatige Plantenbelichting in Nederland. A Report from Dr. Roodenburg, June 1937.

50 Roodenburg, J. W. M. and Zecher, G., “Plantenbestraling met Neonlicht,” Philips Technisch Tijdschrift 1, no. 7 (1936): 193–9.Google Scholar

51 Roodenburg, J. W. M., “Als de zon ons in de steek laat,” Natuur en Techniek 1 (1931): 2769Google Scholar and Roodenburg, J. W. M., “Rood licht voor kasplanten,” Weekblad voor de Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Tuinbouw en Plantkunde 28 (1934), esp. p. 8Google Scholar.

52 PCA/NL 545. Resultaten verkregen met den Philips Plantenbestraler. Vroege bloei— Rijkere oogst, Afdeling Industrie Centraal Bureau voor Documentatie, 15 Sept. 1934.

53 A design of a windowsill created by the architect Ir. P.H.N. Briër is discussed in der Harst, B. Roodenburg-Van, “Het bloemenvenster met Neonlicht,” Floralia, Weekblad voor bloem en tuin 57, no. 38 (1936)Google Scholar.

54 van Zanden, Jan Luiten, “The Dance Round the Gold Standard: Economic Policy in the Depression of the 1930s,” in van Zanden, Jan Luiten, ed., The Economic Development of The Netherlands since 1870 (Cheltenham, 1996)Google Scholar.

55 Blanken, History of Philips, 362–8.

56 PCA/NL 546. Plantenbestraling. Letter from Roodenburg to Holst, 25 Nov. 1936.

57 Roodenburg's opinion that the Philips's salesmen could not do justice to their promises was shared by Riemens's agricultural experimental station. See 25 Jaar Tuinbouw –onderwijs –voorlichting –onderzoek in het Zuid-Hollands Glasdistrict 1924–1949. Jubileumuitgave aangeboden aan Ir J.M. Riemens ter gelegenheid van het 25-jarig directeurschap van de Proeftuin Zuid-Hollands Glasdistrict (Amsterdam, 1949), 139–43Google Scholar, esp. 140.