Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T00:25:27.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Production Practices and Chicago's Automotive Industry, 1900–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

Robert Lewis
Robert Lewis
Affiliation:
ROBERT LEWIS is associate professor of geography at the University of Toronto. He thanks three anonymous reviewers and people at several conferences for their very useful comments on various drafts of this paper. He also acknowledges the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for its financial support.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chicago's large, diverse automotive industry specialized in truck, bus, and taxicab assembly, as well as automotive-parts manufacture, in the first decades of the twentieth century. From having just a handful of companies before World War I, by the mid 1920s Chicago grew to include more than 600 firms that were producing a wide assortment of automotiverelated products. This large, successful industry emerged out of two sets of advantages: First, Chicago's well-developed production factors—ranging from relatively advanced transportation and industrial facilities to a large labor force and an effective entrepreneurial business class—promoted industrial growth. Second, the automotive industry's production practices, elaborate division of labor, and intense set of interfirm relations encouraged metropolitan expansion. Even though the city's firms functioned both regionally and nationally, they were also deeply embedded within a local world of innovation, interaction, networks, financing, and servicing. Further adding to these advantages was Chicago's distinctive geography, which enabled a dense complex of linked, interrelated firms to flourish and contributed to the automotive industry's success before 1930.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , Winter 2003 , pp. 611 - 638
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Farber, David, Sloan Rules: Alfred P. Sloan and the Triumph of General Motors (Chicago, 2002)Google Scholar; Nevins, Allan and Hill, Frank, Ford: Expansion and Challenge, 1915-1933 (New York, 1957)Google Scholar.

2 Banham, Reyner, A Concrete Atlantis: U.S. Industrial Building and European Modern Architecture, 1900-1925 (Cambridge, Mass., 1986)Google Scholar; Biggs, Lindy, The Rational Factory: Architecture, Technology and Work in America's Age of Mass Production (Baltimore, 1996)Google Scholar; Hildebrand, Grant, Designing for Industry: The Architecture of Albert Kahn (Cambridge, Mass., 1974)Google Scholar.

3 Hooker, Clarence, Life in the Shadows of the Crystal Palace, 1910-1927: Ford Workers in the Model T Era (Bowling Green, Ohio, 1997)Google Scholar; Lichtenstein, Nelson and Meyer, Stephen, eds., On the Line: Essays in the History of Auto Work (Urbana, Ill., 1989)Google Scholar; Meyer, Stephen, The Five Dollar Day: Labor Management and Social Control in the Ford Motor Company (Albany, N.Y., 1981)Google Scholar; Feldman, Richard and Betzold, Michael, eds., End of the Line: Autoworkers and the American Dream (Urbana, Ill., 1990)Google Scholar; Lewis, Thomas, Divided Highways: Building the Interstate Highways, Transforming American Life (New York, 1997)Google Scholar.

4 Hounshell, David, From the American System to Mass Production, 1800-1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States (Baltimore, 1984)Google Scholar; Nevins and Hill, Ford.

5 Rubenstein, James, The Changing U.S. Auto Industry: A Geographical Analysis (London, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Conzen, Michael, “The Progress of American Urbanism, 1860-1930,” in North America: The Historical Geography of a Changing Continent, eds. Mitchell, Robert and Groves, Paul (Totowa, N.J., 1987), 347–70Google Scholar; David Meyer, “The National Integration of Regional Economies, 1860-1920,” in North America, 321-46; Scranton, Philip, Endless Novelty: Specialty Production an American Industrialization, 1865-1925 (Princeton, N.J., 1997)Google Scholar.

7 Bloomfield, Gerald, “Shaping the Character of the City: The Automobile Industry and Detroit, 1900-1920,” Michigan Quarterly Review 25 (1986): 167–81Google Scholar; Zunz, Olivier, The Changing Face of Inequality: Urbanization, Industrialization and Immigrants in Detroit, 1880-1920 (Chicago, 1982).Google Scholar

8 Williams, Karel, Halsam, Colin, and Williams, John, with Andy Adcroft and S. Joyal, “The Myth of the Line: Ford's Production of the Model T at Highland Park, 1909-1916,” Business History 35 (1993): 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also see Williams, Karel, Williams, John, Cutler, Tony, and Halsam, Colin, “The End of Mass Production?” Economy and Society 16 (1987): 405–39Google Scholar; Williams, Karel, Halsam, Colin, and Williams, John, “Ford versus ‘Fordism’: The Beginning of Mass Production,” Work, Employment and Society 6 (1992): 517–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Hirst, Paul and Zeitlin, Jonathan, “Flexible Specialization versus Post-Fordism: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications,” Economy and Society 20 (1991): 1–56Google Scholar; Scranton, Endless Novelty; Walker, Richard, “The Geographical Organization of Production-Systems,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 6 (1988), 377–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zeitlin, Jonathan, “Flexibility and Mass Production at War: Aircraft Manufacture in Britain, the United States and Germany, 1929-1945,” Technology and Culture 26 (1995): 46–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Stephen Amberg, “The Triumph of Industrial Orthodoxy: The Collapse of Studebaker-Packard,” in Lichtenstein and Meyer, On the Line, 190-218; Stephen Meyer, “The Persistence of Fordism: Workers and Technology in the American Automobile Industry, 1900-1960,” in Lichtenstein and Meyer, On the Line, 73-99.

11 Schwartz, Michael and Fish, Andrew, “Just-in-Time Inventories in Old Detroit,” Business History 40 (1998): 48–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Williams et al., “Ford Versus ‘Fordism’.”

12 Dicken, Peter and Malmberg, Anders, “Firms in Territories: A Relational Approach,” Economic Geography 77 (2001): 345–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Maskell, Peter and Malmberg, Anders, “The Competitiveness of Firms and Regions: ‘Ubiquitification’ and the Importance of Localized Learning,” European Urban and Regional Studies 6 (1999): 9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gertler, Meric, Wolfe, David, and Garkut, David, “No Place Like Home? The Embeddedness of Innovation in a Regional Economy,” Review of International Political Economy 7 (2000): 688–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Markusen, Anne, “Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts,” Economic Geography 72 (1996): 293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Staber, Udo, “The Structure of Networks in Industrial Districts,” InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 25 (2001): 537–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Leslie, Deborah and Reimer, Suzanne, “Spatializing Commodity Chains,” Progress in Human Geography 23 (1999): 401–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 The extent of Chicago's automotive industry is difficult to assess because the definitions that the manufacturing census used changed from year to year. The totals include automobile bodies and parts, automobiles, vehicle hardware, motorcycles, transmissions, engines, automotive stampings, and electrical equipment. In all years, the numbers underestimate the number of firms making products for the automotive industry. See the various manufacturing reports of the census and the Department of Commerce, Biennial Census of Manufactures, 1925 (Washington, D.C., 1928)Google Scholar.

15 Chicago Association of Commerce, Ways and Means Committee, “Growth of Automo-bile Industry and Chicago's Place in its Phenomenal Development,” Chicago Commerce (13 Feb. 1914): 28-30; Rubenstein, The Changing U.S. Auto Industry, 25-51.

16 Quote from “Chicago Has Big Automotive Industry,” Chicago Commerce (24 Jan. 1925): 11. Also see “Latest Industrial Development,” Chicago Commerce (26 Mar. 1927): 29; “Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (17 Mar. 1928): 24; and Chicago Commerce (3 Nov. 1928): 24.

17 Rae, John, American Automobile Manufacturers: The First Forty Years (Philadelphia, 1959), 6–44Google Scholar; Rubenstein, The Changing U.S. Auto Industry, 28-36; Chicago Association of Commerce, “Growth of Automobile Industry,” 30; Cronon, William, Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West (New York, 1991)Google Scholar.

18 Hendrickson, F. K., “Automobile's Influence on Machine Tool Industry,” Automotive Industries 45 (10 Nov. 1921): 926Google Scholar; Duggan, Edward, “Machines, Markets and Labor: The Carriage and Wagon Industry in Late-Nineteenth-Century Cincinnati,” Business History Review 51 (1977): 308–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hounshell, From the American System, 189-215.

19 Currey, Josiah, Manufacturing and Wholesale Industries of Chicago, vol. 3 (Chicago, 1918), 7–10.Google Scholar

20 Currey, Manufacturing and Wholesaling Industries, vol. 3, 282-5.

21 Directory of Illinois Manufacturers, 1924-1925 (Springfield, Ill., 1924), 238.Google Scholar

22 Currey, Manufacturing and Wholesaling Industries, vol. 3, 30-2, 86-8.

23 “24 Dealers Exhibit at Automobile Club,” Automotive Industries (7 Apr. 1921): 783; “Chicago World Center in Taxicab Industry,” Chicago Commerce (8 Sept. 1923): 15-16, 41.

24 “The Automotive Business in Chicago,” Chicago Commerce (2 June 1928): 11.

25 “Chicago Has Big Automotive Industry”; “Chicago Active in the Motor Truck Field,” Chicago Commerce (25 July 1925): 13-14; “The Automotive Business in Chicago.”

26 Currey, Manufacturing and Wholesaling Industries, vol. 3, 330.

27 “Chicago Has Big Automotive Industry.”

28 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977)Google Scholar; Nevins and Hill, Ford; Rae, American Automobile Manufacturers; Rubenstein, The Changing U.S. Auto Industry.

29 Rubenstein, The Changing U.S. Auto Industry, 101-8; Nevins and Hill, Ford, 283-93.

30 “Show Chicago's Place in Automotive Accessories: A Leader in Manufacture, a Leader in Distribution,” Chicago Commerce (2 June 1928): 9-10.

31 Schwartz and Fish, “Just-in-Time Inventories"; Williams et al., “Ford Versus ‘Fordism’.”

32 Schwartz and Fish, “Just-in-Time Inventories.”

33 Ibid.

34 “Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (8 Sept. 1928): 28.

35 “Chicago Has Big Automotive Industry,” 11.

36 Hogan, William, Economic History of the Iron and Steel Industry in the United States, vol. 3 (Lexington, Mass., 1971), 1000Google Scholar; “On the Highway of the Industry,” Automotive Industries (23 Feb. 1929): 260.

37 Polk's Chicago City Directory, 1928-1929 (Chicago, 1928).Google Scholar

38 “The Corey Steel Co.,” Chicago Commerce (12 Oct. 1929): 25.

39 “News of Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (19 Jan. 1924): 66; “Chicago World Center in Taxicab Industry”; “Cab Company to Make New Ambassador Car,” Automotive Industries 44 (20 Jan. 1921): 139Google Scholar; “24 Dealers Exhibit at Automotive Club”; “Show Chicago's Place in Automotive Accessories”; Directory of Illinois Manufacturers, 1924-1925; Directory of Illinois Manufacturers, 1928-1929 (Springfield, Ill., 1928)Google Scholar; “Latest News of Chicago Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (12 May 1923): 48.

40 “Variety No Bar to Mass Production,” Iron Age 124 (19 Sept. 1929): 723-9.

41 Norman Shidle, “Vehicle Builders Buying More Parts From Outside Sources,” Automotive Industries (27 Oct. 1928): 578.

42 “Stewart-Warner One of Most Successful Parts and Accessories Companies,” Automotive Industries (21 Jan. 1928): 80-2; “Show Chicago's Place in Automotive Accessories”; “Automotive Supply Manufacturers Extending Warehouses System,” Automotive Industries (18 Aug. 1928): 217-19, 237.

43 District Court of the United States. Bankruptcy Case Files; Bankruptcy Case 28646, “In the Matter of Chicago Standard Axle Company”; Schedule A (3), filed December 10, 1920; Walker, Prudence, ed., Directory of Illinois Manufacturers, 1920 (Chicago, 1920)Google Scholar.

44 “Latest News of Chicago Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (7 Apr. 1923): 40.

45 “C. G. Spring Acquires United States Bumper,” Automotive Industries (13 Jan. 1921): 97; “Latest News of Chicago Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (7 July 1923): 34.

46 Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (2 Feb. 1929): 20; “Pines Winter-front Erecting New Plant,” Automotive Industries (2 Feb. 1929): 183; “Pines Winterfront Company,” Commerce (July 1937): 41-5.

47 “Pullman Steel Body to Appear at Sales,” Automotive Industries (24 Jan. 1924): 203; “Buda Manufacturing New Engine for Bus,” Automotive Industries (7 Feb. 1924): 309; “New Yellow Cab Weighs 500 Pounds Less Than Previous Model,” Automotive Industries (10 Apr. 1924): 818.

48 “Latest News of Chicago Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (16 May 1925): 18. For the other marts, see Fulton, Deborah Rau, “The Making of the Merchandise Mart, 1927-1931: Air Rights and the Plan of Chicago,” in Zukowsky, John, ed., Chicago Architecture and Design, 1923-1993 (Munich, 1993), 99–117Google Scholar; Darling, Sharon, Chicago Furniture, Art, Craft and Industry, 1833-1933 (New York, 1984), 292–5Google Scholar.

49 “Business Done at Auto Show is Called Excellent Augury for the Future,” Chicago Commerce (4 Feb. 1922): 9.

50 “Chicago Has Big Automotive Industry.”

51 “Battery Makers to Form Organization in March,” Automotive Industries (31 Jan. 1924): 257; “Manufacturers Form Battery Association,” Automotive Industries (27 Mar. 1924): 740.

52 The location quotient (LQ) measures the degree to which an activity is concentrated in a specific area compared to all activities. An LQ of 1 means that the activity is geographically distributed to the same extent as all other activities. A number greater than 1 means that the activity is concentrated in the area, while less than 1 means that it is not.

53 District Court, Bankruptcy Case 28646.

54 District Court, Bankruptcy Case 28534, “In the Matter of B & W Manufacturing Company,” affidavit of mailing filed 20 Dec. 1920; District Court, Bankruptcy Case 28657, “In the Matter of Sunderland Manufacturing Company,” Schedule A (3), 1920.

55 District Court, Bankruptcy Case 39641, “In the Matter of Mohawk Auto Equipment Company,” affidavit of mailing filed 3 Dec. 1928; District Court, Bankruptcy Case 40632, “In the Matter of Unexcelled Auto Products Company,” affidavit of mailing filed 13 Oct. 1928.

56 Nevins and Hill, Ford, 255-7; Rubenstein, The Changing U.S. Auto Industry, 55-69; “Latest News of Chicago Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (6 Sept. 1924): 24.

57 John Drury “Hegewisch: The Dream of Early Industrialist,” newspaper clipping, Chicago Daily News, 1 July 1959, Chicago Public Library, Special Collections, Calumet Region Community Collection, Box 4, File 27; William Rowan, “South Chicago's History for First Hundred Years,” Daily Calumet, 6 June 1936, Chicago Public Library, Special Collections, South Chicago Community Collection, Box 4, File 5.

58 Drury, “Hegewisch.”

59 Drury, “Hegewisch”; Mayer, Harold and Wade, Richard, Chicago: Growth of a Metropolis (Chicago, 1969), 137.Google Scholar

60 An examination of the lists of new buildings, new starts, and moves taken from Iron Age and Chicago Commerce in the 1920s demonstrates that most automotive-firm activity took place within the automotive districts.

61 “Chicago Has Big Automotive Industry,” 30.

62 “Stewart-Warner”; “Auto Accessories Show Increase Here,” Chicago Commerce (18 Feb. 1928): 29; “Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (8 Dec. 1928): 18.

63 Nevins and Hill, Ford; Schwartz and Fish, “Just-in-Time Inventories.”

64 Directory of Illinois Manufacturers, 1924-1925; “News of Industrial Development Plans, Chicago Commerce (11 Mar. 1924): 28.

65 “Latest News of Chicago's Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (6 Sept. 1924), 24; “Latest Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (5 Dec. 1925): 22; “Industrial Development Plans,” Chicago Commerce (10 Dec. 1927): 26; “Plans for Industrial Development,” Chicago Commerce (18 May 1929): 22; Hogan, Economic History of the Iron and Steel Industry, 1006.