Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:47:28.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crisis and Adaptation in East Asian Innovation Systems: The Case of the Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and South Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William W. Keller*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Louis W. Pauly*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 292 Main Street-E38-652, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Tel.: 617-253-9861; Fax: 617-253-9330; E-mail: bkeller@mit.edu
Center for International Studies, University of Toronto, 1 Devonshire Place, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3K7, Canada. Tel.: 416-946-8930; Fax: 416-946-8915; E-mail: lpauly@chass.utoronto.ca

Abstract

In recent decades, both South Korea and Taiwan have made remarkable leaps in the development and production of semiconductors-the core element in burgeoning global telecommunications, computer, and computer equipment industries. Although many aspects of their sectoral industrial strategies have differed, both countries are now moving aggressively to adapt their semiconductor industries to turbulent global markets. In the wake of the severe regional financial crisis that began in 1997, this case study compares and contrasts continuing processes of adaptation among primary semiconductor manufacturers in the two countries. The crisis had observable effects, especially in Korea, but it was not deep enough to force fundamental adjustments in either country. In the early days of the industry in both places, a sense of vulnerability-the need to come from behind-gave rise to quite different corporate structures and attendant strategies. Remarkable differences persist in the ways in which the South Korean and Taiwanese semiconductor firms are seeking new advantages in rapidly changing regional and global markets. Strategic change and structural continuity mark the attempt of two relatively small countries to stay competitive in a key industry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2000 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ernst, Dieter. 1994. What are the Limits of the Korean Model? The Korean Electronics Industry Under Pressure. Research Paper, June. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy.Google Scholar
Keller, William. 1996. Global Access to Applied Research: Implications for the Semiconductor Industry. Monterey, CA: Monterey Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Kim, Linsu. 1997. The Dynamics of Technological Learning in Semiconductors. California Management Review 39(3).Google Scholar
Kraemer, Kenneth L. et al. 1996. Entrepreneurship, Flexibility, and Policy Coordination: Taiwan's Computer Industry. The Information Society 12(2).Google Scholar
Leipziger, D. M. 1988. Industrial Restructuring in Korea. World Development 16(1).Google Scholar
Liu, C. N. Undated. Software Development in Asian Pacific Region: The Case of the Nankang Software Park Project. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Moon, Chung-In. 2000. In the Shadow of Broken Cheers: The Dynamics of Globalization in South Korea. In Responding to Globalization edited by Prakash, Aseem and Hart, Jeffrey A. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation, Sciences Resources Studies Division, 2000. Survey of Earned Doctorates.Google Scholar
Noble, Gregory W. 2000. Conspicuous Failure and Hidden Strengths of the ITRI Model: Taiwan's Technology Policy Toward Hard Disk Drives and CD-ROMs. Report 2000–02. San Diego, CA: Information Storage Industry Center, Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis 1996. Capital Costs, Investment Time Horizons, and Financial Structures: The Context for Competition in the Semiconductor Industry in South Korea and Taiwan. Working Paper, 25 October. Monterey, CA: Monterey Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Stone, Mark R. 1998. Corporate Debt Restructuring in East Asia. Paper in Policy Analysis and Assessment, PPAA/98/13, October. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Bank, World. 1999. Report on Korea, 20 September.Google Scholar