Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:31:33.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On additivity of centralisers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Daniel Eremita
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, PeF, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia e-mail: daniel.eremita@uni-mb.si
Dijana Ilišević
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Zagreb, Bijenička 30, P.O.Box 335, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia e-mail: ilisevic@math.hr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R be a ring and let M be a bimodule over R. We consider the question of when a map φ: RM such that φ(ab) = φ(a)b for all a, bR is additive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2006

References

[1]Beidar, K.I., Martindale, W.S. 3rd and Mikhalev, A.V., Rings with generalized identities (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1996).Google Scholar
[2]Daif, M.N., ‘When is a multiplicative derivation additive?’, Internat. J. Math. Sci. 14 (1991), 615618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Jacobson, N., Structure of rings, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications 37 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1964).Google Scholar
[4]Johnson, B.E., ‘An introduction to the theory of centralizers’, Proc. London Math. Soc. 14 (1964), 299320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Johnson, R.E., ‘Rings with unique addition’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1958), 5761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Martindale, W.S. 3rd, ‘When are multiplicative mappings additive?’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (1969), 695698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Rickart, C.E., ‘One-to-one mappings of rings and lattices’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 54 (1948), 758764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Saworotnow, P.P. and Giellis, G.R., ‘Continuity and linearity of centralizers on a complemented algebra’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (1972), 142146.Google Scholar