Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:31:16.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Interacts with Whom? Drivers of Networked Welfare Governance in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2020

Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen ,
Reini Schrama Open the ORCID record for Reini Schrama [Opens in a new window]  and
Ellen Mastenbroek
Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen
Affiliation:
Copenhagen University, Denmark
Reini Schrama*
Affiliation:
Copenhagen University, Denmark
Ellen Mastenbroek
Affiliation:
Radboud University, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: reini.schrama@ifs.ku.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Migration is often perceived as a challenge to the welfare state. To manage this challenge, advanced welfare states have established transgovernmental networks. This article examines how domestic factors condition the interaction of representatives of advanced welfare states when they cooperate on transnational welfare governance. Based on new survey data, it compares who interacts with whom in one of the oldest transgovernmental networks of the European Union (EU) – the network that deals with EU citizens' rights to cross-border welfare. First, the authors perform a welfare cluster analysis of EU-28 and test whether institutional similarity explains these interactions. Furthermore, they test whether the level and kind of migration explains interaction and examine the explanatory value of administrative capacity. To test what drives interactions, the study employs social network analysis and exponential random graph models. It finds that cooperation in networked welfare governance tends to be homophilous, and that political cleavages between sending and receiving member states are mirrored in network interactions. Domestic factors are key drivers when advanced welfare states interact.

Keywords

transgovernmental networkswelfare statesmigrationcluster analysissocial network analysisEuropean Union
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 1636 - 1653
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, D and Newman, AL (2014) Domestic drivers of transgovernmental regulatory cooperation. Regulation & Governance 8(4), 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambra, C (2005) Cash versus services: ‘worlds of welfare’ and the decommodification of cash benefits and health care services. Journal of Social Policy 34(2), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambra, C (2007) Going beyond the three worlds of welfare capitalism: regime theory and public health research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 61(12), 1098–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyers, J and Donas, T (2014) Inter-regional networks in Brussels: analyzing the information exchanges among regional offices. European Union Politics 15(4), 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J and Kerremans, B (2004) Bureaucrats, politicians, and societal interests: how Is European policy making politicized? Comparative Political Studies 37(10), 1119–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blauberger, M et al. (2018) ECJ judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy 25(10), 1422–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G (1997) Classifying welfare states: a two-dimension approach. Journal of Social Policy 26(3), 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, C and Peters, Y (2018) Diversity and welfare state legitimacy in Europe. The challenge of intra-EU migration. Journal of European Public Policy 25(9), 1336–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, SJ and Desmarais, BA (2011) Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Analysis 19(1), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, RM and Walter, S (2015) Globalization, labor market risks, and class cleavages. In Beramendi, P, Häusermann, S, Kitschelt, H, Kriesi, H (eds), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, OA and Yesilkagit, K (2014) The effects of European regulatory networks on the bureaucratic autonomy of national regulatory authorities. Public Organization Review 14(3), 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, B and Newman, AL (2008) Escaping the international governance dilemma? Incorporated transgovernmental networks in the European Union. Governance, 21(1), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efrat, A. and Newman, AL (2018) Divulging data: domestic determinants of international information sharing. The Review of International Organizations 13(3), 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G (1990) The three political economies of the welfare state. International Journal of Sociology 20(3), 92–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2016) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and regulation (EC) No 987/2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004. COM (2016) 815 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2016:0815:FINGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2016) Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment: Initiative to Partially Revise Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Coordination Of Social Security Systems and its Omplementing Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the Coordination of Social Security Systems and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 Laying Down the Procedure for Implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004. SWD (2016) 460 final. Available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=SWD:2016:460:FINGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2018) Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment: Accompanying the Document to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Labour Authority. SWD (2018) 68 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0068:FINGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M (1996) The ‘Southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 6(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M (2003) European integration and national social citizenship: changing boundaries, new structuring. Comparative Political Studies 36 611–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M (2005) The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the new Spatial Politics of Social Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M and Pellegata, A (2018) Worker mobility under attack? Explaining labour market chauvinism in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 25(10), 1461–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, A and Hadj-Abdou, L (2016) An unstable equilibrium: freedom of movement and the welfare state in the European Union. In Freeman, G and Mirilovic, N (eds), Handbook on Migration and Social Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers, pp. 222–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodreau, SM, Kitts, JA and Morris, M (2009) Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography 46(1), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handcock, MS, et al. (2008) Statnet: software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. Journal of Statistical Software 24(1), 1548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartlapp, M and Heidbreder, EG (2018) Mending the hole in multilevel implementation: administrative cooperation related to worker mobility. Governance 31(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, A (2013) Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hjorth, F (2015) Who benefits? Welfare chauvinism and national stereotypes. European Union Politics, 17(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, SB (2016) The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy 23(9), 1259–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isett, KR, et al. (2011) Networks in public administration scholarship: understanding where we are and where we need to go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(1), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C, Hesterly, WS and Borgatti, SP (1997) A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 22(4), 911–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, O (1994) The politics of social security: on regressions, qualitative comparisons, and cluster analysis. In Janoski, T and Hicks, AM (eds), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautto, M (2002) Investing in services in West European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 12(1), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, RD and Tarrant, AD (2011) The political foundations of the Eurocracy. West European Politics 34(5), 922–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenis, P and Schneider, V (1991) Policy networks and policy analysis: scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In Marin, B and Mayntz, R (eds), Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Frankfurt am Mainz: Campus Verlag, pp. 25–59.Google Scholar
Keohane, RO and Nye, JS (1974) Transgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Politics 27(01), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W and Palme, J (1998) The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American Sociological Review 63(5), 661–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazega, E, Quintane, E and Casenaz, S (2017) Collegial oligarchy and networks of normative alignments in transnational institution building. Social Networks 48, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibfried, S (2015) Social policy: left to the judges and the markets? In Wallace, WWHS, Pollack, MA, Wallace, H and Young, AR (eds), Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–283.Google Scholar
Leifeld, P and Schneider, V (2012) Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science 56(3), 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, W (2013) Free movement and discrimination: evidence from Europe, the United States, and Canada. European Journal of Migration and Law 15(1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, DS, Schrama, R and Mastenbroek, E (2020) Replication Data for: Who interacts with whom? Drivers of networked welfare governance in Europe, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/811M8C, Harvard Dataverse, V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M, Smith-Lovin, L and Cook, JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27(1), 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murtagh, F and Legendre, P (2014) Ward's hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward's criterion? Journal of Classification 31(3), 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y (2018) How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting. Regulation & Governance 12(4), 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, K and Kenis, P (2007) Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, K (2002) The architecture of international cooperation: transgovernmental networks and the future of international law. Virginia Journal of International Law 43(1), 1–92.Google Scholar
Robins, G, et al. (2012) Simplified account of an exponential random graph model as a statistical model. In Lusher, D, Koskinen, J and Robins, G (eds), Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos, C (2018) EU Freedoms at a critical juncture? Culture 3(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
Roos, C and Westerveen, L (2019) The conditionality of EU freedom of movement: normative change in the discourse of EU institutions. Journal of European Social Policy 30(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruffing, E (2015) Agencies between two worlds: information asymmetry in multilevel policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy 22(8), 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhs, M and Palme, J (2018) Institutional contexts of political conflicts around free movement in the European Union: a theoretical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy 25(10), 1481–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson Thierry, J (2019) Regaining Control. Welfare State Strategies against Unwanted EU Law. PhD. Thesis. Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Scharpf, FW (1997) Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schrama, R (2018) Swift, brokered and broad-based information exchange: how network structure facilitates stakeholders monitoring EU policy implementation. Journal of Public Policy 39(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
Slaughter, AM (2004) Disaggregated sovereignty: towards the public accountability of global government networks. Government and Opposition 39(2), 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, AM and Hale, T (2010) Transgovernmental networks. In Bevir, M (ed.), The Handbook of Governance. London: SAGE, pp. 342–351.Google Scholar
Snijders, TA et al. (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology 36(1), 99–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teney, C, Lacewell, OP and De Wilde, P (2014) Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: attitudes and ideologies. European Political Science Review 6(4), 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turrini, A, et al. (2010) Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration 88(2), 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Boetzelaer, K and Princen, S (2012) The quest for co-ordination in European regulatory networks. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(5), 819–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vantaggiato, FP (2018) The drivers of regulatory networking: policy learning between homophily and convergence. Journal of Public Policy 39(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
Walter, S (2017) Globalization and the demand-side of politics: How globalization shapes labor market risk perceptions and policy preferences. Political Science Research and Methods 5(1), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, C (2009) Mapping European healthcare systems: a comparative analysis of financing, service provision and access to healthcare. Journal of European Social Policy 19(5), 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2017) Worldwide Governance Indicators Database (WGI). Available from www.govindicators.org.Google Scholar
Zhelyazkova, A, Kaya, C and Schrama, R (2016) Decoupling practical and legal compliance: analysis of member states’ implementation of EU policy. European Journal of Political Research 55(4), 827–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Martinsen et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/811M8C
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Martinsen et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Martinsen et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 676.2 KB