Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:03:04.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turnout and Marginality in Local Elections: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

D. T. Denver  and
Gordon Hand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his brief note on turnout and marginality in a recent issue of this journal Newton [K. Newton, ‘Turnout and Marginality in Local Elections’, II (1972), 251–5], raises some interesting questions. In our view, however, the boldness of some of his conclusions is not warranted by the evidence he presents or by his supporting argument. In particular, we think three points deserve comment.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 513 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See for example, Bochel, J. M. and Denver, D. T., ‘Canvassing, Turnout and Party Support: an Experiment’, British Journal of Political Science, I (1971), 257–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and the works cited in footnote II on page 258. See also Bochel, J. M. and Denver, D. T., ‘The Impact of the Campaign on the Results of Local Government Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, II (1972), 239–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 See for example, Butler, David and Stokes, Donald, Political Change in Britain (London: Macmillan, 1969), Chap. 12.Google Scholar