Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T00:30:41.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Context and Inter-Group Political Attitudes: Experiments in Group Conflict Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2003

JAMES M. GLASER
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Tufts University

Abstract

Previous studies of group conflict theory look at the relationship between racial balance in a particular area (precinct, county, etc.) and racial attitudes or political behaviour within that area. While of value, there are significant methodological disadvantages to this approach. Here, I address those problems using public opinion experiments in which I ask respondents whether they would allocate political goods proportionally given different (randomly assigned) hypothetical racial environments. The experiment yields confirmatory results, with non-blacks more likely to support proportionality in less black than heavily black environments. In a second experiment, I find that the same relationship is much weaker when the variations in population are non-racial. Finally, I show that the relationship also holds for blacks and argue that this is theoretically consistent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)