Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:52:35.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Validation of Measures of Strategic Motivations: A Critical Comment on Alvarez and Nagler

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2001

GEOFFREY EVANS
GEOFFREY EVANS
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, Oxford.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In their recent article in this Journal, Alvarez and Nagler model strategic voting in the 1987 British general election using multinomial probit.R. Michael Alvarez and Jonathan Nagler, ‘A New Approach to Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections, British Journal of Political Science, 30 (2000), 57–75. They claim to find lower levels of such voting than many other approaches. They also demonstrate purportedly that estimates of strategic voting obtained using self-reported motivations are biased by the time elapsed between the election and the point at which the self-report is obtained. In this Comment I show that these assertions are incorrect.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 2002 , pp. 185 - 188
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)