Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-l9twb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T01:02:19.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Works? Competitive Strategies of Major Parties Out of Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2001

KENNETH FINEGOLD
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Eastern Washington University
ELAINE K. SWIFT
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Eastern Washington University

Abstract

What should major parties out of power do to win elections? To answer that question, we need to understand what these parties do to recapture political ascendancy and whether their actual behaviour differs from their optimal behaviour. In this article, we propose a systematic, replicable method of identifying the competitive strategies that American parties out of power have adopted in their pursuit of the presidency. We present a taxonomy of party strategies, which we operationalize by comparison of utility functions for hypothetical voters. Using both directional and proximity models of issue voting, we compute these utility functions for each presidential election from 1852 to 1996, controlling for variables that systematically affect voting, including economic conditions and incumbency. These results suggest that, contrary to the views of many political scientists and party activists, there is no single optimal strategy through which parties out of power can regain it. Rather, several competitive strategies offer similar prospects for electoral success.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)