Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Electoral Fraud or Violence: The Effect of Observers on Party Manipulation Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

Abstract

This article reports on the effects of domestic election observers on electoral fraud and violence. Using an experimental research design and polling station data on fraud and violence during Ghana’s 2012 elections, it shows that observers reduced fraud and violence at the polling stations which they monitored. It is argued that local electoral competition shapes party activists’ response to observers. As expected, in single-party dominant areas, parties used their local political networks to relocate fraud to polling stations without an election observer, and, in contrast, party activists relocated violence to stations without observers in competitive areas – a response that requires less local organizational capacity. This highlights how local party organization and electoral incentives can shape the manipulative electoral strategies employed by parties in democratic elections.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Asunka: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (email: jasunka@hewlett.org); Brierley, Golden and Ofosu: Department of Political Science, University of California Los Angeles (sabrierley@ucla.edu, golden@ucla.edu, ofosu@ucla.edu ); Kramon: Department of Political Science, George Washington University (ekramon@gwu.edu). The authors are grateful to Daniel de Kadt, Jennifer Doherty, Barbara Geddes, Danny Hidalgo, Theresa Kuhn, John McCauley, Galen Murray, Daniel Posner, Michael Ross, Michael Thies, Daniel Treisman, Lynn Vavreck, and Adam Ziegfeld for comments. They also wish to record their gratitude for useful comments from audience members at various workshops held at Stanford, the APSA in Chicago, UC at Berkeley, UCLA, Montreal and Gothenburg 2013–15. They gratefully acknowledge the collaboration of their research partner in Ghana, the Centre for Democratic Development, as well as Ghana’s Coalition of Domestic Election Observers. They also thank their 300 research assistants for data collection. Funding came from the United Kingdom’s Ghana office of the Department for International Development and a U.S. National Science Foundation Grant for Rapid Response Research (RAPID) SES–1265247 (Miriam Golden PI), as well as the UCLA Academic Senate, none of which bears responsibility for the results reported here. This research was approved by the University of California at Los Angeles IRB#12-001543, 2012. Data replication sets available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse.BJPolS and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S0007123416000491.

References

Amankwaah, Clementina. 2013. Election-Related Violence: The Case of Ghana. Current African Issues, Nordiska Afrikaininstitutet, Issue 56. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:689688/FULLTEXT01.pdf.Google Scholar
Baird, Sarah, Bohren, J. Aislinn, McIntosh, Craig, and Ozler, Berk. 2014. Designing Experiments to Measure Spillover Effects, Policy Research Working Paper No. 6824. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Beber, Bernd, and Scacco, Alexandra. 2012. What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud. Political analysis 20 (2):211234.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2007. Electoral Systems and Election Misconduct. Comparative Political Studies 40 (12):15331556.Google Scholar
Bob-Milliar, George M. 2012. Political Party Activism in Ghana: Factors Influencing the Decision of the Politically Active to Join a Political Party. Democratization 19 (4):668689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael. 2008. Vote Buying and Violence in Nigerian Election Campaigns. Electoral Studies 27 (4):621632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callen, Michael, and Long, James D.. 2015. Institutional Corruption and Election Fraud: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan. American Economic Review 105 (1):354381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Vicente, Pedro C.. 2012. Violence, Bribery, and Fraud: The Political Economy of Elections in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Choice 153 (1–2):117147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Vicente, Pedro C.. 2014. Votes and Violence: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria. Economic Journal 124 (issue 574):327355.Google Scholar
Deckert, Joseph, Myagkov, Mikhail, and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 2011. Benford’s Law and the Detection of Election Fraud. Political Analysis 19 (3):245268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enikolopov, Ruben, Korovkin, Vasily, Petrova, Maria, Sonin, Konstantin, and Zakharov, Alexei. 2013. Field Experiment Estimate of Electoral Fraud in Russian Parliamentary Elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (2):448452.Google ScholarPubMed
European Union. 2009. Ghana Final Report: Presidential and Parliamentary Elections 2008. Technical Report, European Union Election Observation Mission. Brussels.Google Scholar
Fridy, Kevin. 2007. The Elephant, Umbrella, and Quarrelling Cocks: Disaggregating Partisanship in Ghana’s Fourth Republic. African Affairs 106 (423):281305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gyimah-Boadi, E., and Brobbey, V.. 2012. Countries at the Crossroads: Ghana. Washington, D.C.: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hyde, Susan D., and Jablonski, Ryan S.. 2014. When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence? British Journal of Political Science 44 (1):149179.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2007. How Do Rules and Institutions Encourage Vote Buying? Pp. 4760 in Frederic Charles Schaffer, ed. Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2007. The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics 60 (1):3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2010. Experimenting in Democracy: International Observers and the 2004 Pesidential Elections in Indonesia. Perspectives on Politics 8 (2):511527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2011. The Pseudo-Democrat’s Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ichino, Naomi, and Schündeln, Matthias. 2012. Deterring or Displacing Electoral Irregularities? Spillover Effects of Observers in a Randomized Field Experiment in Ghana. Journal of Politics 74 (1):292307.Google Scholar
Jockers, Heinz, Kohnert, Dirk, and Nugent, Paul. 2010. The Successful Ghana Election of 2008: A Convenient Myth? Journal of Modern African Studies 48 (1):95115.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2011. Data on International Election Monitoring: Three Global Datasets on Election Quality, Election Events and International Election Observation. ICPSR1461-v1. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2012. Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works, and Why it Often Fails. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2003. Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science 6:233256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice Edouard. 2002. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I., and Morrison, Minion K. C.. 2008. Are African Voters Really Ethnic or Clientelistic? Survey Evidence from Ghana. Political Science Quarterly 123 (1):95122.Google Scholar
Molina, Iván, and Lehoucq, Fabrice Edouard. 1999. Political Competition and Electoral Fraud: A Latin American Case Study. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 30 (2):199234.Google Scholar
Moore, David S., and McCabe, George P.. 2004. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 5th edn, New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Osei, Anja. 2012. Party-Voter Linkage in Africa: Ghana and Senegal in Comparative Perspective. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A., and Torvik, Ragnar. 2009. The Real Swing Voter’s Curse. American Economic Review 99 (2):310315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salih, Mohamed, and Nordlund, Per. 2007. Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty Democracy. Regional Report 2007 IDEA. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13 (2):3650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Fredrik M. 2012. Making Voters Count: Evidence from Field Experiments about the Efficacy of Domestic Election Observation. Working Paper No. 1. Columbia University, New York: Harriman Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel A. 2002. Consolidating Democracy? The Structural Underpinnings of Ghana’s 2000 Elections. Journal of Modern African Studies 40 (4):621650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Mark. 1987. Public Appearance/Private Realities. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, Scott, and Taylor, Charlie. 2012. Democratization and Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2008. Pp. 1538 in Dorina A. Bekoe, ed. Voting in Fear. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A. 2007. Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Postcommunist Colored Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5 (3):535551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weghorst, Keith R., and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2013. What Drives the Swing Voter in Africa? American Journal of Political Science 57 (3):717743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidmann, Nils B., and Callen, Michael. 2013. Violence and Election Fraud: Evidence from Afghanistan. British Journal of Political Science 43 (1):5375.Google Scholar
Whitfield, Lindsay. 2009. ‘Change for a Better Ghana’: Party Competition, Institutionalization and Alternation in Ghana’s 2008 Elections. African Affairs 108 (433):621641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Steven I. 2004. Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2009. Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth-Century Germany. American Political Science Review 103 (1):121.Google Scholar

Asunka et al. Dataset

Link

Asunka supplementary material

Asunka supplementary material 1

PDF 430 KB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 135
Total number of PDF views: 951 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 07th February 2017 - 19th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-xbf5p Total loading time: 0.373 Render date: 2021-01-19T05:39:46.601Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Tue Jan 19 2021 04:55:24 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Electoral Fraud or Violence: The Effect of Observers on Party Manipulation Strategies
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Electoral Fraud or Violence: The Effect of Observers on Party Manipulation Strategies
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Electoral Fraud or Violence: The Effect of Observers on Party Manipulation Strategies
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *