Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T11:49:33.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in sheep on the absorption of magnesium from a low molecular weight fraction of the reticulo-rumen contents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

N. D. Grace ,
I. W. Caple  and
A. D. Care
N. D. Grace
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
I. W. Caple
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
A. D. Care
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Six sheep, three animals per diet, were prepared with rumen fistulas and fed on frozen grass or grass–maize pellets to give magnesium intakes of 1·79 and 2·23 g/d respectively. The mean apparent availabilities of Mg in sheep fed on frozen grass and grass–maize pellets were 0·31 and 0·36 respectively.

2. The rumen contents were fractionated by straining the digesta through linen cloth and then differentially centrifuged to give 20 000 g and 100 000 g supernatant fractions.

3. In all sheep, regardless of diet, at 4 and 16 h after a meal, 50 and 60% respectively of the total Mg in the rumen contents was found in strained rumen fluid while 30 and 38% respectively of the total Mg was found in the 100 000 g supernatant fraction.

4. The net absorption of Mg from the temporarily isolated and washed reticulo-rumen was studied using either 100 000 g supernatant fractions of rumen contents from sheep fed on one or other of the two diets, or inorganic buffers containing the same concentration of Mg and other macroelements.

5. The Mg was readily absorbed from the 100 000 g supernatant fraction placed in the rumen with the rate of absorption being 7·3 μmol/1 per min (505 mg/d) from the supernatant fraction obtained from sheep fed on frozen grass and 11.3 μmo/1 per min (781 mg/d) from the supernatant fraction from sheep fed on grass–maize pellets. In the same sheep, the previously described rates of Mg absorption from the 100 000 g supernatant fraction were similar to those obtained from the comparable inorganic buffers.

6. The effects of varying concentrations of potassium and sodium on the net absorption rate of Mg (as 24Mg) and on the one-way efflux of Mg (as 28Mg) from supernatant fractions or rumen fluid and inorganic buffers were investigated using the temporarily-isolated and washed rumen in three sheep. Although the net absorption rate of 24Mg from supernatant fractions or buffers containing similar K concentrations varied significantly between sheep, a similar percentage decrease in the absorption rates of both 24Mg and 28Mg was found for each sheep as the K concentration was increased.

7. One pair of sheep was fed on the frozen grass and the other pair was fed on the grass–maize pellets. Their daily intakes of K were then increased to 50 g/d for 14 d by intrarumen infusion of potassium chloride. In three of the four sheep the plasma Mg concentration fell within 12 h of the start of the KCl administration. In all sheep urinary excretion of Mg decreased and its faecal output increased. The increased intake of K had no effect on the distribution of Mg in the rumen contents.

8. Gel-filtration chromatography of the 100 000 g supernatant fractions, regardless of the diet, showed that over 90% of the Mg in the 100 000 g supernatant fractions was associated with a low-molecular-weight fraction of about 200 Da which corresponded to the elution volume of magnesium chloride in 0·1 M-sodium chloride.

9. It is concluded that any binding of Mg ions to small organic molecules in the 100 000 g supernatant fraction of rumen contents played no significant role in the restriction of Mg absorption from the reticula-rumen. The depressent effect of increased K concentration in rumen contents on the net absorption of Mg is via a reduction in the absorptive flux rather than by increased secretion of Mg into the rumen fluid.

Type
General Nutrition papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 93 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminunt Livestock. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Beardsworth, L. J., Beardsworth, P. M. & Care, A. D. (1987). Journal of Physiology 386, 89P.Google Scholar
Bray, G. A. (1960). Analytical Biochemistry 1, 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. C., Care, A. D. & Pickard, D. W. (1978). Journal of Physiology 276, 62P–63P.Google Scholar
Care, A. D., Brown, R. C., Farrar, A. R. & Pickard, D. W. (1984). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 69, 577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A., Sellers, A. F. & Gatewood, V. H. (1976). American Journal qf Physiology 231, 1595–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. C. (1983). In Role of Magnesium in Animal Nutrition, pp. 139–171 [Pontenot, J. P., Bunce, G. E., Webb, K. E. Jr and Allen, V. G., editors]. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Field, A. C. & Munro, C. S. (1977). Journal of Agricultura1 Science, Cambridge 89, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. C. & Suttle, N. F. (1979). Journal of Comparative Pathology 89, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, N. D. (1983). In Role of Magnesium in Animal Nutrition, pp. 107–120 [Fontenot, J. P., Bunce, G. E., Webb, K. E. Jr and Allen, V. G., (editors). Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Grace, N. D., Ulyatt, M. J. & MacRae, J. C. (1974). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, H. (1979). Berliner and Muenchener Tieraerztliche Wochenschrift 92, 152–155.Google Scholar
Martens, H. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 49, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, H., Gabel, G. & Strozyk, P. (1987). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology (In the press).Google Scholar
Martens, H., Harmeyer, J. & Michael, H. (1978). Research in Veterinary Science 24, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, H. & Rayssiguier, Y. (1980). In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp 447–466. [Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P., editors]. Lancaster: MTP Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molloy, L. F. & Richards, E. L. (1971). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. B. & van Soest, P. J. (1984). Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology 47, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. & Dobson, A. D. (1965). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 50, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjollema, B. (1931). Lundbouwkindig Tijdschrift 43, 793–815.Google Scholar
SPSS (1986). SPSS User's Guide, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Storry, J. E. (1961). Journal of Agricultural Science. Cambridge 57, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F. & Field, A. C. (1967). British Journal of Nutrition 21, 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F. & Field, A. C. (1969). British Journal of Nutrition 21, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomas, F. M. & Potter, B. J. (1976). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 27, 873–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar