Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T12:38:05.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sleep and activity, age and fatness, and the energy expenditure of confined sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

P-L. Toutain ,
Claire Toutain ,
A. J. F. Webster  and
J. D. McDonald
P-L. Toutain
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Claire Toutain
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. D. McDonald
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Changes in energy expenditure associated with sleep and activity, age and fatness were measured in sheep. States of vigilance were defined according to electrophysiological records as awake, drowsy, slow-wave sleep (SWS) and paradoxical sleep (PS; Ruckebusch, 1972). Energy expenditure was determined from respiratory exchange. Three groups, each of four sheep were used; yearlings, old (4-6 years of age) fat and old thin sheep. Body fat content was estimated from deuterium oxide space.

2. The amount of time spent by sheep from each group at each state of vigilance was similar, total ‘sleep’ time being 200-250 min/night.

3. The absolute decrease in energy expenditure during drowsiness and sleep was similar for all groups of sheep. The difference between SWS and lying awake was 20-27 J/kg body-weight (W)0.75 per min. Heat production was about the same for SWS and PS.

4. The energy cost of rumination was about 0.34 kJ/kg W per h.

5. The increase in heat production during standing consisted of the energy cost of standing, approximately 0.7 kJ/kg W per h, and the energy cost of changing position, approximately 47 J/kg W.

6. The old thin sheep had a slightly higher heat production on a per kg total W0.75 basis than the old fat sheep, but this difference largely disappeared when heat production was related to ‘lean’ W. On average energy expenditure was approximately 25% lower in the old sheep than in the yearling animals. This difference could not be related to difference in activity or in the energy costs of activity per unit of time.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , November 1977 , pp. 445 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1974). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 14, 115.Google Scholar
Brebbia, D. R. & Altshuler, K. Z. (1965). Science, N. Y. 150, 1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental designs, 2nd ed. p. 296. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Davey, A. W. F. & Holmes, C. W. (1977). Anim. Prod. 24, 355.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Passmore, R. (1967). Energy, Work and Leisure. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Foot, J. Z. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, J. S. (1974). Energy Balance and Obesity in Man. London: North Holland Publications.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. G. (1968). WId Rev. Nutr. Diet. 9, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, 231.Google Scholar
Hall, W. C. & Brody, S. (1933). Univ. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. no. 180.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P., Weston, R. H. & Lindsay, J. R. (1969). Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osuji, P. O. (1974). J. Range Mgt 27, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osuji, P. O., Gordon, J. G. & Webster, A. J. F. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quenouille, M. H., Boyne, A. W., Fisher, W. B. & Leitch, I. (1951). Tech. Commun. Bur. Anim. Nutr., Aberd., no. 17.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. (1972). Anim. Behav. 20, 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. (1975). Appl. Anim. Ethology 2, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toutain, P-L. & Ruckebusch, Y. (1973). C. r. Soc. Biol. 167, 550.Google Scholar
Toutain, P-L. & Webster, A. J. F. (1975). C. r. Acad. Sci., Paris, D, 1605.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. K., Benson, H. & Wilson, A. F. (1971). Am. J. Physiol. 221, 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P. & Hiestand, M. (1975). J. appl. Physiol. 38, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. & Hicks, A. M. (1968). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 48, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar