Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T23:58:56.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of a novel series of inhibitors of rumen methanogenesis; in vitro and in vivo experiments including growth trials on 2,4-bis (trichloromethyl)-benzo [1, 3]dioxin-6-carboxylic acid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. Davies
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, Pharmaceuticals Division, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG
H. N. Nwaonu
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, Pharmaceuticals Division, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG
G. Stanier
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, Pharmaceuticals Division, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG
F. T. Boyle
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, Pharmaceuticals Division, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A procedure for measuring methane production by rumen contents incubated anaerobically in vitro is described. Assessments of methane production in vivo, in both sheep and cattle, were made by withdrawal of rumen contents and measuring their capacity to produce methane in vitro.

2. Many members of a series of 6-substituted 2,4-bis (trichloromethyl)-benzo[1,3]dioxins were potent inhibitors of methanogenesis by rumen contents in vitro. The most potent compound inhibited methane production by 70% or more at a concentration of 1 μg/ml (approximately 2.5 μmol/l).

3. Two compounds, namely the 6-carboxylic acid (IC1 13409) and the 6-carboxamide (ICI 43586), caused a large inhibition of methanogenesis sustained for many hours, following a single intrarumen injection in sheep or cattle. Inhibition was maintained for long periods by single daily dosing directly into the rumen or by dietary administration.

4. In a 28-week growth trial in beef cattle inclusion of ICI 13409 in the concentrate element of the diet, at a level of 6 mg/kg body-weight, improved live-weight gam by 8·0% (P < 0·05) with respect to untreated animals whilst reducing food intake by 5·0% (P < 0·05). Smaller and not statistically-significant effects were seen with this compound at 3 mg/kg body-weight and with the antibiotic monensin(Romensin; ElancoPLC). All treatments significantly improved the retention of dietary energy into the carcass, offal and intestinal tracts of the trial animals and significantly reduced the quantity of methane eructed into expired gases.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

Bergman, C. (1964). J. Am. vet. Res. 25, 848.Google Scholar
Boyle, F. T. & Davies, A. (1977). U.K. Patent 1502116.Google Scholar
Clapperton, J. L. (1977). Anim. Prod. 24, 169.Google Scholar
Cole, N. A. & McCroskey, J. E. (1975). J. Anim. Sci. 41, 1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W. & Brekenridge, G. (1975 a). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W. & Brekenridge, G. (1975 b). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (1972). J. Anim. Sci. 35, 1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, B. C. & Wolfe, R. S. (1971). Nature, Lond. 234, 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufener, W. H. Jr & Wolin, M. J. (1968). Appl. Microbiol. 16, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, M. S., Hoover, W. H. & Sniffen, C. J. (1974). J. Anim. Sci. 38, 908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanier, G. & Davies, A. (1981). Br. J. Nutr. 45, 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trei, J. E., Parish, R. C., Singh, Y. K. & Scott, G. C. (1971). J. Dairy Sci. 54, 536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trei, J. E., Scott, G. C. & Parish, R. C. (1972). J. Anim. Sci. 34, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Nevel, C. J., Henderickx, H. K., Demeyer, D. I. & Martin, J. (1969). Appl. Microbiol. 17, 695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar