Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:07:20.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nutritive Value of Colostrum for the Calf

1. The Effect of Different Fractions of Colostrum*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. Aschaffenburg ,
S. Bartlett ,
S. K. Kon ,
P. Terry ,
S. Y. Thompson ,
D. M. Walker ,
C. Briggs ,
E. Cotchin  and
R. Lovell
R. Aschaffenburg
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
S. Bartlett
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
S. K. Kon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
P. Terry
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
S. Y. Thompson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
D. M. Walker
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
C. Briggs
Affiliation:
Research Institute in Animal Pathology, Royal Veterinary College, Camden Town, London, N.W. 1
E. Cotchin
Affiliation:
Research Institute in Animal Pathology, Royal Veterinary College, Camden Town, London, N.W. 1
R. Lovell
Affiliation:
Research Institute in Animal Pathology, Royal Veterinary College, Camden Town, London, N.W. 1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 3 , Issue 2-3 , September 1949 , pp. 187 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1949

References

Aschaffenburg, R., Bartlett, S., Kon, S. K., Terry, P., Thompson, S. Y., Walker, D. M., Briggs, C. & Cotchin, E. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, xxx.Google Scholar
Aschaffenburg, R., Bartlett, S., Kon, S. K., Walker, D. M., Briggs, C., Cotchin, E. & Lovell, R. (1949). Brit. J. Nutrit. 3, 196.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. D. & Phillips, P. H. (1944). Bull. Wis. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 465, p. 38.Google Scholar
Hansen, R. G., Phillips, P. H. & Rupel, I. W. (1946). J. Dairy Sci. 29, 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K., Lea, C. H. & White, J. C. D. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 292.Google Scholar
Hibbs, J. W. & Krauss, W. E. (1947). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 115.Google Scholar
Howe, P. E. (1925). Physiol. Rev. 5, 439.Google Scholar
Lundquist, N. S. & Phillips, P. H. (1942). J. Dairy Sci. 25, 685.Google Scholar
Lundquist, N. S. & Phillips, P. H. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 1023.Google Scholar
Nevens, W. B. & Kendall, K. A. (1947). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 175.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. H., Lundquist, N. S. & Boyer, P. D. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. L. (1948). J. Dairy Sci. 31, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. (1930). J. exp. Med. 51, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. & Little, R. B. (1922). J. exp. Med. 36, 181.Google Scholar
‘Student’ (1908). Biometrika, 6, 1.Google Scholar
‘Student’ (1925). Metron, 5, 105.Google Scholar