Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T22:58:11.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

L-carnitine supplementation of sows during pregnancy improves the suckling behaviour of their offspring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

Carmen Birkenfeld ,
Holger Kluge  and
Klaus Eder
Carmen Birkenfeld
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Emil-Abderhalden-Strasse 26, D-06108 Halle/Saale, Germany
Holger Kluge
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Emil-Abderhalden-Strasse 26, D-06108 Halle/Saale, Germany
Klaus Eder*
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Emil-Abderhalden-Strasse 26, D-06108 Halle/Saale, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Professor Klaus Eder, fax +49 345 552 7124, email: klaus.eder@landw.uni-halle.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It has been shown that l-carnitine supplementation of sows increases their milk production and the postnatal growth of the suckling piglets. To test the hypothesis that this effect is due to an improved suckling behaviour of the piglets, two experiments with sows were performed. Two groups of thirteen or ten sows each (in experiments 1 and 2, respectively) were fed diets with or without supplemental l-carnitine during pregnancy (125mg/d) and lactation (250mg/d). After birth, the litters of all sows were standardised to equal sizes of eleven and nine piglets per litter in experiments 1 and 2, respectively. In experiment 1, the piglets of l-carnitine-supplemented sows had a higher total suckling time per day on days 3, 6 and 9, and greater weight gains during the suckling period, than the piglets of control sows (P<0·05). In experiment 2, all litters were taken away from their mothers and switched to other sows. Half of the control sows and half of the l-carnitine-supplemented sows were given litters born to control sows, the other half of each group being given litters born to l-carnitine-supplemented sows. Piglets born to l-carnitine-supplemented sows had a higher total suckling time per day on day 3 and greater body weight gains during the first 14d compared with piglets born to control sows (P<0·05). This study shows that piglets born to sows supplemented with l-carnitine are able to suckle for longer, which enables them to obtain more milk and grow faster than piglets born to control sows.

Keywords

L-CarnitineSowPigletSuckling behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 96 , Issue 2 , August 2006 , pp. 334 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2006

References

Auldist, DE, Carlson, D, Morrish, L, Wakeford, CM & King, RHThe influence of suckling interval on milk production of sows. J Anim Sci (2000) 78, 2026–2031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auldist, DE, Morrish, L, Eason, PThe influence of litter size on milk production of sows. Anim Sci (1998) 67, 333–337.Google Scholar
Baltzell, JK, Bazer, FW, Miguel, SG & Borum, PRThe neonatal piglet as a model for human neonatal carnitine metabolism.. J Nutr (1987) 117, 754–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, R & Buchholz, HMethodenbuch Band III. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln 3 Ergänzungslieferung Darmstadt:. VDLUFA-Verlag. (1993)Google Scholar
Birkenfeld, C, Doberenz, J, Kluge, H & Eder, KEffect of L-carnitine supplementation of sows on L-carnitine status, body composition and concentrations of lipids in liver and plasma of their piglets at birth and during the suckling period. Anim Feed Sci Technol (Epublication ahead of print version) (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borum, PRPossible carnitine requirement of the newborn and the effect of genetic disease on the carnitine requirement. Nutr Rev (1981) 39, 385–390.Google Scholar
Coffey, TM, Shireman, RB, Herman, DL & Jons, EECarnitine status and lipid utilization in neonatal piglets fed diets low in carnitine. J Nutr (1991) 121, 1047–1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eder, K, Ramanau, A & Kluge, HEffect of L-carnitine supplementation on performance parameters in gilts and sows. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (2001) 85, 73–80.Google Scholar
Forsyth, IAVariation among species in the endocrine control of mammary growth and function: the roles of prolactin, growth hormone, and placental lactogen. J Dairy Sci (1986) 69, 886–903.Google Scholar
Forsyth, IA & Wallis, MGrowth hormone and prolactin-molecular and functional evolution. J Mamm Gland Biol Neopl (2002) 7, 291–312.Google Scholar
Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie (Ausschuβ für Bedarfsnormen) (1987) Energie- und Nährstoffbedarf landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere, Nr. 4 Schweine, pp 30–43, Frankfurt/Main: DLG-Verlag.Google Scholar
Grube, M, Schwabedissen, HM, Draber, K, Prager, D, Moritz, KU, Linnemann, K, Fusch, C, Jedlitschky, G & Kroemer, HKExpression, localization, and function of the carnitine transporter octn2 (slc22a5) in human placenta. Drug Metabol Dispos (2005) 33, 31–37.Google Scholar
Hahn, PDevelopment of lipid metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr (1982) 2, 91–111.Google Scholar
King, RH, Mullan, BP, Dunshea, FR & Dove, HThe influence of piglet body weight on milk production of sows. Livest Prod Sci (1997) 47, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahjouji, K, Elimrani, I, Lafond, J, Leduc, L, Qureshi, IA & Mitchell, GAL-carnitine transport in human placental brush-border membranes is mediated by the sodium-dependent organic cation transporter OCTN2. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2004) 287, C263–C269.Google Scholar
McGarry, JD, Foster, DWAn improved and simplified radioisotopic assay for the determination of free and esterified carnitine. J Lip Res (1976) 17, 277–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musser, RE, Dritz, SS, Goodband, RD, Tokach, MD, Davis, MD, Nelssen, JL, Owen, KQ, Hanni, S, Bauman, JS & Heintz, MAdded L-carnitine in sow gestation diet improves carcass characteristics of the offspring 78 Suppl. J Anim Sci (2000) 2, 30.Google Scholar
Musser, RE, Goodband, RD, Owen, KQ, Davis, MD, Tokach, MD, Dritz, SS & Nelssen, JLDetermining the effect of increasing L-carnitine additions on sow performance and muscle fiber development of the offspring 79 Suppl. J Anim Sci (2001) 2, 65.Google Scholar
Musser, RE, Goodband, RD, Tokach, MD, Owen, KQ, Nelssen, JL, Blum, SA, Campbell, RG, Smits, R, Dritz, SS & Civis, CAEffects of L-carnitine fed during lactation on sow and litter performance. J Anim Sci (1999 a) 77, 3296–3303.Google Scholar
Musser, RE, Goodband, RD, Tokach, MD, Owen, KQ, Nelssen, JL, Blum, SA, Dritz, SS & Civis, CAEffects of L-carnitine fed during gestation and lactation on sow and litter performance. J Anim Sci (1999 b) 77, 3289–3295.Google Scholar
Novak, M, Monkus, EF, Chung, D & Buch, MCarnitine in the perinatal metabolism of lipids. I. Relationship between maternal and fetal plasma levels of carnitine and acylcarnitines. Pediatrica (1981) 67, 95–100.Google Scholar
Novak, M, Penn-Walker, D, Hahn, P & Monkus, EFEffect of carnitine on lipolysis in subcutaneous adipose tissue of newborns. Biol Neonate (1975 a) 25, 84–94.Google Scholar
Novak, M, Penn-Walker, D & Monkus, EFOxidation of fatty acids by mitochondria obtained from newborn subcutaneous (white) adipose tissue. Biol Neonate (1975 b) 25, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluske, JR & Dong, GZ Factors influencing the utilization of colostrums and milk. In The Lactating Sow, pp [Verstegen, MWA, Moughan, PJ & Schrama, JW, editor]. Wageningen. The Netherlands: Wageningen Pers. (1998) 45–70.Google Scholar
Ramanau, A, Kluge, H, Eder, KEffects of L-carnitine supplementation on milk production, litter gains and backfat thickness in sows with a low energy and protein intake during lactation. Br J Nutr (2005) 93, 717–721.Google Scholar
Ramanau, A, Kluge, H, Spilke, J & Eder, KReproductive performance of sows supplemented with dietary L-carnitine over three reproductive cycles. Arch Anim Nutr (2002) 56, 287–296.Google Scholar
Ramanau, A, Kluge, H, Spilke, J & Eder, KSupplementation of sows with L-carnitine during pregnancy and lactation improves growth of the piglets during the suckling period through increased milk production. J Nutr (2004) 134, 86–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinka, M, Illmann, G, Algers, B & Stetkova, ZThe role of nursing frequency in milk production in domestic pigs. J Anim Sci (1997) 75, 1223–1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warshaw, JB, Curry, EComparison of serum carnitine and ketone body concentrations in breast- and in formula-fed newborn infants. J Pediatr (1980) 97, 122–125.Google Scholar