Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T02:20:42.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of sodium intake on lactation and Na levels in body fluids of Blackface ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Isobel C. Vincent
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Production, Royal Veterinary CollegeBoltons Park, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire EN6 1NB
H. Ll. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Production, Royal Veterinary CollegeBoltons Park, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire EN6 1NB
R. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Production, Royal Veterinary CollegeBoltons Park, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire EN6 1NB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A low-sodium diet was given to Blackface ewes over two reproductive seasons; the diet provided 3–7 mmol Na daily, except for the period of lactation, when Na intake was increased to around 11 mmol/d. The diet of the control ewes was supplemented with sodium chloride to provide the recommended allowance of about ten times the level in the experimental low-Na diet.

2. Milk production was assessed during the first 2 months of lactation from incremental changes in the live weight of lambs during controlled sucking periods. Na and potassium were determined in milk and also in plasma, saliva and urine.

3. Neither yield nor concentration of Na and K in milk was affected by the level of Na in the diet. These results were supported by the similarity in live-weight gain of lambs in both years regardless of diet.

4. Plasma Na and K concentrations were not affected by the level of dietary Na. Na concentration in saliva and urine was significantly lower in the treated than in the control ewes, and K concentration in saliva was significantly higher.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 2, Ruminants. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Ashton, W. H. & Yousef, I. M. (1966). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 67, 7780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1976). Nutrient Allowances and Composition of Feedingstuffs for Ruminants, Booklet no. 2087. Pinner, Middlesex: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Morris, J. G. & Peterson, R. G. (1975). Journal of Nutrition 105, 595598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. B. (1957). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 48, 387411.Google Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1968 a). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 8794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1968 b). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 331338.Google Scholar
Perkin–Elmer (1973). Clinical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Norwalk, Connecticut, USA: Perkin–Elmer.Google Scholar
Perkin–Elmer (1976). Analytical Methods, for Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Norwalk, Connecticut, USA: Perkin–Elmer.Google Scholar
Perrin, D. R. (1958). Journal of Dairy Research 25, 7074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Agricultural Colleges (1978). Nutrient Allowances for Cattle and Sheep. Scottish Agricultural Colleges Publication no. 29.Google Scholar
Smith, S. E. & Aines, P. D. (1959). Cornell University Agricultural Experimental Station, Bulletin no. 938.Google Scholar
Vincent, I. C. (1983). A study of nutritional factors influencing reproduction and growth in Blackface sheep in the Colombian Andes, with particular reference to the effect of dietary sodium. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar