Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:41:56.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of soluble dietary fibre on the viscosity of gastrointestinal contents and the acute glycaemic response in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. Cameron-Smith
Affiliation:
Departrneni of Human Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3217, Australia
G. R. Collier
Affiliation:
Departrneni of Human Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3217, Australia
K. O'dea
Affiliation:
Departrneni of Human Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3217, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The postprandial glycaemic response following a meal is reduced with the addition of soluble dietary fibre. The reductions in the glycaemia are thought to be due largely to increased viscosity of the gastrointestinal (GI) contents retarding digestion and absorption. The aims of the present study were to determine the effect that the GI tract has on the viscosity of meals containing different soluble fibres and to determine whether the glycaemic response of a meal (containing the soluble fibre) was predicted by the viscosity of the digesta in the small intestine. High carbohydrate diets containing 70 g soluble fibre (guar gum, xanthan gum or methylcellulose)/kg or 70 g insoluble fibre (wheat bran)/kg were diluted in water to a final fibre concentration of 18 g/kg. Following dilution the wheat bran diet had no measurable viscosity, while the viscosities of the soluble fibre diets were elevated. When the diets were fed to male Sprague–Dawley rats for 2 weeks the viscosities of the stomach and small intestinal digesta were not predicted by the viscosity of the diets measured before ingestion The action of the GI tract on the viscosity of the soluble fibres was investigated in vitro by dilution of the diets with acidic and neutralizing solutions, mimicking gastric and duodenal secretions. Dilution of diets with either acidic and neutralizing solutions or saline control significantly lowered the viscosity of all diets, while alterations in the pH of the diets had little impact on the resultant viscosity. When fasted rats were orally administered with the differing diets (0.25 g carbohydrate/kg body weight), the postprandial glucose response was reduced following the soluble-fibre-containing meals when compared with the wheat bran-supplemented meal, although the reduction in glycaemia only reached statistical significance with xanthan supplementation. These results indicate that there are large changes in the viscosity of a meal containing soluble fibre following ingestion, and that dilution of the diet by GI secretions is important in determining the resultant viscosity in the small intestine. Furthermore, the large differences in viscosity of the GI contents following consumption of the diets containing the soluble fibres were not predictive of the postprandial glycaemic response.

Type
Fffects of viscosity on the glycaemic response
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1994

References

REFERENCES

American Institute of Nutrition (1977). Report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc committee on standards for nutritional studies. Journal qf Nutrition 107, 13401348.Google Scholar
Blackburn, N. A. & Johnson, I. T. (1981). The effect of guar gum on the viscosity of the gastrointestinal contents and on glucose uptake from the perfused jejunum in the rat. Brirish Journal of Nutrition 46, 239246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, N. A. & Johnson, I. T. (1983). The influence of guar gum on the movements of inulin, glucose and fluid in the rat intestine during perfusion in vivo. Pfl¨gers Archiv 397, 144148.Google Scholar
Blackburn, N. A., Redfurn, J. S., Jarjis, H., Holgate, A. M., Hanning, I., Scarpello, J. H. B., Johnson, I. T. & Read, N. W. (1984). The mechanisms of action of guar gum in improving glucose tolerance in man. Clinical Science 66, 329336.Google Scholar
Bueno, L., Praddaude, F., Fioramonti, J. & Ruckebusch, Y. (1981). Effect of dietary fiber on gastrointestinal motility and jejunal transit in dogs. Gastroenterology 80, 701707.Google Scholar
Caspary, W. F., Elsenhans, B., Sufke, U., Ptok, M., Blume, R., Lembcke, B. & Creutzfeldt, W. (1980). Effect of dietary fiber on absorption and mortility. Frontiers in Hormone Research 7, 202217.Google Scholar
Ebihara, K., Masuhara, R., Kiriyama, S. & Manabe, M. (1981). Correlation between viscosity and plasma glucose- and insulin-flattening activities of pectins from vegetables and fruits in rats. Nurrition Reports international 23, 985992.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A., Blackburn, N. A., Craigen, L., Davison, P., Tomlin, J., Sugden, K., Johnson, I. T. & Read, N. W. (1987). Viscosity of food gums determined in-vitro related to their hypoglycemic actions. Aniericun Journal of Clinical Nutrition 46, 7277.Google Scholar
Ellis, P. R., Morris, E. R. & Low, A. G. (1986). Guar gum: the importance of reporting data on its physicochemical properties. Diabetic Medicine 3, 490491.Google Scholar
Flourie, B., Vidon, N., Florent, C. H. & Bernier, J. J. (1984). Effect of pectin on jejunal glucose absorption and unstirred layer thickness in normal men. Gut 25, 936941.Google Scholar
Goulder, T. J., Alberti, K. G. M. M. & Jenkins, D. A. (1978). Effect of added fiber on the glucose and metabolic response to a mixed meal in normal and diabetic subjects. Diubetes Cure 1, 351355.Google Scholar
Ikegami, S., Tsuchihashi, F., Harada, H., Tsuchihashi, N., Nishide, E. & Innami, S. (1990). Effect of viscous indigestible polysaccharides on pancreatic-biliary secretion and digestive organs in rats. Journal of Nutrition 120, 353360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, D. J. A., Leeds, A. R., Gassull, M. A., Cochet, B. & Alberti, K. G. M. M. (1977). Decrease in postprandial insulin and glucose concentrations by guar and pectin. Annals of Internal Medicine 86, 2023.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. J. A., Wolever, T. M. S., Leeds, A. R., Gassull, M. A., Haisman, P., Dilawari, J., Goff, D. V., Metz, G. L. & Alberti, K. G. M. M. (1978). Dietary fibres, fibre analogues, and glucose tolerance; importance of viscosity. British Medical Journul 1, 13921394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, E. K., Gee, J. M., Brown, J. C., Wood, P. J. & Johnson, I. T. (1989). Effect of oat gum on the physical properties of the gastrointestinal contents and on the uptake of D-galactose and cholesterol by rat small intestine in vitro. Erirish Journat of Nutrition 62. 91101.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, N., Tredger, J. & Morgan, L. (1987). Viscosity differences between various guar gums. Diubetologia 20, 612615.Google Scholar
Sambrook, I. E. (1981). Studies on the flow and composition of bile in growing pigs. Journul of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 781791.Google Scholar
Schemann, M. & Ehrlein, H. J. (1986). Postprandial patterns of canine jejunal motility and transit of luminal content. Gustroenterology 90, 9911000.Google Scholar
Sherman, P. (1970). industrial Rheology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Topping, D. L., Oakenfull, D., Trimble, R. P. & Illman, R. J. (1988). A viscous fibre (methylcellulose) lowers blood glucose and plasma triacylglycerols and increases liver glycogen independently of volatile fatty acid production in the rat. British Journul of Nutrilion 59, 2130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torsdottir, I., Alpsten, M., Anderson, H. & Einarrsson, S. (1989). Dietary guar gum effects on postprandial blood glucose, insulin and hydroxyproline in humans. Journal of Nutrition 119, 19251931.Google Scholar
Welch, I. Me. L. & Worlding, J. (1986). The effect of ileal infusion of lipid on the motility pattern in humans after ingestion of a viscous, nonnutrient meal. Journul of Physiology 378, 12P.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T., Low, A. G. & Zebrowska, H. (1983). Studies on gastric digestion of protein and carbohydrate, gastric secretion and exocrine pancreatic secretion in the growing pig. British Journal of Nutrition 49, 401410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed