Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effect of monensin on the fermentation of basal rations in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)

  • R. J. Wallace (a1), J. W. Czerkawski (a2) and Grace Breckenridge (a2)

Abstract

1. A long-term experiment was made with the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec), in which the fermentation of a mixed ration of hay (1Og/d) and bruised barley (5g/d) was compared with the fermentation of the same diet in the presence of 2, 10 and 50 mg monensin/d.

2. Monensin depressed the production of acetic and butyric acids, markedly increased the production of propionic acid and virtually eliminated the production of isovaleric acid. The production of methane was decreased in the presence of monensin, but this decrease could be accounted for entirely by the changes in the production of volatile fatty acids and redistribution of metabolic hydrogen.

3. The digestibility of dry matter (DM) in the rations declined in the presence of monensin. Determinations of the rates of digestion showed that the digestion of the readily-fermented food in the initial stages was not affected by monensin, but that at 24 h digestion had been inhibited by monensin. The inhibition was due entirely to its effect on the digestion of the fibrous components. Digestion of non-fibrous material was not affected.

4. The efficiency of microbial growth, expressed as g dry weight/mol ATP formed (YATP) and in terms of dm digested, tended to be increased by monensin. This however occurred only at high, non-practical doses.

5. Urease (EC 3.5.1.5) was induced by the addition of urea to the fermentation, but monensin had no effect on urease activity. Although monensin increased the activity of protease in washed suspensions, more food protein apparently escaped degradation. This may have been due to decreased deaminative activity.

6. Monensin altered the mircroscopic appearance of the fermentation fluid, and changed the activity of some enzymes in sonicated extracts, including alkaline phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.1), acetate kinase (EC 2.7.2.1) and succinate dehydrogenase (EC 1.3.9.1). These results are discussed in terms of known sensitivities of rumen microbes to monensin and their contribution to the fermentation as a whole.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Effect of monensin on the fermentation of basal rations in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Effect of monensin on the fermentation of basal rations in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Effect of monensin on the fermentation of basal rations in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Allen, J. D. & Harrison, D. G. (1979). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38, 32A.
Baile, C. A., McLaughlin, C. L., Potter, E. L. & Chalupa, W. (1979). J. Anim. Sci. 48, 1501.
Baldwin, R. L. & Palmquist, D. L. (1965). Appl. Microbiol. 13, 194.
Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1964). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63, 113.
Chalupa, W. (1980). In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, p. 325 [Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P. editors]. Lancaster, England: MTP Press Ltd.
Chalupa, W., Corbett, W. & Bre:hour, J. R. (1980). J. Anim. Sci. 51, 170.
Chen, M. & Wolin, M. J. (1979). Appl. environ. Microbiol. 38, 72.
Cheng, K.-J., Bailey, C. B., Wallace, R. J., Czerkawski, J. W., & Costerton, J. W. (1979). Report of 15th Conference on Rumen FunctionChicagoNov. 28–29, 1979.
Cheng, K.-J. & Costerton, J. W. (1977 a). J. Bacteriol. 129, 1506.
Cheng, K.-J. & Costerton, J. W. (1977 b). Appl. environ. Microbiol. 34, 586.
Cook, A. R. (1976). J. gen Microbiol. 92, 32.
Coombe, J. B., Dinius, D. A., Goering, H. K. & Oltjen, R. R. (1979). J. Anim. Sci. 48, 1223.
Czerkawski, J. W. (1978). J. Dairy Sci. 61, 1261.
Czerkawski, J. W. (1979). Compartmentation in the rumen. The Hannah Research Institute Report pp. 69–85. Ayr, Scotland, KA6 5HL.
Czerkawski, J. W. & Breckenridge, G. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 38, 371.
Czerkawski, J. W. & Breckenridge, G. (1979 a). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 217.
Czerkawski, J. W. & Breckenridge, G. (1979 b). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 229.
Czerkawski, J. W., Christie, W. W., Breckenridge, G. & Hunter, M. L. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 25.
Dartt, R. M., Boling, J. A. & Bradley, N. W. (1978). J. Anim. Sci. 46, 345.
Demeyer, D. I. & Van Nevel, C. J. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 515.
Dinius, D. A., Simpson, M. E. & Marsh, P. B. (1976). J. Anim. Sci. 42, 229.
Dinsdale, D., Cheng, K.-J., Wallace, R. J. & Goodlad, R. A. (1980). Appl. environ. Microbiol. 39, 1059.
Fitzgerald, P. R. & Mansfield, M. E. (1978). Am. J. vet. Res. 39, 7.
Hammond, A. C., Carlson, J. R. & Breeze, R. G. (1978). Science 201, 153.
Haney, M. E. & Hoehn, M. M. (1967). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. p. 349.
Hanson, T. L. & Klopfenstein, T. (1979). J. Anim. Sci. 48, 474.
Horton, G. M. J. (1979). Ann. Rech. vét. 10, 335.
Horton, G. M. J. & Stockdale, P. H. G. (1979). Am. J. vet. Res. 40, 966.
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. New York and London: Academic Press.
Jarvis, B. D. W. (1968). Appl. Microbiol. 16, 714.
Jouany, J. P. & Senaud, J. (1978). Ann. Zootech. 27, 61.
Joyner, A. E., Brown, L. J., Fogg, T. J. & Rossi, R. T. (1979). J. Anim. Sci. 48, 1065.
Lemenager, R. P., Owens, F. N., Shockey, B. J., Lusby, K. S. & Totusek, R. (1978). J. Anim. Sci. 47, 255.
Leng, R. A., Steel, J. W. & Luick, J. R. (1967). Biochem. J. 103, 785.
McDougall, E. I. (1948). Biochem. J. 43, 99.
Nockels, C. F., Jackson, D. W. & Berry, B. W. (1978). J. Anim. Sci. 47, 788.
Oltjen, R. R., Dinius, D. A. & Goering, H. K. (1977). J. Anim. Sci. 45, 1442.
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A., Smith, J. S., Webster, A. J. F. & Corrigall, W. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 41, 541.
Poos, M. I., Hanson, T. L. & Klopfenstein, T. J. (1979). J. Anim. Sci. 48, 1516.
Raun, A. P., Cooley, C. O., Potter, E. L., Rathmacher, R. P. & Richardson, L. F. (1976). J. Anim. Sci. 43, 670.
Richardson, L. F., Raun, A. P., Potter, E. L., Cooley, C. O. & Rathmacher, R. P. (1976). J. Anim. Sci. 43, 657.
Rose, I. A., Grunberg-Manago, M., Korey, S. R. & Ochoa, S. (1954). J. biol. Chem. 211, 737.
Slyter, L. L. (1979). Appl. environ. Microbiol. 37, 283.
Stanier, G. & Davies, A. (1981). Br. J. Nutr. 45, 567.
Thornton, J. H., Owens, F. N., Lemenager, R. P. & Totusek, R. (1976). J. Anim. Sci. 43, 336.
Utley, P. R., Newton, G. L., Wilson, D. M. & McCormick, W. C. (1977). J. Anim. Sci. 45, 154.
Van Nevel, C. J. & Demeyer, D. I. (1977). Appl. environ. Microbiol. 34, 251.
Van Nevel, C. J. & Demeyer, D. I. (1979). Ann. Rech. vét. 10, 338.
Wallace, R. J. (1979). J. appl. Bacteriol. 47, 443.
Wallace, R. J., Cheng, K.-J. & Czerkawski, J. W. (1980). Appl. environ. Microbiol. 40, 672.

Effect of monensin on the fermentation of basal rations in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)

  • R. J. Wallace (a1), J. W. Czerkawski (a2) and Grace Breckenridge (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.