Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T15:33:33.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of an oral glucose load on serum free amino acid concentrations in children before and after treatment for kwashiorkor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. F. Grimble
Affiliation:
MRC Child Nutrition Unit, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
R. G. Whitehead
Affiliation:
MRC Child Nutrition Unit, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The mechanisms by which an oral dose of glucose can stimulate the uptake of essential amino acids from serum was found to be operative even in children with severe, untreated kwashiorkor.

2. Although the percentage fall in the concentration of the essential amino acids in response to glucose was the same before and after treatment, the absolute fall was greater on discharge. The results indicated that the magnitude of this fall might depend on the initial fasting concentration of each individual amino acid.

3. These results have been discussed on the basis of possible long-term pathological effects of a distorted serum amino acid pattern typified by low concentrations of valine, leucine and threonine. The protein-sparing action of carbohydrate, achieved by the preferential synthesis of muscle protein in response to insulin secretion, might be less effective because of substrate limitation.

4. Of the non-essential amino acids, the concentrations of alanine and glycine also fell markedly before treatment, but this did not occur on discharge. The significance of this difference is also discussed.

5. The results also indicate that slightly high, spurious amino acid ratios can be obtained if a child is given a drink containing sugar before a blood sample is taken.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

Coward, D. G., Sawyer, M. B. & Whitehead, R. G. (1970). Am. J. clin. Nutr. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Felig, P., Owen, O. E., Wahren, J. & Cahill, G. F. Jr (1969). J. clin. Invest. 48, 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimble, R. F. & Whitehead, R. G. (1970 a). In Technicon Quarterly. New York: Technicon Inc.Google Scholar
Grimble, R. F. & Whitehead, R. G. (1970 b). Lancet i, 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimble, R. F. & Whitehead, R. G. (1970 c). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadden, D. R. (1967). Lancet ii, 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. M. & Harris, R. S. (1947). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 64, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotspeich, W. D. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 179, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, K. L. & Young, F. G. (1961). Vitams Horm. 19, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1956). Scot. med. J. 1, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1964). In Mammalian Protein Metabolism Vol. 1, Ch. 10 [Munro, H. N. and Allison, J. B., editors]. New York and London: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Munro, H. N., Black, J. G. & Thomson, W. S. T. (1959). Br. J. Nutr. 13, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. & Thomson, W. S. T. (1953). Metabolism 2, 354.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, E. G. & Eastland, J. S. (1935). J. Lab. clin. Med. 20, I.Google Scholar
Staff, T. H. E. (1968). E. Afr. med. J. 45, 399.Google Scholar
Swendseid, M. E., Tuttle, S. G., Drenick, E. J., Joven, C. B. & Massey, F. J. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 20, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R. G. (1964). Lancet i, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar