Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Distribution and changes in urease (EC 3.5.1.5) activity in Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)

  • J. W. Czerkawski (a1) and Grace Breckenridge (a1)

Abstract

1. The Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec) was used in a series of long-term experiments to study the distribution and changes of urease (EC 3.5.1.5) activity in a heterogeneous fermentation system.

2. It was shown that in Rusitec the high urease activity from the inoculum decreased to low values, that the rate of decrease was consistent with simple dilution of ureolytic micro-organisms and that the urease activity could be restored to original values by infusion of urea into the reaction vessels. The magnitude of this urease activity was a direct function of the amounts of urea infused. Single daily additions of the same or greater amounts of urea in food or as solid failed to increase the urease activity significantly.

3. In general, urease activity increased 2–6 h after feeding and the increases were greater with roughage diets.

4. The ureolytic activity per unit volume was always higher in compartment 2 (space occupied by micro-organisms that are loosely associated with the solid) than in compartment 1 (strained rumen contents) or compartment 3 (space occupied by microbial population that cannot be washed out of the solid matrix).

5. The distribution of urease activity between the compartments was different from the distribution of certain other enzymes (e.g. protease and alkaline phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.1)).

6. Apart from the boundary region, the concentrations of urease, ammonia and volatile fatty acids in compartment 2 were constant, while the concentrations of protein, DNA and another enzyme (alkaline phosphatase) increased with the depth of the compartment. Specific urease activity (per unit weight of protein or DNA) was much higher in compartment 1 than in compartment 2 and it decreased markedly with depth of compartment.

7. The concentrations of ammonia were always much higher in the solid matrix (compartments 2 and 3) than in the free suspension of micro-organisms (compartment 1). There was a linear relation between these two quantities.

8. The results are discussed in relation to published work on the entry and metabolism of urea in the rumen.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Distribution and changes in urease (EC 3.5.1.5) activity in Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Distribution and changes in urease (EC 3.5.1.5) activity in Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Distribution and changes in urease (EC 3.5.1.5) activity in Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Allison, M. J. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 456 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press.
Brent, B. E., Adepoju, A. & Portela, F. (1971). J. Anim. Sci. 32, 794.
Brice, R. E. & Morrison, I. M. (1981). Proc. Nut. Soc. 40, 75A.
Burton, K. (1955). Biochem. J. 62, 315.
Chalupa, W. (1968). J. Anim. Sci. 27, 207.
Chalupa, W. (1972). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 31, 1152.
Chalupa, W., Clark, J., Opliger, P. & Lavker, R. (1970). J. Nutr. 100, 161.
Cheng, K.-J., Akin, D. E. & Costerton, J. W. (1977). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 36, 193.
Cheng, K.-J. & Costerton, J. W. (1977). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34, 586.
Cheng, K.-J. & Costerton, J. W. (1980). In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, p. 227 [Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P., editor]. Lancaster: MTP Press Limited.
Cheng, K.-J., Hironaka, R. & Costerton, J. W. (1976). Can. J. Microbiol. 22, 764.
Cheng, K.-J. & Wallace, R. J. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 553.
Cook, A. R. (1976). J. gen. Microbiol. 92, 32.
Crawford, R. J., Hoover, W. H. & Junkins, L. L. (1980). J. Anim. Sci. 51, 986.
Czerkawski, J. W. (1974). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 25, 45.
Czerkawski, J. W. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 36, 311.
Czerkawski, J. W. (1979). The Hannah Res. Inst. Report p. 69.
Czerkawski, J. W. & Breckenridge, G. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 38, 371.
Czerkawski, J. W. & Breckenridge, G. (1979 a). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 217.
Czerkawski, J. W. & Breckenridge, G. (1979 b). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 229.
Czerkawski, J. W., Christie, W. W., Breckenridge, G. & Hunter, M. L. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 25.
Czerkawski, J. W. & Clapperton, J. L. (1968). Lab. Pract. 17, 994.
Dinsdale, D., Cheng, K.-J., Wallace, R. J. & Goodlad, R. A. (1980). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39, 1059.
Erfle, J. D., Sauer, F. D. & Mahadevan, S. (1977). J. Dairy Sci. 60, 1064.
Houpt, T. R. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 119 [Phillipson, A. R., editor]. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press.
John, A., Isaacson, H. R. & Bryant, M. P. (1974). J. Dairy Sci. 57, 1003.
Jones, G. A. (1967). In Urea as a Protein Supplement, p. 111 [Briggs, M. H., editor]. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.
Kennedy, P. M. (1980). Br. J. Nutr. 43, 125.
Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1980). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 60, 205.
Mahadevan, S., Sauer, F. & Erfle, J. D. (1976). J. Anim. Sci. 42, 745.
Marty, R. J. & Demeyer, D. I. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 369.
Mehrez, A. Z., Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 38, 437.
Miller, E. L. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 79.
Obara, Y. & Shimbayashi, K. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 497.
Okorie, A. U., Buttery, P. J. & Lewis, D. (1977). Proc. Nut. Soc. 36, 39A.
Pearson, R. M. & Smith, J. A. B. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 148.
Rahman, A. S. & Decker, P. (1966). Nature, Lond. 209, 618.
Roffler, R. E. & Satter, L. D. (1975). J. Dairy Sci. 58, 1880.
Satter, L. D. & Slyter, L. L. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 199.
Senshu, T., Nakamura, K., Sawa, A., Miura, H. & Matsumoto, T. (1980). J. Dairy Sci. 63, 305.
Sigma Chemical Co. (1980 a). Technical Bulletin 104. St Louis, USA: Sigma Chemical Co.
Sigma Chemical Co. (1980 b). Technical Bulletin 535. St Louis, USA: Sigma Chemical Co.
Slyter, L. L., Oltjen, R. R., Kern, D. L. & Weaver, J. M. (1968). J. Nutr. 94, 185.
Smith, F. (1965). Meth. Biochem. Analysis 3, 180.
Smith, M. S. & Bryant, M. P. (1979). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 32, 149.
Stanier, G. & Davies, A. (1981). Br. J. Nutr. 45, 567.
Stern, M. D. & Hoover, W. H. (1979). J. Anim. Sci. 49, 1590.
Tillman, A. D. & Sidhu, K. S. (1968). J. Anim. Sci. 28, 689.
Toennies, G. & Feng, F. (1965). Analyt. Biochem. 11, 411.
Wallace, R. J. (1979). J. Appl. Bacteriol. 47, 443.
Wallace, R. J., Czerkawski, J. W. & Breckenridge, G. (1981). Br. J. Nutr. 46, 131.

Distribution and changes in urease (EC 3.5.1.5) activity in Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)

  • J. W. Czerkawski (a1) and Grace Breckenridge (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.