Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Differences in body compositions, growth and food intakes between mice which have been selected for a small and large body size

  • Garry J. Rucklidge (a1)

Abstract

1. Q-strain mice selected for high (QLF) or low (QSC) body-weight at 6 weeks of age were compared with respect to their body-weight increases, gross body compositions and food intakes.

2. DNA, RNA, protein and hydroxyproline contents were measured.

3. QLF animals were larger at all stages of development but ate more food and gained more body-weight per unit food intake with an apparently improved efficiency of utilization compared with QSC mice.

4. The efficiency of deposition of dietary energy in Q-strain mice was found to be significantly lower than that of other growing mammals receiving similar energy intakes.

5. Body water, protein and fat of both strains were similar at birth and at 42 d of age but the contribution of fat to body-weight in the preweaning phase was greater for QLF while QSC accreted more fat per unit weight gain in the postweaning period.

6. An increase in cell number made a greater contribution to the growth post partum of the QLF mice, but by 42 d of age little difference between the number of cells per unit weight in the two strains was evident.

7. Despite increases in RNA concentrations at all stages of development, of QLF mice compared with QSC, measurements of body composition do not indicate any accompanying increases of protein concentration in these animals.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Differences in body compositions, growth and food intakes between mice which have been selected for a small and large body size
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Differences in body compositions, growth and food intakes between mice which have been selected for a small and large body size
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Differences in body compositions, growth and food intakes between mice which have been selected for a small and large body size
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aberle, E. D. & Doolittle, D. P. (1976). Growth 40, 133.
Atkinson, T., Fowler, V. R. F., Garton, G. A. & Lough, A. K. (1972). Analyst, Lond. 97, 562.
Benedict, F. G. (1938). Vital Energetics. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Blaxter, K. L. (1972). In Festskrift til Knut Breirem p. 19 [Spildo, L. S., Homb, T. and Hvidsten, H., editors]. Oslo: Mariendals Boktrykkeri A. S. Gjøvidk.
Brown, M. A. & Frahm, R. R. (1975). J. Anim. Sci. 41, 1002.
Brown, M. A., Frahm, R. R. & Johnson, R. R. (1977). J. Anim. Sci. 45, 19.
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). Analyst, Lond. 95, 181.
Eisen, E. J., Hayes, J. F., Allen, C. E., Bakker, H. & Nagai, J. (1978). Growth 42, 7.
Ezekwe, M. O. & Martin, R. J. (1975). Growth 39, 95.
Falconer, D. S. (1973). Genet. Res., Camb. 22, 291.
Falconer, D. S. (1977). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36, 47.
Falconer, D. S., Gauld, I. K. & Roberts, R. C. (1978). Genet. Res. Camb. 31, 287.
Firschein, H. E. & Shill, J. P. (1966). Analyt. Biochem. 14, 296.
Hanrahan, J. P., Hooper, A. C. & McCarthy, J. C. (1973). Anim. Prod. 16, 7.
Kielanowski, J. (1972). In Festskrift til Knut Breirem p. 111 [Spildo, L. S., Homb, T. and Hvidsten, H., editors]. Oslo: Mariendals Boktrykkeri A. S. Gjøvidk.
Kownacki, M. & Keller, J. (1978). Genetica Polonica 19, 339.
Kownacki, M., Keller, J. & Gebler, E. (1975). Genetica Polonica 16, 359.
Luff, A. R. & Goldspink, G. (1967). Life Sci. 6, 1821.
Martin, R., White, J., Herbein, J. & Ezekwe, M. O. (1979). Growth 43, 167.
Miller, D. S. & Bender, A. E. (1955). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 382.
Munro, H. N. & Fleck, A. (1969). In Mammalian Protein Metabolism pp. 423525 [Munro, H., editor]. New York: Academic Press.
Needham, A. E. (1964). In The growth process in animals. London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd.
Priestley, G. C. & Robertson, M. S. M. (1973). Genet. Res., Camb. 22, 255.
Pullar, J. D. & Webster, A. J. F. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 35, 355.
Reeds, P. J., Cadenhead, A., Fuller, M. F., Lobley, G. E. & McDonald, J. D. (1980). Br. J. Nutr. 43, 445.
Robinson, D. W. & Bradford, G. E. (1969). Growth 33, 221.
Rucklidge, G. J. & McKenzie, J. D. (1980). Lab. Animals 14, 213.
Usinger, W. (1957). Arch. für Physiol. 265, 365.
Van der Wal, H., Verstegen, M. W. A. & Van der Hel, W. (1976). In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, pp. 125128 [Vermorel, M., editor]. Clermont Ferrand: G. de Bussac.
Winick, M. & Noble, A. (1966). J. Nutr. 89, 300.

Differences in body compositions, growth and food intakes between mice which have been selected for a small and large body size

  • Garry J. Rucklidge (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.