1 Thompson, FE, Subar, AF, Loria, CM, et al. (2010) Need for technological innovation in dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 48–51.
2 Long, JD, Littlefield, LA, Estep, G, et al. (2009) Evidence review of technology and dietary assessment. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs .
3 Ngo, J, Engelen, A, Molag, M, et al. (2009) A review of the use of information and communication technologies for dietary assessment. Br J Nutr 101, Suppl. 2, S102–S112.
4 Baranowski, T, Islam, N, Baranowski, J, et al. (2002) The food intake recording software system is valid among fourth-grade children. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 380–385.
5 Vereecken, CA, Covents, M, Sichert-Hellert, W, et al. (2008) Development and evaluation of a self-administered computerized 24-h dietary recall method for adolescents in Europe. Int J Obes (Lond) 32, Suppl. 5, S26–S34.
6 Zoellner, J, Anderson, J & Gould, SM (2005) Comparative validation of a bilingual interactive multimedia dietary assessment tool. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 1206–1214.
7 Schatzkin, A, Subar, AF, Moore, S, et al. (2009) Observational epidemiologic studies of nutrition and cancer: the next generation (with better observation). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18, 1026–1032.
8 Subar, AF, Thompson, FE, Potischman, N, et al. (2007) Formative research of a quick list for an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 1002–1007.
9 Subar, AF, Crafts, J, Zimmerman, TP, et al. (2010) Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 55–64.
10 Zimmerman, TP, Hull, SG, McNutt, S, et al. (2009) Challenges in converting an interviewer-administered food probe database to self-administration in the National Cancer Institute automated self-administered 24-hour recall (ASA24). J Food Compost Anal 22, S48–S51.
11 Forbes, LE, Storey, KE, Fraser, SN, et al. (2009) Dietary patterns associated with glycemic index and glycemic load among Alberta adolescents. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 34, 648–658.
12 Lu, C, Pearson, M, Renker, S, et al. (2006) A novel system for collecting longitudinal self-reported dietary consumption information: the internet data logger (iDL). J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 16, 427–433.
13 Simunaniemi, AM, Andersson, A & Nydahl, M (2009) Fruit and vegetable consumption close to recommendations. A partly web-based nationwide dietary survey in Swedish adults. Food Nutr Res 53 .
14 Hanning, RM, Royall, D, Toews, JE, et al. (2009) Web-based food behaviour questionnaire: validation with grades six to eight students. Can J Diet Pract Res 70, 172–178.
15 Touvier, M, Mejean, C, Kesse-Guyot, E, et al. (2010) Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur J Epidemiol 25, 287–296.
16 Hercberg, S, Preziosi, P, Briancon, S, et al. (1998) A primary prevention trial using nutritional doses of antioxidant vitamins and minerals in cardiovascular diseases and cancers in a general population: the SU.VI.MAX study – design, methods, and participant characteristics. SUpplementation en VItamines et Mineraux AntioXydants. Control Clin Trials 19, 336–351.
17 Le Moullec, N, Deheeger, M, Preziosi, P, et al. (1996) Validation of the portion size booklet used in the SU.VI.MAX study (article in French). Cah Nutr Diet 31, 158–164.
18 Hercberg, S (coordinator) (2005) Table de composition SU.VI.MAX des aliments (SU.VI.MAX Food Composition Table). Paris: Les éditions INSERM/Economica.
19 Winer, B (1971) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd ed. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill and Kogakusha.
20 Shrout, PE & Fleiss, JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86, 420–428.
21 Willett, WC (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
22 Gibson, R (2005) Principles of Nutritional Assessment, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23 Margetts, BM & Nelson, M (1997) Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24 Lefever, S, Dal, M & Matthiasdottir, A (2007) Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. Br J Educ Technol 38, 574–582.
25 Bexelius, C, Honeth, L, Ekman, A, et al. (2008) Evaluation of an internet-based hearing test – comparison with established methods for detection of hearing loss. J Med Internet Res 10, e32.
26 Ekman, A, Dickman, PW, Klint, A, et al. (2006) Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol 21, 103–111.
27 Kendler, KS, Myers, J, Potter, J, et al. (2009) A web-based study of personality, psychopathology and substance use in twin, other relative and relationship pairs. Twin Res Hum Genet 12, 137–141.
28 Etter, JF & Perneger, TV (2001) A comparison of cigarette smokers recruited through the Internet or by mail. Int J Epidemiol 30, 521–525.
29 Klovning, A, Sandvik, H & Hunskaar, S (2009) Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey. J Clin Epidemiol 62, 1068–1074.
30 Edwards, SL, Slattery, ML, Murtaugh, MA, et al. (2007) Development and use of touch-screen audio computer-assisted self-interviewing in a study of American Indians. Am J Epidemiol 165, 1336–1342.
31 Boeckner, LS, Pullen, CH, Walker, SN, et al. (2002) Use and reliability of the World Wide Web version of the Block Health Habits and History Questionnaire with older rural women. J Nutr Educ Behav 34, Suppl. 1, S20–S24.
32 Probst, YC, Faraji, S, Batterham, M, et al. (2008) Computerized dietary assessments compare well with interviewer administered diet histories for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the primary healthcare setting. Patient Educ Couns 72, 49–55.
33 Thompson, FE & Subar, AF (2008) Dietary assessment methodology. In Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease, 2nd ed., pp. 3–39 [Coulston, AM and Boushey, CJ, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34 Vance, VA, Woodruff, SJ, McCargar, LJ, et al. (2009) Self-reported dietary energy intake of normal weight, overweight and obese adolescents. Public Health Nutr 12, 222–227.
35 Kipnis, V, Midthune, D, Freedman, L, et al. (2002) Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr 5, 915–923.
36 Lewis, KD & Burton-Freeman, BM (2010) The role of innovation and technology in meeting individual nutritional needs. J Nutr 140, 426S–436S.
37 Papadaki, A & Scott, JA (2005) The Mediterranean eating in Scotland experience project: evaluation of an Internet-based intervention promoting the Mediterranean diet. Br J Nutr 94, 290–298.