Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T17:26:46.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative analysis of effects of dietary arachidonic acid and EPA on growth, tissue fatty acid composition, antioxidant response and lipid metabolism in juvenile grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idellus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2017

Jing-jing Tian
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510380, People’s Republic of China
Cai-xia Lei
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, People’s Republic of China
Hong Ji*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, People’s Republic of China
Gen Kaneko
Affiliation:
School of Arts & Sciences, University of Houston-Victoria, Victoria, TX 77901, USA
Ji-shu Zhou
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, People’s Republic of China
Hai-bo Yu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, People’s Republic of China
Yang Li
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, People’s Republic of China
Er-meng Yu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510380, People’s Republic of China
Jun Xie
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510380, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Professor H. Ji, fax +86 029 87092585, email jihong@nwsuaf.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four isonitrogenous and isoenergetic purified diets containing free arachidonic acid (ARA) or EPA (control group), 0·30 % ARA, 0·30 % EPA and 0·30 % ARA+EPA (equivalent) were designed to feed juvenile grass carp (10·21 (sd 0·10) g) for 10 weeks. Only the EPA group presented better growth performance compared with the control group (P<0·05). Dietary ARA and EPA were incorporated into polar lipids more than non-polar lipids in hepatopancreas but not intraperitoneal fat (IPF) tissue. Fish fed ARA and EPA showed an increase of serum superoxide dismutase and catalase activities, and decrease of glutathione peroxidase activity and malondialdehyde contents (P<0·05). The hepatopancreatic TAG levels decreased both in ARA and EPA groups (P<0·05), accompanied by the decrease of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity in the ARA group (P<0·05). Fatty acid synthase (FAS), diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase and apoE gene expression in the hepatopancreas decreased in fish fed ARA and EPA, but only the ARA group exhibited increased mRNA level of adipose TAG lipase (ATGL) (P<0·05). Decreased IPF index and adipocyte sizes were found in the ARA group (P<0·05). Meanwhile, the ARA group showed decreased expression levels of adipogenic genes CCAAT enhancer-binding protein α, LPL and FAS, and increased levels of the lipid catabolic genes PPARα, ATGL, hormone-sensitive lipase and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT-1) in IPF, whereas the EPA group only increased PPARα and CPT-1 mRNA expression and showed less levels than the ARA group. Overall, dietary EPA is beneficial to the growth performance, whereas ARA is more potent in inducing lipolysis and inhibiting adipogenesis, especially in IPF. Meanwhile, dietary ARA and EPA showed the similar preference in esterification and the improvement in antioxidant response.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 

Long-chain PUFA (LC-PUFA), such as EPA (20 : 5n-3), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA, 22 : 5n-3), DHA (22 : 6n-3) and arachidonic acid (ARA, 20 : 4n-6), play unique roles in controlling and regulating growth performance, cell membrane fluidity, lipid metabolism and immune function in fish( Reference Higgs and Dong 1 Reference Tian, Ji and Oku 4 ). Among these fatty acids, ARA and EPA are the two main C20 LC-PUFA, which are the precursors for one of the most important groups of bioactive lipid mediators, the eicosanoids( Reference Bell and Sargent 5 Reference Yin, Zhou and Zhu 7 ). There exists three enzymatic routes for the synthesis of eicosanoids: the cyclo-oxygenase (COX) pathway, the lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway and the cytochrome 450 pathway( Reference Funk 8 , Reference Wang and DuBois 9 ). ARA shows similar structure with EPA but lacks one double bond located at the third carbon from the n end, and it is believed that these two fatty acids compete for binding to the eicosanoid synthesis enzymes such as COX or LOX( Reference Tocher 6 , Reference Hamre, Moren and Solbakken 10 ). In mammals, ARA is the chief precursor of eicosanoids, which generate two-series prostanoids (PG) and 4-series leukotrienes (LT), whereas EPA converted to 3-series PG and 5-series LT; these metabolites from EPA are generally less biologically active than the corresponding metabolites from ARA( Reference Tocher 6 , Reference Halver and Hardy 11 ). However, some recent studies have shown a similar activity of ARA-derived PGE2 and EPA-derived PGE3 such as in endothelial cells( Reference Moreno 12 , Reference Rodríguez-Lagunas, Ferrer and Moreno 13 ). Moreover, the sn-2 position of fish phosphoinositides (PI) has a distinct preference for C20 PUFA, and the existence of a competition between ARA and EPA during phospholipid esterification has also been suggested, especially in PI( Reference Halver and Hardy 11 , Reference Fountoulaki, Alexis and Nengas 14 ). However, ARA and EPA are also very susceptible to be attacked by O2 radicals and other organic radicals, resulting in serious consequences for cell membrane structure and fluidity( Reference Tocher 6 ). Several enzyme systems exist for the possible protection of membrane LC-PUFA in fish, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px)( Reference Tocher 6 ).

Studies have shown that ARA has unique roles in regulating stress resistance( Reference Atalah, Hernández-Cruz and Ganuza 15 Reference Montero, Terova and Rimoldi 18 ), immune response( Reference Xu, Ai and Mai 19 Reference Shahkar, Yun and Lee 21 ), reproductive performance( Reference Norambuena, Estévez and Mañanós 22 Reference Xu, Cao and Zhang 24 ), pigmentation( Reference Villalta, Estévez and Bransden 25 Reference Wishkerman, Boglino and Darias 27 ), morphogenesis( Reference Lie, Kvalheim and Rasinger 28 , Reference Boglino, Darias and Estévez 29 ) and fatty acid metabolism( Reference Norambuena, Morais and Emery 30 , Reference Norambuena, Rombenso and Turchini 31 ) of fish. Recently, we have shown that moderate dietary ARA (0·30 %) decreased lipid accumulation and lipogenic gene expression levels in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus)( Reference Tian, Ji and Oku 4 ). It has already been further demonstrated that the COX pathway is responsible for the improvement of lipid catabolic genes rather than lipogenic genes by using COX inhibitor acetylsalicylic acid( Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 32 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 33 ). In addition, it has also been demonstrated that n-3 LC-PUFA, including EPA, could decrease the lipid deposition and increase the capacity of lipolysis in this fish species( Reference Ji, Li and Liu 3 , Reference Liu, Li and Huang 34 , Reference Li, Liu and Ji 35 ). These studies indicated that both n-6 and n-3 LC-PUFA played peculiar roles in regulating lipid metabolism of grass carp, whereas the efficacy of these two fatty acids, such as ARA and EPA, remains largely unknown.

Grass carp, a typical herbivorous freshwater fish species that is widely cultured in China, easily accumulates excessive fat in the abdominal cavity and suffers from fatty liver in aquaculture( Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 32 , Reference Tian, Lu and Ji 36 ). It is worth noting that grass carp could synthesise LC-PUFA from linoleic acid (LA) and α-linolenic acid (LNA) via its desaturase and elongase multienzyme complexes( Reference Glencross 37 , Reference Tocher 38 ). ARA is an end product of the n-6 series fatty acids, whereas EPA is easily converted to DHA, which is the end product of the n-3 series fatty acids( Reference Tocher 6 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 39 ). Thus, ARA and EPA should have different patterns for deposition in tissues of this fish species, which might further differently affect physiological functions, such as lipid metabolism. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of dietary ARA and EPA on the lipid accumulation in grass carp. Four purified diets containing different fatty acids (ARA or EPA) were designed to feed grass carp for 10 weeks, and the growth, tissue fatty acid composition, antioxidant response and lipid metabolism were evaluated, with the purpose of providing reference for the use of these two fatty acids in aquaculture industry.

Material and methods

Experimental diets

Four isonitrogenous and isoenergetic semipurified diets containing 36·0 % crude protein and 6·0 % crude lipid were formulated, based on the method of Lavell with some modifications( Reference Lavell 40 ). Soyabean oil (Kerry Oils & Grains Co.) and linseed oil (Hoval Seasons Bio-Sci Co.) were added to satisfy the 1 % LA and 1 % LNA requirements, respectively( Reference Glencross 37 ) (Table 1). The control diet was ARA-free, whereas the other three diets were added with ARA-enriched oil (ARA content, approximately 40·8 % of total fatty acid; in the form of ARA-methylester; Hubei Fuxing Biotechnology Co., Ltd) or EPA-enriched oil (EPA content, approximately 62 % of total fatty acid; Xunda Marine Bio-Pro Co.) at the expense of lard oil (purchased from Kangle Market) to meet the 0·30 % ARA content, 0·30 % EPA content and 0·30 % ARA+EPA (equivalent), respectively. A measure of 0·1 % butylated hydroxytoluene (Sigma-Aldrich) was added as the antioxidant (Table 1). The fatty acid compositions of the experimental diets were determined by GC and are given in Table 2.

Table 1 Formulation and chemical composition of the experimental diets (g/kg DM)

ARA, arachidonic acid ; BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene.

* The mineral mix contained the following (g/100 g of the total mineral): KAl(SO4), 0·159; CaCO3, 18·101; Ca(H2PO4)2, 44·601; CoCl, 0·070; MgSO4, 5·216; MnSO4.H2O, 0·070; KCl, 16·553; KI, 0·014; ZnCO3, 0·192; NaH2PO4, 13·605; Na2SeO3, 0·006; CuSO4.5H2O, 0·075; ferric citrate, 1·338.

The vitamin mix contained the following (mg/1000 g of diet): vitamin C, 200; thiamine, 10; riboflavin, 20; vitamin A, 7·5; vitamin E, 500; vitamin D3, 0·5; menadione, 10; pyridoxine HCl, 10; cyanocobalamin, 0·02; biotin, 1·0; calcium pantothenate, 40; folic acid, 5; niacin, 20; inositol, 400; choline chloride, 2000; and cellulose was used as a carrier.

Table 2 Fatty acid composition of the experimental diets (percentage of total fatty acids)

ARA, arachidonic acid.

Ingredients were mixed by hand and approximately 70 % water was added to make a dough, and the dough was then pressed to obtain noodle-like pellets with a diameter of 2 mm. The pellets were dried under forced air at room temperature for 24 h, which were then kept at –20°C until use.

Experimental procedure

Juvenile grass carps were obtained from the Ankang Fisheries Experimental and Demonstration Station of Northwest A&F University (Ankang, China). Fish were reared in the aquaria and fed a commercial diet (protein 36·54 %, fat 4·99 % dry weight and soyabean oil as a lipid source) for two weeks to acclimatise to the experimental condition.

Before the feeding experiment, fish were fasted for 24 h. A total of 216 fish (10·21 (sd 0·10) g body weight) were randomly distributed into twelve aquaria (0·73×0·46×0·60 m; 18 fish/aquarium). Each diet was randomly assigned into three aquaria. Fish were hand-fed to apparent satiation twice daily (at 09.00 and 16.00 hours) for 10 weeks. Satiation feeding was achieved by allowing fish to eat until feeding activity stopped, with no feed remaining in the aquaria. The feed intake was recorded. During the feeding experiment, water was circularly filtered and renewed by 1/5 daily to maintain acceptable water quality. Water temperature was controlled at 28°C. The dissolved O2 was approximately at saturation (9 mg/l) through continuous aeration. The photoperiod was 12 h light–12 h dark (from 08.00 to 20.00 hours). Dead fish were weighed and recorded.

Sampling procedure

After 10 weeks of feeding, the fish were fasted for 24 h. All of the fish were anaesthetised with tricaine methanesulfonate (MS222; 0·06 g/l). Fish were weighed and their body lengths were measured. Six fish per aquarium were randomly selected for blood collection from the caudal vein, and sampled blood was allowed to clot at 4°C for 6 h. Serum samples were collected after centrifugation of the clot for 10 min (825 g , 4°C), and then they were pooled two by two in each aquarium, frozen in liquid N2 and stored at −80°C until analysis. The remaining fish were killed and dissected. After weighing the total visceral weight, the hepatopancreas, intraperitoneal fat (IPF), kidney, spleen and intestine were stripped and weighed. Afterwards, samples of hepatopancreas and IPF from three fish/aquarium were stored at −20°C for fatty acid composition analyses; those from another six fish/aquarium were frozen in liquid N2 and then stored at −80°C for gene expression or enzyme activities measurements; and those from the other three fish/aquarium were fixed in paraformaldehyde solution for histology analysis. All experimental animal procedures were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee and performed in accordance with national and institutional regulations on the care and use of experimental animals.

Specific growth rate (SGR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), hepatopancreas index (HI), intraperitoneal fat index (IPFI), relative kidney weight (RKW), relative spleen weight (RSW), relative intestine weight (RIW), viscera index (VI), condition factor (CF) and survival rate (SR) were calculated using the following formulae:

$$\eqalignno{ &#x0026; {\rm SGR}\, {\equals}\, \left( {{\rm Ln}\,{\rm final}\,{\rm weight}-{\rm Ln}\,{\rm initial}\,{\rm weight}} \right)\, {\times}\, {{100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{100} {70{\rm d}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {70{\rm d}}} \cr &#x0026; {\rm FCR}\, {\equals}\, {{{\rm amount}\,{\rm of}\,{\rm feed}\,{\rm given}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm amount}\,{\rm of}\,{\rm feed}\,{\rm given}} {{\rm weight}\,{\rm gain}\,\left( {\rm g} \right)}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm weight}\,{\rm gain}\,\left( {\rm g} \right)}} \cr &#x0026; {\rm HI}\,\left( \,\&#x0025;\, \right)\, {\equals}\, {{{\rm hepatopancreas}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times} \,100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm hepatopancreas}\,{\rm weight}\,\, {\times}\, \,100} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}} \cr &#x0026; {\rm IPFI}\,\left( \,\&#x0025;\, \right){\rm }\, {\equals}\, {\rm }{{{\rm IPF}\,{\rm weight }\, {\times}\, 100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm IPF}\,{\rm weight }\, {\times}\, 100} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}} \cr &#x0026; {\rm RKW}\,\left( \,\&#x0025;\, \right)\, {\equals}\, {{{\rm kidney}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm kidney}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}} \cr &#x0026; {\rm RSW}\,\left( \,\&#x0025;\, \right){\rm }\, {\equals}\, {\rm }{{{\rm spleen}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm spleen}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}} \cr &#x0026; {\rm RIW}\,\left( \,\&#x0025;\, \right)\, {\equals}\, {{{\rm intestine}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm intestine}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}} \cr &#x0026; {\rm VI}\,\left( \,\&#x0025;\, \right)\, {\equals}\, {{{\rm viscera}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm viscera}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}}} \cr &#x0026; {\rm CF}\,\left( {{{\rm g} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\rm g} {{\rm cm}^{3} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm cm}^{3} }}} \right)\, {\equals}\, {{{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm body}\,{\rm weight}\, {\times}\, 100} {{\rm body}\,{\rm length}^{3} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm body}\,{\rm length}^{3} }} \cr &#x0026; {\rm SR}\,\left( \,\&#x0025;\, \right)\, {\equals}\, {{{\rm final}\,{\rm number}\,{\rm of}\,{\rm fish}\, {\times}\, 100} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\rm final}\,{\rm number}\,{\rm of}\,{\rm fish}\, {\times}\, 100} {{\rm initial}\,{\rm number}\,{\rm of}\,{\rm fish}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\rm initial}\,{\rm number}\,{\rm of}\,{\rm fish}}}. $$

Proximate composition analysis

The proximate compositions of the diets were determined according to the methods of Association of Official Analytical Chemists Procedures (1995)( 41 ). In brief, samples were dried to a constant weight to determine moisture at 105°C. Crude protein was determined by measuring N (N×6·25) of the samples using the Kjeldahl method. Crude lipid was measured by diethyl ether extraction using the Soxhlet method. Crude ash was determined by combustion at 550°C in a muffle furnace.

Fatty acid composition analysis

Lipid extraction of tissues (hepatopancreas and IPF; 3 individuals/aquarium) and diets was performed by using chloroform–methanol (2:1, v/v) based on the method of Folch et al. ( Reference Folch, Lees and Sloane Stanley 42 ). Extracts were dried under vacuum, and then the tissue lipids were dissolved in chloroform and separated into polar lipids (PL) and non-polar lipids (NPL) using Silica Cartridges according to the method of Juaneda & Rocquelin( Reference Juaneda and Rocquelin 43 ). A volume of 20 ml of chloroform was used to elute the NPL fraction and 30 ml of methanol was added to elute the PL fraction. Extracts were then dried under vacuum again. The preparation of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) was performed based on the method described previously( Reference Tian, Ji and Oku 4 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 39 ). In brief, 1 ml of hexane was added to dissolve the lipid fractions, and methyl esterification was performed for 1 h after adding 1 ml of potassium hydroxide methanol (0·4 m). Then, 2 ml of distilled water was added to separate the mixture into two layers. The upper layer was separated and used for GC analysis. The FAME were determined by an Agilent 7820a Series GC (Agilent Technologies) equipped with a flame ionisation detector and capillary column (HP-88, length 100 m, internal diameter 0·25 mm, film thickness 0·20 μm; Agilent Technologies). Individual methyl esters were identified through comparison with known standards (47015-U; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.). The results of identified fatty acids were presented as percentage of total fatty acids.

Antioxidant status and lysozyme activity

Serum SOD activity, CAT activity, GSH-Px activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content and the activity of lysozyme (LZM) were measured with the use of assay kits (Jiancheng Biotech Co.).

Histological processing and morphological evaluation

The samples of fixed hepatopancreas and IPF were washed in tap water for 12 h, followed by a routine dehydration in a graded series of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95 and 100 % twice). The samples were then equilibrated in xylene and embedded in paraffin based on the standard histological techniques, as described previously( Reference Liu, Ji and Li 44 ). Afterwards, sections were cut at 5 μm with the use of a rotary microtome (RM2235; Leica) and mounted in glass slides, which were then stained with haematoxylin–eosin. Histological samples were observed and photographed by using an upright microscopy (Leica Biosystems). The average adipocyte size per image was quantified using Photoshop (Adobe), as previously described by Osman et al. ( Reference Osman, Selway and Kępczyńska 45 ). An average value across five non-overlapping images (five/section) was calculated for each group.

NEFA and TAG assays

NEFA from serum and hepatopancreas and the TAG content from hepatopancreas were measured by using the NEFA assay kit or TAG assay kit (Jiancheng Biotech Co.). These two indexes were measured based on the user’s manual step by step. All assays were performed in triplicate in each aquarium.

Hepatopancreatic lipid metabolism enzyme activities

Lipid-metabolism-related enzymes, including the lipoprotein lipase (LPL), hepatic lipase (HL) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH), in the hepatopancreas were measured by using the assay kits (Jiancheng Biotech Co.) according to the method in the specification.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR

Hepatopancreas and IPF from three fish per aquarium were used for the detection of gene expression. RNA extraction, complementary DNA synthesis and gene expression measurements were performed as described previously( Reference Tian, Ji and Oku 4 ). The primer sequences for β-actin, LPL, fatty acid synthase (FAS), diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase (DGAT), apoE, PPARα, adipose TAG lipase (ATGL), PPARγ, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα), hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT-1) are listed in Table 3. After the PCR reaction, melting curves were analysed to confirm that single products were obtained in these reactions. A relative quantification method, the comparative CT method ( $$2^{{{\minus}\Delta \Delta C_{t} }} $$ ), was used to calculate the gene expression values, as described in the literature( Reference Livak and Schmittgen 46 , Reference Pfaffl 47 ).

Table 3 Primers used in real-time quantitative PCR

Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as means and standard deviations. Percentage data were arcsine-transformed before analysis. One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences among the experimental groups, followed by Duncan’s post hoc tests. All analyses, including the principle component analysis (PCA) of the fatty acids, were conducted using PASW Statistics 18 (SPSS). A significance level of P<0·05 was used for all tests.

Results

Growth performance and biological parameters

The growth of fish doubled compared with the initial weight (Table 4). Fish fed 0·30 % EPA exhibited significantly higher final weight and SGR in comparison with fish fed the control diet (P<0·05). HI in the ARA, EPA and ARA+EPA groups presented significantly lower values than those in the control group (P<0·05). The IPFI value was inhibited in the ARA group compared with the control (P<0·05). Interestingly, fish subjected to ARA+EPA had higher RSW than those subjected to control (P<0·05). No statistically significant difference was found in other indices such as FCR, RKW, RIW, VI, CF and SR (P>0·05).

Table 4 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the growth performance, feed utilisation, survival and biological parameters of juvenile grass carp (Mean values and standard deviations; n 3/group)

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Fatty acid composition

Lipids in the hepatopancreas and IPF were separated for NPL and PL fractions, and then fatty acid compositions were analysed (Tables 5 and 6). ARA and EPA presented higher levels in the PL (3·56–5·86 % for ARA; 0·40–1·46 % for EPA) than NPL (0·41–0·98 % for ARA; 0·25–0·50 % for EPA) of the hepatopancreas, whereas there was no apparent difference in the IPF (0·75–2·47 % in NPL and 0·63–1·61 % in PL for ARA; 0·47–1·30 % in NPL and 0·51–1·20 % in PL for EPA).

Table 5 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the fatty acid composition (percentage of total fatty acids) in the non-polar lipid (NPL) and polar lipid (PL) fraction of hepatopancreas in juvenile grass carp (Mean values and standard deviations; n 3/group)

a,b,c,d Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Table 6 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the fatty acid composition (percentage of total fatty acids) in the non-polar lipid (NPL) and polar lipid (PL) fraction of intraperitoneal fat in juvenile grass carp (Mean values and standard deviations; n 3/group)

a,b,c,d Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

To be detailed, in the hepatopancreas, the highest ARA contents were presented in fish fed ARA both in NPL and PL, followed by ARA+EPA (P<0·05). However, significantly different contents of EPA were only found in the PL, which showed significantly higher level in the EPA group, followed by the ARA+EPA group (P<0·05). Moreover, EPA feeding fish also showed increased 22 : 5n-3 content in the PL compared with the control (P<0·05). These resulted in the increase of the total n-3 PUFA. ARA:EPA ratio exhibited a similar trend with those in the diets (P<0·05) (Table 5).

In the IPF, dietary ARA significantly increased the ARA proportion both in NPL and PL (P<0·05); paralleled trends also applied to 22 : 4n-6 in the NPL and PL, and 18 : 3n-6 in the NPL (P<0·05). Similarly, EPA content increased in fish fed EPA and ARA+EPA in these two lipid fractions (P<0·05). Moreover, dietary EPA also significantly increased 18 : 3n-3 in the PL, 22 : 5n-3 in the NPL, as well as the DHA content both in the NPL and PL fractions (P<0·05). Interestingly, SFA proportion decreased and MUFA proportion increased in the PL of fish fed EPA (P<0·05) (Table 6).

The PCA demonstrated different patterns of fatty acid distribution in NPL and PL of these two tissues (Fig. 1). Overall, there exists more distinct difference of the fatty acid composition between these two fractions in the hepatopancreas than those in the adipose tissue. Specifically, in the first component of score plot (Fig. 1(a)), all the hepatopancreas-PL samples are located to the right of the diagram, whereas the adipose tissue NPL are located to the left. The corresponding component plot (Fig. 1(b)) suggests that SFA, ARA and DHA (on the right of the diagram) correspond to the hepatopancreas-PL samples, whereas MUFA and C18 PUFA (on the left right of the diagram), in particular, correspond to the adipose tissue NPL. Furthermore, the second component of the corresponding component plot (Fig. 1(b)) shows that MUFA is located on the negative axis of the second component plot and could correspond to the hepatopancreas NPL samples, whereas the other types of fatty acids could correspond to the adipose tissue PL. Besides, the component plot also demonstrates that adipose tissue is likely to deposit C18 PUFA.

Fig. 1 Score plot (a) and component plot (b) from principal component analysis on fatty acid composition of the non-polar lipid (NPL) and polar lipid (PL) of the hepatopancreas and intraperitoneal fat in juvenile grass carp fed different diets. a: , Control; , arachidonic acid (ARA); , EPA; , ARA+EPA.

Antioxidant responses and lysozyme activity in serum

Table 7 shows the status of antioxidant (SOD, CAT and GSH-Px activities and MDA contents) and LZM activity in serum of fish fed different diets. The serum SOD activities and CAT activities were significantly increased in fish fed ARA and EPA diets (P<0·05), whereas fish fed these LC-PUFA showed declined trend of serum GSH-Px activities (P<0·05). MDA contents also decreased in fish fed ARA, EPA and ARA+EPA, and significant differences are shown in EPA and ARA+EPA groups (P<0·05). As for the serum LZM activities, the treatment groups had higher levels than the control group; EPA and ARA+EPA reached significant levels (P<0·05).

Table 7 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the serum antioxidant responses and lysozyme activity in juvenile grass carp (Mean values and standard deviations; n 3/group)

a,b,c Mean values with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Lipid accumulation

Fig. 2 shows the phenotype of lipid accumulation of the fish fed various diets. Dietary ARA and EPA treatment groups showed decreased TAG content in the hepatopancreas (P<0·05) (Fig. 2(A) and (C)). On the other hand, in the IPF, adipocyte size in the ARA and ARA+EPA groups presented significantly lower values compared with that in the control (P<0·05) (Fig. 2(B) and (C)). Interestingly, LC-PUFA treatment groups showed higher serum NEFA levels, and ARA significantly increased the serum NEFA in comparison with the other groups (P<0·05).

Fig. 2 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the lipid accumulation in juvenile grass carp. (A) Histological morphology of the hepatopancreas; (B) histological morphology of intraperitoneal fat; (C) TAG content of hepatopancreas, adipocyte size, serum NEFA levels. Values are means (n 3), and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Lipid-metabolism-related enzyme activities in hepatopancreas

The LPL activity of the hepatopancreas was lower in fish fed ARA compared with fish fed control (P<0·05). However, both ARA and EPA groups presented significantly lower HL activities than the ARA+EPA group (P<0·05). MDH activities exhibited significantly higher levels in all the LC-PUFA treatment groups compared with those in the control group (P<0·05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the activities of lipid-metabolism-related enzymes in the hepatopancreas of juvenile grass carp. Values are means (n 3), and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. LPL, lipoprotein lipase; HL, hepatic lipase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Lipid-metabolism-related gene expression in hepatopancreas and intraperitoneal fat

For the hepatopancreas (Fig. 4), dietary ARA, EPA and combined ARA and EPA groups presented significantly lower mRNA expression of FAS, DGAT and apoE (P<0·05). Dietary ARA significantly increased the mRNA expression of ATGL (P<0·05), whereas this gene was decreased in fish subjected to EPA and ARA+EPA.

Fig. 4 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the lipid-metabolism-related gene expression of the hepatopancreas in juvenile grass carp. Values are means (n 3), and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. FAS, fatty acid synthase; DGAT, diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase; ATGL, adipose TAG lipase; CPT-1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

In the IPF (Fig. 5), ARA treatment significantly decreased C/EBPα and LPL, and dietary ARA and ARA+EPA decreased the expression of FAS (P<0·05). The PPARα and CPT-1 mRNA level significantly increased in the ARA group compared with the other groups (P<0·05); EPA and ARA+EPA groups also showed a significant increase in these gene levels compared with the controls, whereas they showed lower levels compared with the ARA group. Dietary ARA significantly increased the expression of ATGL and HSL (P<0·05), whereas these genes were not increased under EPA or ARA+EPA treatments.

Fig. 5 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the lipid-metabolism-related gene expression of intraperitoneal fat in juvenile grass carp. Values are means (n 3), and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. C/EBPα, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein α; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; fatty acid synthase; ATGL, adipose TAG lipase; HSL, hormone-sensitive lipase; CPT-1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Discussion

ARA and EPA exhibit a competitive relationship for binding to some enzymes in fish, such as the eicosanoid synthesis enzymes, phospholipid esterase or fatty acid elongase( Reference Tocher 6 , Reference Halver and Hardy 11 ). The inverse relationship between EPA and ARA has been reported in fish tissues. Some enzymes have preference for these two fatty acids. ARA is the preferred substrate for eicosanoids, whereas EPA is the preferred substrate for phosphoglycerides( Reference Tocher 6 , Reference Halver and Hardy 11 ). Moreover, the affinity of the elongase 2/5 is higher for EPA than for ARA( Reference Tocher 6 , Reference Halver and Hardy 11 , Reference Fountoulaki, Alexis and Nengas 14 , Reference Tocher 38 ). Hence, there must be a complex and competitive regulation of fish physiological processes by these two fatty acids. However, our early studies have suggested a similar function of ARA and n-3 LC-PUFA in the lipid accumulation, and the mechanism were also analogous( Reference Ji, Li and Liu 3 , Reference Tian, Ji and Oku 4 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 32 , Reference Liu, Li and Huang 34 , Reference Tian, Lu and Ji 36 ). Thus, in this study, we aimed to compare the effect of dietary ARA and EPA on the performance of grass carp in detail. Our data demonstrated that dietary ARA to some extent has a different role from EPA in controlling growth performance and lipid metabolism of grass carp.

In this study, dietary ARA had no significant effect on the growth performance of grass carp, similar to early studies( Reference Tian, Ji and Oku 4 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 33 ). However, a positive effect on the growth was found in fish fed 0·3 % EPA. The result that EPA promoted slightly higher growth than ARA has also been found in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)( Reference Norambuena, Morais and Emery 30 , Reference Norambuena, Rombenso and Turchini 31 ). Actually, moderate dietary n-3 LC-PUFA (approximately 0·3 % EPA and approximately 0·2 % DHA) has been reported to increase growth in juvenile grass carp, suggesting that EPA concentration at 0·3 % or a high ratio of n-3:n-6 LC-PUFA might benefit the growth of juvenile grass carp( Reference Ji, Li and Liu 3 ). The decreased HI in fish fed ARA, EPA or a combination of ARA and EPA was consistent with lipid accumulation in the hepatopancreas. These results highlighted the growth-promoting effects of dietary supplementation of EPA compared with ARA.

We also demonstrated different accumulation patterns of EPA and ARA in the hepatopancreas and IPF. As a prerequisite, given that the fatty acid compositions of hepatopancreas and IPF reflected those of the diets, dietary ARA and EPA were effectively incorporated into the fish lipid. In the hepatopancreas, ARA and EPA are more likely to retain in PL; in particular, ARA content was 7-fold higher in PL than that in NPL. A similar result was reported in the hepatopancreas, muscle and gill in gilthead bream (Sparusaurata L.)( Reference Fountoulaki, Alexis and Nengas 14 ). However, in IPF there was no apparent preference of these two fatty acids on NPL and PL, suggesting that adipose tissue might be an ‘inert organ’ that has lower ability for allotting ARA and EPA at a subcellular level. In the ARA+EPA group, EPA showed less levels than ARA did in tissues, although ARA and EPA were equally provided in the diet. This might be due to the conversion of EPA to DPA and DHA, as suggested by the higher content of these two derivatives in fish fed EPA. There was a slightly inverse relationship between ARA and EPA content in hepatopancreas, but no such phenomenon was found in IPF. This was not consistent with early studies, which have observed an apparent decrease in EPA with increased dietary ARA levels in gilthead bream and Atlantic salmon( Reference Fountoulaki, Alexis and Nengas 14 , Reference Bessonart, Izquierdo and Salhi 48 , Reference Bell, McVicar and Park 49 ), possibly because of the difference in fish species. It has been suggested that SFA and MUFA are preferentially located in the sn-1 and sn-3 position of the TAG and sn-1 in the phosphoglycerides, whereas PUFA are preferentially located in the sn-2 position( Reference Halver and Hardy 11 ). Roughly similarly, the fatty acid composition and PCA scores demonstrated that SFA and LC-PUFA are readily retained in PL, whereas MUFA is retained in NPL, suggesting that SFA have more affinity in PL and MUFA in NPL in grass carp. Besides, C18 PUFA presented higher content in IPF than in hepatopancreas. This might be because IPF is an ‘entrepot’ that accumulates dietary lipid for energy storage, whereas hepatopancreas is an important intermediary metabolism tissue that has higher capacity for fatty acid metabolism such as desaturation/elongation and β-oxidation( Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 39 , Reference Turchini, Torstensen and Ng 50 ).

Because of the high unsaturation, ARA and EPA are easy to be attacked by free radicals, which cause lipid peroxidation and impair the functional integrity of cell membranes and enzyme activity( Reference Gray 51 , Reference Halliwell and Gutteridge 52 ). MDA is the end product of lipid peroxidation and its content could reflect the degree of lipid peroxidation( Reference Surapaneni and Venkataramana 53 ). SOD is considered to play a pivotal antioxidant role and catalyses O2 to H2O2, and H2O2 can be removed by the activities of CAT or GSH-Px( Reference Tocher 6 ). It has been shown that moderate dietary ARA could increase the antioxidant response in fish such as Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus)( Reference Xu, Ai and Mai 19 ), Synechogobius hasta ( Reference Luo, Tan and Li 54 ) and Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica)( Reference Shahkar, Yun and Lee 21 ). Similar results have also been found in fish fed appropriate n-3 LC-PUFA( Reference Li, Liu and Ji 35 , Reference Zuo, Ai and Mai 55 ). However, high levels of dietary ARA or n-3 LC-PUFA were reported to cause severe oxidative stress( Reference Ji, Li and Liu 3 , Reference Xu, Ai and Mai 19 , Reference Luo, Tan and Li 54 , Reference Todorčević, Kjær and Djaković 56 ). In the present study, we have shown that dietary 0·3 % ARA and EPA decreased the serum MDA content, and increased the SOD and CAT activities, suggesting that these two fatty acids improved the antioxidant status at this concentration in diet of grass carp. Interestingly, GSH-Px activities were decreased in fish fed ARA and EPA, possibly because of an adaptive down-regulation of this enzyme resulting from lower free-radical levels. Our study also demonstrated that ARA and EPA increased the LZM activity, similar to the study in Japanese seabass( Reference Xu, Ai and Mai 19 ), Japanese eel( Reference Shahkar, Yun and Lee 21 ) and large yellow croaker (Larmichthyscrocea)( Reference Zuo, Ai and Mai 55 ). Overall, these results demonstrate that ARA and EPA exhibited analogous function in regard to the antioxidant and antibacterial response.

In early studies, it was observed that dietary ARA decrease the lipid accumulation in grass carp( Reference Tian, Ji and Oku 4 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 32 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 33 ) as in other fish species( Reference Fountoulaki, Alexis and Nengas 14 , Reference Xu, Ai and Mai 19 , Reference Luo, Tan and Li 54 ). On the other side, considerable studies have shown that n-3 LC-PUFA, including EPA, have the capacity to decrease lipid content in fish, including grass carp( Reference Ji, Li and Liu 3 , Reference Li, Liu and Ji 35 , Reference Tian, Lu and Ji 36 , Reference Todorčević and Hodson 57 ). In the present study, we have shown that 0·3 % ARA and EPA decreased the TAG level in the hepatopancreas, whereas a combination of ARA and EPA had no such function, which might be due to the low concentration or the competition for binding enzymes. However, in regard to the dietary n-6:n-3 LC-PUFA ratios, high (ARA group, 8·2) or low (EPA group, 0·10) ratios presented a positive relationship with the inhibition of lipid accumulation compared with the moderate ratios (control group, 0·88; ARA+EPA group, 1·09), indicating that an imbalance of n-6 and n-3 LC-PUFA might result in the decrease of lipid retention in hepatopancreas, but this needs further confirmation. Interestingly, regarding the adipose tissue, although ARA blocked the development of adipocyte as indicated by the IPFI and adipocyte sizes, EPA had no such efficacy, suggesting that dietary EPA had weaker ability in repressing adipogenesis than ARA in this study. Taken together, these results demonstrated that dietary ARA and EPA played similar roles in repressing lipid accumulation in the hepatopancreas but only ARA acted as the inhibitor of adipose tissue development. Consistent with the possible inhibitory effects on adipogenesis, ARA but not EPA increased the serum NEFA level, possibly because of the up-regulation of the lipolytic genes in adipose tissue( Reference Frühbeck, Méndez-Giménez and Fernández-Formoso 58 ).

LPL is considered as a key enzyme in the lipid accumulation and metabolism of many tissues, which participates in the removal of lipoprotein TAG from the circulation (mainly chylomicron and very LDL)( Reference Eckel 59 , Reference Nilsson-Ehle, Garfinkel and Schotz 60 ). A decrease in LPL activity or gene expression with increasing dietary ARA has been suggested in S. hasta and grass carp( Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 33 , Reference Luo, Tan and Li 54 ), which was also shown in this study. The low LPL activity was consistent with the low TAG level in hepatopancreas. EPA also inhibited this enzyme but to a lesser extent, and our early study has observed an increase in LPL activity in grass carp fed n-3 LC-PUFA. The effects of PUFA on LPL-mediated lipid metabolism might need further investigation( Reference Ji, Li and Liu 3 ). HL is primarily synthesised in liver and involved in chylomicron-remnant and HDL metabolism( Reference Connelly 61 ). It should be noted that the ARA+EPA group presented significantly higher HL activity, which might be because of the moderate ratio of n-6:n-3 LC-PUFA and may possibly be the reason for the relatively higher lipid accumulation in this group. MDH plays a key part in the malate/aspartate shuttle across the mitochondrial membrane and in the tricarboxylic acid cycle within the mitochondrial matrix( Reference Minarik, Tomaskova and Kollarova 62 ). In our study, dietary ARA, EPA and a combination of ARA and EPA increased the hepatopancreatic MDH activities, indicating that these C20 LC-PUFA could increase the active status of tricarboxylic acid cycle.

In this study, both ARA and EPA decreased the de novo lipogenesis capacity in a similar manner as suggested by the down-regulation of FAS and DGAT mRNAs in hepatopancreas, which is consistent with the low TAG levels. Many studies have demonstrated that ARA and n-3 LC-PUFA could decrease the lipogenic gene expression in grass carp( Reference Tian, Ji and Oku 4 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 33 , Reference Li, Liu and Ji 35 , Reference Tian, Lu and Ji 36 ). ApoE is mainly produced by the liver and combines with lipids in the body to form lipoproteins, acting as a key regulator of plasma lipid levels( Reference Phillips 63 ). Interestingly, all dietary LC-PUFA treatments resulted in the decrease of the expression of apoE in this study, suggesting a lower capacity of packaging lipoproteins in these groups. However, these gene expressions seem to have no relevance to the ratio of n-3:n-6 LC-PUFA, as proved in the ARA+EPA group. A clear difference between ARA and EPA was found in lipid catabolism, which is also an important factor influencing lipid accumulation. Only dietary ARA increased the expression of ATGL that catalyses the first step for the sequential hydrolysis of TAG( Reference Sun, Ji and Li 64 ). There is one previous study showing similar results( Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 33 ). Considering that the hepatopancreatic TAG contents were similar in the ARA and EPA groups, lipid anabolism would play the primary role in controlling TAG level in hepatopancreas. Alternatively, compared with EPA, dietary ARA may decrease lipid incorporation and enhance mobilisation in the hepatopancreas (as suggested by LPL activity and ATGL mRNA levels), resulting in the apparently similar TAG levels.

ARA decreased the expression of the adipogenic marker genes C/EBPα, LPL and FAS, and increased lipid catabolic mRNA levels of PPARα, ATGL, HSL and CPT-1 in IPF. The EPA group showed less effects on these genes, although it has been suggested that EPA also could trigger the inhibition of adipogenesis and promotion of lipolysis( Reference Liu, Li and Huang 34 , Reference Li, Liu and Ji 35 , Reference Todorčević and Hodson 57 ). The increased serum NEFA levels in fish fed ARA but not EPA also demonstrated the higher lipolysis-enhancing effect of ARA compared with EPA. In the present study, EPA level in the IPF was less than that in ARA, partly because of the conversion to DPA or DHA. The low EPA concentration might account for its low influence on lipid metabolism genes. In another study, we observed that EPA content at 0·6 % could effectively inhibit lipogenic and increase lipolytic genes (unpublished results). Moreover, it has been suggested that the metabolites of ARA from the COX pathway might be responsible for the improvement of lipid catabolic capacity in grass carp( Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 32 , Reference Tian, Lei and Ji 33 ). The EPA-derived COX eicosanoids are less active possibly because of the lower level of substrate( Reference Tocher 6 , Reference Halver and Hardy 11 ). It is difficult in in vivo studies to exactly match intracellular levels of the target fatty acids. Detailed mechanisms underlying the difference between ARA and EPA will be addressed in further in vitro studies using model systems.

In conclusion, the present result showed that diet supplemented with EPA was beneficial on the growth performance, whereas ARA exhibited more potent ability in controlling lipid metabolism in IPF. These fatty acids showed similar effects on lipid metabolism in the hepatopancreas. ARA and EPA are more likely to be esterified in PL in the hepatopancreas than in IPF, and presented similar effects on the antioxidant capacity.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ankang Fisheries Experimental and Demonstration Station of the Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University for the experimental fish.

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos 31372538, K3050215105) and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (grant no. CARS-46-16). The funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of the article.

J.-j. T., H. J. and J. X. conceived and designed the experiments. J.-j. T. and C.-x. L. performed the experiments and contributed to the analysis of data. J.-j. T. and G. K. co-wrote the manuscript. C.-x. L., H. J., J.-s. Z., H.b. Y., Y. L. and E.-m. Y. contributed to the revision.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Higgs, D & Dong, F (2000) Lipids and fatty acids. In Encyclopedia of Aquaculture, pp. 476496 [RR Stickney, editor]. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
2. Kiron, V, Thawonsuwan, J, Panigrahi, A, et al. (2011) Antioxidant and immune defences of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) offered plant oils differing in fatty acid profiles from early stages. Aquacult Nutr 17, 130140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Ji, H, Li, J & Liu, P (2011) Regulation of growth performance and lipid metabolism by dietary n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids in juvenile grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idellus . Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 159, 4956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Tian, J, Ji, H, Oku, H, et al. (2014) Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) on lipid metabolism and health status of juvenile grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idellus . Aquaculture 430, 5765.Google Scholar
5. Bell, JG & Sargent, JR (2003) Arachidonic acid in aquaculture feeds: current status and future opportunities. Aquaculture 218, 491499.Google Scholar
6. Tocher, DR (2003) Metabolism and functions of lipids and fatty acids in teleost fish. Rev Fish Sci 11, 107184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Yin, H, Zhou, Y, Zhu, M, et al. (2013) Role of mitochondria in programmed cell death mediated by arachidonic acid-derived eicosanoids. Mitochondrion 13, 209224.Google Scholar
8. Funk, CD (2001) Prostaglandins and leukotrienes: advances in eicosanoid biology. Science 294, 18711875.Google Scholar
9. Wang, D & DuBois, RN (2010) Eicosanoids and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 10, 181193.Google Scholar
10. Hamre, K, Moren, M, Solbakken, J, et al. (2005) The impact of nutrition on metamorphosis in Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.). Aquaculture 250, 555565.Google Scholar
11. Halver, JE & Hardy, RW (2002) Fish Nutrition, 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
12. Moreno, JJ (2009) Differential effects of arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acid-derived eicosanoids on polymorphonuclear transmigration across endothelial cell cultures. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 331, 11111117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Rodríguez-Lagunas, MJ, Ferrer, R & Moreno, JJ (2013) Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid-derived prostaglandin E3 on intestinal epithelial barrier function. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 88, 339345.Google Scholar
14. Fountoulaki, E, Alexis, M, Nengas, I, et al. (2003 ) Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (20:4n-6), on growth, body composition, and tissue fatty acid profile of gilthead bream fingerlings (Sparus aurata L.). Aquaculture 225, 309323.Google Scholar
15. Atalah, E, Hernández-Cruz, CM, Ganuza, E, et al. (2011) Importance of dietary arachidonic acid for the growth, survival and stress resistance of larval European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed high dietary docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids. Aquacult Res 42, 12611268.Google Scholar
16. Carrier, JK III, Watanabe, WO, Harel, M, et al. (2011) Effects of dietary arachidonic acid on larval performance, fatty acid profiles, stress resistance, and expression of Na+/K+ ATPase mRNA in black sea bass Centropristis striata . Aquaculture 319, 111121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Rezek, TC, Watanabe, WO, Harel, M, et al. (2010) Effects of dietary docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) and arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) on the growth, survival, stress resistance and fatty acid composition in black sea bass Centropristis striata (Linnaeus 1758) larvae. Aquacult Res 41, 13021314.Google Scholar
18. Montero, D, Terova, G, Rimoldi, S, et al. (2015) Modulation of the expression of components of the stress response by dietary arachidonic acid in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae. Lipids 50, 10291041.Google Scholar
19. Xu, H, Ai, Q, Mai, K, et al. (2010) Effects of dietary arachidonic acid on growth performance, survival, immune response and tissue fatty acid composition of juvenile Japanese seabass, Lateolabrax japonicus. Aquaculture 307, 7582.Google Scholar
20. Furne, M, Holen, E, Araujo, P, et al. (2013) Cytokine gene expression and prostaglandin production in head kidney leukocytes isolated from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) added different levels of arachidonic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid. Fish Shellfish Immunol 34, 770777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Shahkar, E, Yun, H, Lee, S, et al. (2016) Evaluation of the optimum dietary arachidonic acid level and its essentiality based on growth and non-specific immune responses in Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica . Aquaculture 452, 209216.Google Scholar
22. Norambuena, F, Estévez, A, Mañanós, E, et al. (2013) Effects of graded levels of arachidonic acid on the reproductive physiology of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis): fatty acid composition, prostaglandins and steroid levels in the blood of broodstock bred in captivity. Gen Comp Endocrinol 191, 92101.Google Scholar
23. Norambuena, F, Morais, S, Estévez, A, et al. (2013) Dietary modulation of arachidonic acid metabolism in senegalese sole (Solea Senegalensis) broodstock reared in captivity. Aquaculture 372, 8088.Google Scholar
24. Xu, H, Cao, L, Zhang, Y, et al. (2017) Dietary arachidonic acid differentially regulates the gonadal steroidogenesis in the marine teleost, tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis), depending on fish gender and maturation stage. Aquaculture 468, 378385.Google Scholar
25. Villalta, M, Estévez, A & Bransden, MP (2005) Arachidonic acid enriched live prey induces albinism in Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis) larvae. Aquaculture 245, 193209.Google Scholar
26. Boglino, A, Wishkerman, A, Darias, MJ, et al. (2014) Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) metamorphic larvae are more sensitive to pseudo-albinism induced by high dietary arachidonic acid levels than post-metamorphic larvae. Aquaculture 433, 276287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Wishkerman, A, Boglino, A, Darias, M J, et al. (2016) Image analysis-based classification of pigmentation patterns in fish: a case study of pseudo-albinism in Senegalese sole. Aquaculture 464, 303308.Google Scholar
28. Lie, KK, Kvalheim, K, Rasinger, JD, et al. (2016) Vitamin A and arachidonic acid altered the skeletal mineralization in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) larvae without any interactions on the transcriptional level. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 191, 8088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Boglino, A, Darias, MJ, Estévez, A, et al. (2012) The effect of dietary arachidonic acid during the Artemia feeding period on larval growth and skeletogenesis in Senegalese sole, Solea senegalensis. J Appl Ichthyol 28, 411418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Norambuena, F, Morais, S, Emery, JA, et al. (2015) Arachidonic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid metabolism in juvenile Atlantic salmon as affected by water temperature. PLOS ONE 10, e0143622.Google Scholar
31. Norambuena, F, Rombenso, A & Turchini, GM (2016) Towards the optimization of performance of Atlantic salmon reared at different water temperatures via the manipulation of dietary ARA/EPA ratio. Aquaculture 450, 4857.Google Scholar
32. Tian, JJ, Lei, CX, Ji, H, et al. (2016) Dietary arachidonic acid has a time-dependent differential impact on adipogenesis modulated via COX and LOX pathways in Grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idellus . Lipids 51, 13251338.Google Scholar
33. Tian, JJ, Lei, CX, Ji, H, et al. (2017) Role of cyclooxygenase-mediated metabolites in lipid metabolism and expression of some immune-related genes in juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) fed arachidonic acid. Fish Physiol Biochem 43, 703717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Liu, P, Li, C, Huang, J, et al. (2014) Regulation of adipocytes lipolysis by n-3 HUFA in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) in vitro and in vivo . Fish Physiol Biochem 40, 14471460.Google Scholar
35. Li, C, Liu, P, Ji, H, et al. (2015) Dietary n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids affect the biological and serum biochemical parameters, tissue fatty acid profile, antioxidation status and expression of lipid-metabolism-related genes in grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idellus . Aquacult Nutr 21, 373383.Google Scholar
36. Tian, JJ, Lu, RH, Ji, H, et al. (2015) Comparative analysis of the hepatopancreas transcriptome of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) fed with lard oil and fish oil diets. Gene 565, 192200.Google Scholar
37. Glencross, BD (2009) Exploring the nutritional demand for essential fatty acids by aquaculture species. Rev Aquacult 1, 71124.Google Scholar
38. Tocher, DR (2010) Fatty acid requirements in ontogeny of marine and freshwater fish. Aquacult Res 41, 717732.Google Scholar
39. Tian, JJ, Lei, CX & Ji, H (2016) Influence of dietary linoleic acid (18:2n-6) and α-linolenic acid (18:3n-3) ratio on fatty acid composition of different tissues in freshwater fish Songpu mirror carp, Cyprinus carpio . Aquacult Res 47, 38113825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Lavell, R (1989) Nutrition and Feeding of Fish. New York: Auburn University.Google Scholar
41. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1995) Official Methods of Analysis of Official Analytical Chemists International , 16th ed. Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical.Google Scholar
42. Folch, J, Lees, M & Sloane Stanley, G (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226, 497509.Google Scholar
43. Juaneda, P & Rocquelin, G (1985) Rapid and convenient separation of phospholipids and non phosphorus lipids from rat heart using silica cartridges. Lipids 20, 4041.Google Scholar
44. Liu, P, Ji, H, Li, C, et al. (2015) Ontogenetic development of adipose tissue in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Fish Phys Biochem 41, 867878.Google Scholar
45. Osman, OS, Selway, JL, Kępczyńska, MA, et al. (2013) A novel automated image analysis method for accurate adipocyte quantification. Adipocyte 2, 160164.Google Scholar
46. Livak, KJ & Schmittgen, TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402408.Google Scholar
47. Pfaffl, MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29, e45e45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Bessonart, M, Izquierdo, MS, Salhi, M, et al. (1999) Effect of dietary arachidonic acid levels on growth and survival of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae. Aquaculture 179, 265275.Google Scholar
49. Bell, JG, McVicar, AH, Park, MT, et al. (1991) High dietary linoleic acid affects the fatty acid compositions of individual phospholipids from tissues of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): association with stress susceptibility and cardiac lesion. J Nutr 121, 11631172.Google Scholar
50. Turchini, GM, Torstensen, BE & Ng, WK (2009) Fish oil replacement in finfish nutrition. Rev Aquacult 1, 1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Gray, JI (1978) Measurement of lipid oxidation: a review. J Am Oil Chem Soc 55, 539546.Google Scholar
52. Halliwell, B & Gutteridge, JM (2015) Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
53. Surapaneni, K & Venkataramana, G (2007) Status of lipid peroxidation, glutathione, ascorbic acid, vitamin E and antioxidant enzymes in patients with osteoarthritis. Indian J Med Sci 61, 914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Luo, Z, Tan, XY, Li, XD, et al. (2012) Effect of dietary arachidonic acid levels on growth performance, hepatic fatty acid profile, intermediary metabolism and antioxidant responses for juvenile Synechogobius hasta . Aquacult Nutr 18, 340348.Google Scholar
55. Zuo, R, Ai, Q, Mai, K, et al. (2012) Effects of dietary n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids on growth, nonspecific immunity, expression of some immune related genes and disease resistance of large yellow croaker (Larmichthys crocea) following natural infestation of parasites (Cryptocaryon irritans). Fish Shellfish Immunol 32, 249258.Google Scholar
56. Todorčević, M, Kjær, MA, Djaković, N, et al. (2009) n-3 HUFAs affect fat deposition, susceptibility to oxidative stress, and apoptosis in Atlantic salmon visceral adipose tissue. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 152, 135143.Google Scholar
57. Todorčević, M & Hodson, L (2015) The effect of marine derived n-3 fatty acids on adipose tissue metabolism and function. J Clin Med 5, 3.Google Scholar
58. Frühbeck, G, Méndez-Giménez, L, Fernández-Formoso, JA, et al. (2014) Regulation of adipocyte lipolysis. Nutr Res Rev 27, 6393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Eckel, RH (1989) Lipoprotein lipase. New Engl J Med 320, 10601068.Google ScholarPubMed
60. Nilsson-Ehle, P, Garfinkel, AS & Schotz, MC (1980) Lipolytic enzymes and plasma lipoprotein metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 49, 667693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Connelly, PW (1999) The role of hepatic lipase in lipoprotein metabolism. Clin Chim Acta 286, 243255.Google Scholar
62. Minarik, P, Tomaskova, N, Kollarova, M, et al. (2002) Malate dehydrogenases-structure and function. Gen Physiol Biophys 21, 257266.Google Scholar
63. Phillips, MC (2014) Apolipoprotein E isoforms and lipoprotein metabolism. IUBMB Life 66, 616623.Google Scholar
64. Sun, J, Ji, H, Li, XX, et al. (2016) Lipolytic enzymes involving lipolysis in teleost: synteny, structure, tissue distribution, and expression in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 198, 110118.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Formulation and chemical composition of the experimental diets (g/kg DM)

Figure 1

Table 2 Fatty acid composition of the experimental diets (percentage of total fatty acids)

Figure 2

Table 3 Primers used in real-time quantitative PCR

Figure 3

Table 4 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the growth performance, feed utilisation, survival and biological parameters of juvenile grass carp (Mean values and standard deviations; n 3/group)

Figure 4

Table 5 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the fatty acid composition (percentage of total fatty acids) in the non-polar lipid (NPL) and polar lipid (PL) fraction of hepatopancreas in juvenile grass carp (Mean values and standard deviations; n 3/group)

Figure 5

Table 6 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the fatty acid composition (percentage of total fatty acids) in the non-polar lipid (NPL) and polar lipid (PL) fraction of intraperitoneal fat in juvenile grass carp (Mean values and standard deviations; n 3/group)

Figure 6

Fig. 1 Score plot (a) and component plot (b) from principal component analysis on fatty acid composition of the non-polar lipid (NPL) and polar lipid (PL) of the hepatopancreas and intraperitoneal fat in juvenile grass carp fed different diets. a: , Control; , arachidonic acid (ARA); , EPA; , ARA+EPA.

Figure 7

Table 7 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the serum antioxidant responses and lysozyme activity in juvenile grass carp (Mean values and standard deviations; n 3/group)

Figure 8

Fig. 2 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the lipid accumulation in juvenile grass carp. (A) Histological morphology of the hepatopancreas; (B) histological morphology of intraperitoneal fat; (C) TAG content of hepatopancreas, adipocyte size, serum NEFA levels. Values are means (n 3), and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Figure 9

Fig. 3 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the activities of lipid-metabolism-related enzymes in the hepatopancreas of juvenile grass carp. Values are means (n 3), and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. LPL, lipoprotein lipase; HL, hepatic lipase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Figure 10

Fig. 4 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the lipid-metabolism-related gene expression of the hepatopancreas in juvenile grass carp. Values are means (n 3), and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. FAS, fatty acid synthase; DGAT, diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase; ATGL, adipose TAG lipase; CPT-1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Figure 11

Fig. 5 Effects of dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) and EPA on the lipid-metabolism-related gene expression of intraperitoneal fat in juvenile grass carp. Values are means (n 3), and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. C/EBPα, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein α; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; fatty acid synthase; ATGL, adipose TAG lipase; HSL, hormone-sensitive lipase; CPT-1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).