Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
EnglishFrançais
British Journal of Nutrition British Journal of Nutrition

Article contents

The availability to pigs of nicotinic acid in tortilla baked from maize treated with lime-water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

E. Kodicek ,
R. Braude ,
S. K. Kon  and
K. G. Mitchell
E. Kodicek
Affiliation:
Dunn Nutritional Labaratory, University of Cambridge and Medical Research Council
R. Braude
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
S. K. Kon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
K. G. Mitchell
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Save pdf (1 mb)
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. To view the full text please use the links above to select your preferred format.
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1959 , pp. 363 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1959

References

Adamstone, F. B., Krider, J. L. & James, M. F. (1949). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 52, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. K., Calvo, J., Robinson, W. D., Serrano, G. & Payne, G. C. (1948). Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 38, 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, D. A., Harper, A. E. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1955). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 57, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, R. J. (1945). Advanc. Protein Chem. 2, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R. (1954). In Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals, Vol. 1, p. 40. [J., Hammond, editor.] London: Butterworth Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Bressani, R., Paz y Paz, R. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1958). J. agric. Fd Chem. 6, 770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressani, R. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1958). J. agric. Fd Chem. 6, 774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressani, R., Scrimshaw, N. S., Béhar, M. & Viteri, F. (1958). J. Nutr. 66, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J., Kodicek, E. & Wilson, P. (1960). Brit. J. Nutr. 14. (In the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H. R., Ford, J. E., Kon, S. K., Thompson, S. Y., Rowland, S. J., Crossley, E. L. & Rothwell, J. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, D. K. & Kodicek, E. (1950). Biochem. J. 47, xxxiv.Google Scholar
Clegg, K. M., Kodicek, E. & Mistry, S. P. (1952). Biochem. J. 50, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Ford, J. E., Harrison, G. F., Kon, S. K., Shepheard, E. E. & Wilby, F. W. (1952). Brit. J. Nutr. 6, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravioto, O. Y., Figueroa, F. de M., Cravioto, R. O. & Massieu, G. H. (1952). Ciencia, Méx., 12, 19.Google Scholar
Cravioto, R. O., Anderson, R. K., Lockhart, E. E., Miranda, F. de P. & Harris, R. S. (1945). Science, 102, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravioto, R. O., Massieu, G. H., Cravioto, O. Y. & Figueroa, F. de M. (1952). J. Nutr. 48, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, M., Gaddi, A. M. & Bonomolo, A. (1956). Boll. Soc. ital. Biol. sper. 32, 793.Google Scholar
Firth, J. & Johnson, B. C. (1956). J. Nutr. 59, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, R. M. & Draper, H. H. (1958). J. Nutr. 65, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garton, G. A., Duncan, W. R. H., Madsen, K. A., Shanks, P. L. & Beattie, I. S. (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, G. A. (1956). J. Amer. diet. Ass. 32, 312.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, G. A., Gibbens, J., Unglaub, W. G. & Miller, O. N. (1956). Amer. J. clin. Nutr. 4, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, C. E., Smith, E. P., Hier, S. W. & Klein, D. (1947). J. biol. Chem. 168, 711.Google Scholar
Green, J., Marcinkiewicz, S. & Watt, P. R. (1955). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 6, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, M. E. (1954). Brit. J. Nutr. 8, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. E., Punekar, B. D. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1958). J. Nutr. 66, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. J. & Wang, Y. L. (1941). Biochem. J. 35, 1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathcote, J. G., Hinton, J. J. C. & Shaw, B. (1952). Proc. roy. Soc., B x139, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuser, G. F. & Scott, M. L. (1953). Poult. Sci. 32, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kligler, D. & Krehl, W. A. (1950). J. Nutr. 41, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodicek, E. (1940 a). Biochem. J. 34, 712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodicek, E. (1940 b). Biochem. J. 34, 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodicek, E. (1942). Biochemical studies on nicotinic acid. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kodicek, E. (1951 a). Rep. Progr. Chem. 48, 276.Google Scholar
Kodicek, E. (1951 b). Biochem. J. 48, viii.Google Scholar
Kodicek, E., Braude, R., Kon, S. K. & Mitchell, K. G. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodicek, E. & Pepper, C. R. (1948). J. gen. Microbiol. 2, 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodicek, E. & Wang, Y. L. (1949). Biochem. J. 44, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodicek, E. & Wilson, P. W. (1959). Brit. J. Nutr. 13. (In the Press).Google Scholar
Krehl, W. A., Elvehjem, C. A. & Strong, F. M. (1944). J. biol. Chem. 156, 13.Google Scholar
Krehl, W. A., Henderson, L. M., de la Huerga, J. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1946). J. biol. Chem. 166, 531.Google Scholar
Krehl, W. A. & Strong, F. M. (1944). J. biol. Chem. 156, 1.Google Scholar
Laguna, J. & Carpenter, K. J. (1951). J. Nutr. 45, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, E. G. & Hundley, J. M. (1958). Fed. Proc. 17, 484.Google Scholar
Mangay, A. S., Pearson, W. N. & Darby, W. J. (1957). J. Nutr. 62, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massieu, G. H., Cravioto, O. Y., Cravioto, R. O., Guzmán, J. & Suarez Soto, G. Y. M. de L. (1956). Ciencia, Méx., 16, 24.Google Scholar
Massieu, G. H., Guzmán, J., Cravioto, R. O. & Calvo, J. (1949). J. Nutr. 38, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, R. J. & Teter, W. S. (1956). J. Nutr. 60, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T., Sharman, I. M. & Ward, R. J. (1959). Brit. J. Nutr. 13, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilands, J. B. & Strong, F. M. (1948). Arch. Biochem. 19, 287.Google Scholar
Obel, A. -L. (1953). Acta path. microbiol. scand. Suppl. 94.Google Scholar
Paz y Paz, R. (1953). Esc. farm., Guatemala, 14, 2.Google Scholar
Pearson, W. N., Stempfel, S. J., Valenzueal, J. S., Utley, M. H. & Darby, W. J. (1957). J. Nutr. 62, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, W. N., Valenzuela, J. S. & van Eys, J. (1958). J. Nutr. 66, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellett, P. L. & Platt, B. S. (1956). Nature, Lond., 177, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaife, M. L. & Harris, P. L. (1944). J. biol. Chem. 156, 499.Google Scholar
Sarett, H. P. & Cheldelin, V. H. (1944). J. biol. Chem. 155, 153.Google Scholar
Sauberlich, H. E. & Baumann, C. A. (1948). J. biol. Chem. 176, 165.Google Scholar
Scrimshaw, N. S., Bressani, R., Béhar, M. & Viteri, F. (1958). J. Nutr. 66, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeggs, H. R., Nepple, H. M., Valentik, K. A., Huff, J. W. & Wright, L. D. (1950). J. biol. Chem. 184, 211.Google Scholar
Squibb, R. L., Braham, J. E., Arroyave, G. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1955). Fed. Proc. 14, 32.Google Scholar
Squibb, R. L., Braham, J. E., Arroyave, G. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1959). J. Nutr. 67, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, A., Harper, A. E. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 177, 117.Google Scholar
Teply, L. J. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 157, 303.Google Scholar
Vivian, V. M., Chaloupka, M. M. & Reynolds, M. S. (1958). J. Nutr. 66, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. L. & Kodicek, E. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanntorp, H. & Obel, A. -L. (1957). Acta chem. scand. 11, 1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, R. J. (1958). Some aspects of the estimation, biological potency and antioxidant activity of the tocopherols. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woolley, D. W. (1946). J. biol. Chem. 163, 773.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 174 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access
28 Cited by
Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-tmbpq Total loading time: 0.733 Render date: 2021-01-20T17:55:26.936Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The availability to pigs of nicotinic acid in tortilla baked from maize treated with lime-water
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The availability to pigs of nicotinic acid in tortilla baked from maize treated with lime-water
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The availability to pigs of nicotinic acid in tortilla baked from maize treated with lime-water
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *