Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T02:35:44.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anthropometric measurements and amounts of body fat and serum cholesterol in samples of three Nigerian populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

R. S. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
K. M. Etta
Affiliation:
Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Skinfold thicknesses, arm circumferences, heights, weights and serum cholesterol levels were determined in ninety-one university students, 207 soldiers and 102 out-patients, all male subjects. Some of these measurements were used to determine the amount of body fat, Quetelet's index and mid-arm muscle circumference

2. Quetelet's indices and body-fat values obtained were similar to previously reported values for lean or moderately built males

3. Serum cholesterol levels were generally low, with means ranging from 3·98 mmol/1 for 18- to 29-year-old students to 5·19 mmol/l for 40- to 69-year-old out-patients

4. The mean values for triceps skinfold thickness, the amount of body fat and serum cholesterol levels for healthy adults obtained in this study are probably normal for northern Nigerian populations

5. There was a significant correlation between the amount of body fat and values for triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses, Quetelet's index and body-weight for all adults. The correlation between muscle circumference and the amount of body fat was significant for all subjects except adult soldiers.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1975

References

Abell, L. L., Levy, B. B., Brodie, B. B. & Kendell, F. E. (1952). J. biol. Chem. 195, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrink, J. A. & Meigs, J. W. (1971). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 24, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brozek, J. & Keys, E. (1951). Br. J. Nutr. 5, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A & Rahaman, M. M. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A & Taylor, A. (1960). J. appl. Physiol. 15, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edozien, J. C. (1958). W. Afr. J. Med. 8, 121.Google Scholar
Eksmyr, R. & Engsner, G. (1971). Envir. Child Hlth 17, 110.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. F. (1962). Clin. Sci. 22, 333.Google Scholar
Falkner, F. (1960). Modern Problems in Pediatrics p. 439. Basle and New York: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Garn, S. M., Rosen, N. N. & McCann, M. B. (1971). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 24, 1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, E. E. & Heald, F. P. (1963). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 110, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelliffe, D. B. (1966). The Assessment of the Nutritional Status of the Community pp. 217, 218, 242. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, D. C., Spenser, S. S. & White, P. D. (1962). Am. J. Cardiol. 10, 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoye, H. J., Epstein, F. H. & Kjelsberg, M. O. (1966). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 18, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parizkova, J. (1961). Metabolism 10, 794.Google Scholar
Pascale, L. R., Grossman, M. I., Sloane, H. S. & Frankel, T. (1956). Hum. Biol. 28, 165.Google Scholar
Rathbun, E. N. & Pace, N. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 158, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, J. R. K. (1964). J. trop. Med. Hyg. 67, 209.Google Scholar
Scott, R. F., Daodu, A. S., Florentine, R. A., Davies, J. N. P. & Coles, R. M. (1961). Am. J. Cardiol. 8, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaper, A. G., Williams, A. W. & Spencer, P. (1961). E. Afr. med. J. 38, 569.Google Scholar
Siri, W. E. (1956). In Advances in Biological and Medical Physics p. 90 [Lawrence, J. H and Tobias, C. A., editors]. London and New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Steinkamp, R. C., Cohen, N. L., Gaffey, W. R., McKay, T., Bron, G., Siri, W. E., Sargent, T. W. & Isaacs, E. (1965). J. chron. Dis. 18, 1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, J. P., Wainright, J. & McGill, M. C. (1959). Circulation 20, 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, J. M. (1951). J. Physiol., Lond. 115, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. O. (1971). Br. Heart J. 33, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar