Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:53:28.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of the nutritive value of a maize-soya mixture, ‘Soy-Ogi’, as a weaning food in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2009

I. A. Akinrele  and
Charity C. A. Edwards
I. A. Akinrele
Affiliation:
Federal Institute of Industrial Research, P. M. B. 1023, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
Charity C. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
Federal Institute of Industrial Research, P. M. B. 1023, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Sour maize pap fortified with soya (Soy-Ogi), developed at the Federal Institute of Industrial Research, Oshodi, Nigeria has been evaluated chemically for its nutrient composition, biologically for protein quality and toxicity, and therapeutically on patients with kwashiorkor.

2. The indications are that it is a complete protein food suitable for feeding to children after weaning, and it compares favourably and economically with milk foods.

3. It was successfully used to restore normal health to children suffering from kwashiorkor.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , September 1971 , pp. 177 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

REFERENCES

Akinrele, I. A. (1966). A biochemical study of the traditional method of preparation of Ogi and its effects on the nutritive value of corn. PhD Thesis, University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Akinrele, I. A., Adeyinka, O., Edwards, C. C. A., Olatunji, F. O., Dina, J. A. & Koleoso, O. A. (1970). The Development and Production of Soy-Ogi. F. I. I. R. Research Report no. 42. Lagos, Nigeria: Federal Ministry of Industries.Google Scholar
Arroyave, G., Wilson, D., Béhar, M. & Viteri, F. (1961). Publs natn. Res. Coun., Wash. no. 843.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis 10th ed.Washington, D. C.: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Brock, J. F. (1961). Proc. int. Congr. Nutr. v. Washington Vol. 20, p. 61.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. (1960). Biochem. J. 77, 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, R. E., Beckman, R. M. & Birdsall, J. J. (1968). J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 51, 1003.Google Scholar
Collis, W. R. F., Dema, J. & Omololu, A. (1962). Trop. geogr. Med. 14, 140.Google Scholar
Dean, R. F. A. (1952). Br. med. J. ii, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (1957). F. A. O. nutr. Stud. no. 16.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L. & Summerson, W. H. (1954 a). Practical Physiological Chemistry 13th ed., p. 602. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L. & Summerson, W. H. (1954 b). Practical Physiological Chemistry 13th ed., p. 1375. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Payne, P. R. (1959). Br. J. Nutr. 13, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1967). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 18, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1924). J. biol. Chem. 58, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 238, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, C. D. (1958). W. Afr. med. J. 7, 34.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1962). Publs natn. Res. Coun., Wash. no. 990.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. B., Mendel, L. B. & Ferry, E. L. (1919). J. biol. Chem. 37, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellett, P. L., Kantarjian, A. & Jamalian, J. (1969). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 20, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, B. S., Miller, D. S. & Payne, P. R. (1961). In Recent Advances in Human Nutrition p. 351 [Brock, J. F., editor]. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Williams, C. D. (1933). Archs Dis. Childh. 8, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (1965). Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 301.Google Scholar