Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T08:40:50.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Experiences, Attitudes and Expectations of Music Students from a Feminist Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Sarah Maidlow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Attempting to explain the mis-match between women's low profile in most music professions and females' success in formal music education, I looked for differences in the attitudes, experiences and expectations of music students. This was done by using repertory grids with relatively small numbers of A-level and undergraduate music students, and postgraduate student teachers with music degrees. Constructivist psychology, of which repertory grid technique is a practical example, offers approaches in harmony with feminist preferences for the meaning people attach to their situation and the usefulness of their interpretation over notions of truth. Thus participants' responses dictate any groupings to emanate from analysis, rather than their being placed in pre-determined categories.

The outcomes of the study suggested, however, that little differentiates female and male musicians, as represented by these music students. Conversely, the results implied that the sexes are inclined to think similarly, insofar as likenesses in their attitudes could be associated with their instrument, and, crucially, that each sex tended to look to mo dels I mentors who reflected their sex as well as instrument. The sexes' inconsistency of achievement might then be explained by differences between sex-role models.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 37 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeles, H. and Porter, S. (1978). The sex-stereotyping of musical instruments. Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. and Fransella, F. (1986). Inquiring Man: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. 3rd edition. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Boulton, M. and O'Neill, S. (1994). Being Liked, bullied or ignored by one's peers: children's perceptions of the social consequences of playing most and least favoured musical instruments. Paper presented to the British Psychological Society London Conference, December 19–20.Google Scholar
Bruce, R. and Kemp, A. (1993). Sex stereotyping in children's preferences for musical instruments; British Journal of Music Education, 10, 3, 213–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, E. (1995). Research expectations and realities. Panel session at Society for Research in Psychology of Music and Music Education Conferencem,University of Leicester,October 21.Google Scholar
Coffman, D. and Sehmann, K. (1989). Musical instrument preference: implications for music educators. Update: The Applications of Research in Music Education, Spring, 32–4.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Science (DES) (1991). National Curriculum Music Working Group Interim Report. London:HMSO.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1993). Music, gender and education: a report on some exploratory research. British Journal of Music Education, 10, 3, 219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, P. and Chroback, D. (1981). Sex-role associations of music instruments and occupations by gender and major. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism, Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
Holt, C. (1991). Sex-role associations of musical instruments and occupations by gender and major: a replication study. Georgia Music News, 52, 1, 54–5.Google Scholar
Howe, M. and Sloboda, J. (1991). Young musicians' accounts of significant influences in their early lives: 2. Teacher, practising and performing. British Journal of Music Education, 8, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vols. I and 2. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. (1966). A Brief Introduction to Personal Construct Theory. Reprinted in Bannister (1970).Google Scholar
Kemp, A. (1981). Personality differences between the players of string, woodwind, brass and keyboard instruments, and singers. Council for Research in Music Education Bulletin, 66–67, 33–8.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. (1993). The possibilities of/for feminist music criticism in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 10,3, 169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, C. (1991). Starting to learn to play: motivational criteria. British Journal of Music Education, 8, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, M. (1992). Musical canon under fire: the challenge of feminist musicology. Australian Journal of Music Education, 5–12.Google Scholar
Maidlow, S. (1984). Saving the life which is your own: the importance of models in the artist's life'. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Maidlow, S. (1993). The attitudes, experiences and expectations of A-level music students. British Journal of Music Education, 10, 3, 169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, K. (ed) (1992). Genderwatch! After the ERA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, K. (1987). Genderwatch! Schools Curriculum Development Committee.Google Scholar
Pope, M. and Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and science of constructivist research in teacher thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 5/6, 529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, S. and Abeles, H. (1979). So your daughter wants to be a drummer?. Music Educators Journal, 01, 46–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadie, J. and Samuel, R. (eds) (1994). The Nezv Grove Dictionary of Women Composers. London:MacMillan.Google Scholar
Sloboda, J. (1995). Research expectations and realities. Panel session at Society for Research in Psychology of Music and Music Education ConferenceUniversity of LeicesterOctober 21.Google Scholar
Tacq, J. (1997). Multivariate Analysis Techniques, in Social Science Research. London:Sage.Google Scholar
Tarnowski, S. (1993). Gender bias and musical instrument preference. Update: The Applications of Research in Music Education, Fall/Winter, 14–21.Google Scholar
Welch, G. (1995). Research expectations and realities. Panel session at Society for Research in Psychology of Music and Music Education Conference,University of Leicester,October 21.Google Scholar