Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T02:09:26.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Affordance of Braille music as a mediational means: significance and limitations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2014

Hyu-Yong Park
Affiliation:
Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, deokjin-gu, Jeonju, 561-756Republic of KoreaPhy1@jbnu.ac.kr
Mi-Jung Kim
Affiliation:
Hanvit Blind School, Suyu-dong, Gangbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of KoreaGd8piano@hanmail.net

Abstract

Affordance refers to the properties or designs of a thing that offer the function of the thing. This paper discusses the affordance of Braille music in terms of three notions: mediational means, mastery and appropriation, and focuses on answering the following three questions: (i) How do musicians with visual impairments (MVI) perceive Braille music and what does it reveal about the characteristics and limitations of Braille music? (ii) What are the traits influencing the affordance of Braille music and how does it fit the needs of MVI? (iii) What are the conditions that make Braille music more affordable? To qualitatively investigate these topics, we interviewed nine music teachers and their seven students with visual impairment at a school for the blind in Korea. We found that learning and mastering Braille music is not an easy task, and that blind musicians tend to depend more on auditory input and memorisation. These findings suggest that the current level of development, diffusion and employment of Braille music is not satisfactory in Korea. In order to promote the affordance of Braille music, the adaptability, learnability/usability and availability of Braille music must be enhanced.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AMERICAN PRINTING HOUSE FOR THE BLIND (2008) Facts and Figures on Americans with Vision Loss. American Foundation for the Blind. http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=15&DocumentID=4398 [Accessed 21 July 2012]Google Scholar
BORTOLAZZI, E., BAPTISTE-JESSEL, N. & BERTONI, G. (2008) BMML: A mark-up language for Braille music. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5105, 310317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CROMBIE, D., DIJKSTRA, S., SCHUT, E. & LINDSAY, N. (2002) Spoken music: enhancing access to music for the print disabled. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2398, 201213.Google Scholar
DANIELS, P. T. & BRIGHT, W. (1996) The World's Writing Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ELDRIDGE, C. (1979) Braille literacy: the best route to equal education. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 73, 331333.Google Scholar
ENGLEBRETSON, R. (2009) An overview of IPA Braille: an updated tactile representation of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 39, 6786.Google Scholar
FARRELL, G. (1956) The Story of Blindness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
FERATI, M., MANNHEIMER, S. & BOLCHINI, D. (2011) Usability evaluation of acoustic interfaces for the blind. In SIGDOC ‘11 Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Design of communication, 9–16.Google Scholar
FREEDMAN, R. (1997) Out of Darkness: The Story of Louis Braille. New York, NY: Clarion Books.Google Scholar
GIBSON, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
GIBSON, E. J. (2000) Perceptual learning in development: Some basic concepts. Ecological Psychology, 12 (4), 295302.Google Scholar
GILL, J. M. & HUMPHREYS, J. B. (1977) The analysis of Braille contractions. In Gill, J. M. & Clark, L. L., Braille Research Newsletter, 5, 5057. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.Google Scholar
GOTO, D., GOTOH, T., MINAMIKAWA-TACHINO, R. & TAMURA, N. (2007) A transcription system from musicXML format to Braille music notation. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 1, 152.Google Scholar
HOMENDA, W. & SITAREK, T. (2011) Notes on automatic music conversion. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6804, 533542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KERSTEN, F. G. (1997) The history and development of Braille music methodology. Bulletin of Historical Research in Music Education, 18, 106125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MELLOR, C. M. (2006) Louis Braille: A Touch of Genius. Boston, MA: National Braille Press.Google Scholar
MOSS, F. W. (2009) Quality of experience in mainstreaming and full inclusion of blind and visually impaired high school instrumental music students. PhD dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
MURPHY, R. R. (1999) Case Studies of Applying Gibson's Ecological Approach to Mobile Robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 29 (1), 105111.Google Scholar
NORMAN, D. A. (1988) The Design of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
NORMAN, D. A. (1999) Affordances, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6 (3), 3841.Google Scholar
OLSTROM, C. E. (2010) Undaunted By Blindness. Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.Google Scholar
RAMSTEIN, C. (1996) Combining haptic and braille technologies: design issues and pilot study. Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (pp. 3744). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
ROSE, D. H., HASSELBRING, T. S., STAHL, S. & ZABALA, J. (2004) Assistive Technology and Universal Design for Learning: Two Sides of the Same Coin. In Edyburn, D., Higgins, K. & Boone, R. (Eds), Handbook of Special Education Technology Research and Practice (pp. 507518). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.Google Scholar
RYLES, R. (2000) Braille as a predictor of success. In National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped (pp. 462491). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
SMALIGO, M. A. (1998) Resources for helping blind music students. Music Educators Journal, 85 (2), 2326.Google Scholar
STEPHENS, O. (1989) Braille: implications for living. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 83, 288289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WERTSCH, J. V. (1997) Collective memory: Issues from a socio-historical perspective. In Cole, M., Engeström, Y. & Vasquez, O. (Eds), Mind, Culture, and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 226232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WERTSCH, J. V. (1998) Properties of mediated action. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Mind as Action (pp. 2372). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar