Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:35:59.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Roman Coin Manufacturing Hoard from Magiovinium, Fenny Stratford, Bucks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

R.J. Zeepvat ,
M. Ponting ,
P.T. Marney ,
J. Lang  and
M. Cowell
R.J. Zeepvat
Affiliation:
Milton Keynes Archaeology Unit
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During July and August 1990 several finds of Roman metalwork and other material were reported to the Milton Keynes Archaeology Unit by metal-detector-users searching on the line of the Fenny Stratford bypass, which was at that time being constructed to the south of Milton Keynes, close to the boundary of the scheduled area covering the site of the small Roman town of Magiovinium. Of particular note among these discoveries was the finding of three coarse-ware vessels containing quantities of copper-alloy coin blanks and pellets, and a pair of possible iron coin dies (PL. IA), reported to the Unit by the finder. After preliminary recording and some statistical analysis by Bob Zeepvat, samples of the coin blanks and pellets were chemically analysed by Matthew Ponting at the Institute of Archaeology, London, while conservation and cleaning of the dies, followed by chemical and physical tests, were undertaken by the Conservation and Scientific Research departments at the British Museum. This work was carried out by Janet Lang and Mike Cowell. The pottery was examined and reported on by Pauline Marney. The hoard remains the property of the landowners, Buckinghamshire County Council, and the initial stages of the watching-brief at Galley Lane were carried out by the Milton Keynes Unit on behalf of the Buckinghamshire County Museum.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 25 , November 1994 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © R.J. Zeepvat 1994. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zeepvat, R.J., ‘Fenny Stratford bypass’, South Midlands Arch. xx (1991), 40–2.Google Scholar

2 D. and Lysons, S., Magna Brittania 1 (part 3, Buckinghamshire) (1806), 483, 485.Google Scholar

3 Neal, D.S., ‘Excavations at Magiovinium, Buckinghamshire, 1978-80’, Rec. Buckinghamshire xxix (1989), 1–124.Google Scholar

4 Collard, M., ‘Magiovinium Roman town, Bow Brickhill’, South Midlands Arch. xviii (1988), 29–30.Google Scholar

5 Woodfield, C., ‘A Roman military site at Magiovinium?’, Rec. Buckinghamshire xx.3 (1977), 384–99.Google Scholar

6 P.T. Marney, Roman and Belgic Pottery from Excavations in Milton Keynes, 1972-1982, Bucks, . Arch. Soc. Mono. Ser. 2 (1989).Google Scholar

7 Gillam, J.P., ‘Coarse fumed ware in north Britain and beyond’, Glasgow Arch. Journ. iv (1976), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 ibid., fig. 2, 18, dated to the late third century.

9 ibid., 63.

10 Marney, op. cit. (note 6), fig. 28, 21.

11 Wilson, M. in Frere, S.S., Verulamium Excavations III, Oxford Univ. Comm. Arch. Mono. 1 (1984), fig. 87. 2133.Google Scholar

12 Szonntagh, E.L., ‘Sampling method for representative elemental analysis of non-homogeneous coins’, Mikrochimica Acta 1981.1 (1981), 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Hughes, M.J., Cowell, M.R. and Craddock, P.T., ‘Atomic absorption techniques in archaeology’. Archaeometry xviii (1976), 22.Google Scholar

14 J. Aitchison, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (1989).

15 Scott, D., Metallography of Ancient Metallic Artifacts, Inst. Arch. Summer Schools Press (1987), 98–111.Google Scholar

16 Knight, B., Observations on Coin Manufacture at North Leigh Roman Villa, unpub. Ancient Monuments Lab. report No. 4407 (1984).Google Scholar

17 Scott, op. cit. (note 15), 22.

18 Cope, L., The Metallurgical Development of the Roman Imperial Coinage during the First Five Centuries A.D., unpub. Ph.D thesis, Liverpool Polytechnic (1974), 168.Google Scholar

19 Knight, op. cit. (note 16).

20 Mattingly, H.B. and Dolby, M.J., ‘The Sprotbrough hoard’. Num. Chron. cxliv (1982), 21–33.Google Scholar

21 Davies, J.A., Barbarous Radiates: a Study of the Irregular Roman Coinage of the 270s and 280s A.D. from Southern England, unpub. Ph.D thesis, Reading University (1988).Google Scholar

22 G.C. Boon, ‘Counterfeit coins in Roman Britain’, in P. Casey (ed.), Coins and the Archaeologist (1988), 102-88.

23 ibid.

24 Cowell, pers. comm.

25 e.g. Bayley, J., ‘Metallurgical analyses’, in Stead, I.M. and Rigby, V. (eds), Baldock: the Excavation of a Roman and Pre-Roman Settlement, Britannia Mono. Ser. 7 (1986), 380–7.Google Scholar

26 R. Ziegler, Der Schatzfund von Brauweiler (1983).

27 ibid., 76.

28 R. Reece, pers. comm.

29 Neal, op. cit. (note 3), figs 2, 8.

30 ibid., 31-2.

31 Davies, J.A., ‘The Meare Heath, Somerset, hoard’, Num. Chron. cxlvi (1986), 106–18.Google Scholar

32 W.H. Manning, Catalogue of the Romano-British Tools, Fittings and Weapons in the British Museum (1986), 9.

33 Davies, J.A., ‘A late Roman bronze punch from Hampshire’, Roman Finds Group Newsletter iii (1986), 5–7.Google Scholar