Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:03:22.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Return to Pre-Injury Work Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2018

Michael Kahan*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand Waikato Occupational Services, Hamilton, New Zealand
Kelly M. Jones
Affiliation:
National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
Shivanthi Balalla
Affiliation:
National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
Kathryn McPherson
Affiliation:
Centre for Person Centred Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand Health Research Council, Auckland, New Zealand
Elisabeth Stedman
Affiliation:
Waikato Occupational Services, Hamilton, New Zealand
Valery L. Feigin
Affiliation:
National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
*
Address for correspondence: Michael Kahan, Laura Ferguson Trust, PO Box 12089 Hamilton, New Zealand. E-mail: mkahan@wos.co.nz
Get access

Abstract

Objective: Adults are at risk for unemployment following a moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Less is known about employment patterns following mild TBI. This study aims to examine patterns of return to pre-injury job in adults following mild TBI over a 12-month post injury period, and to investigate factors associated with return to work. Methods: It is a prospective longitudinal study of 205 adults (aged ≥16 years at injury) identified as part of a larger population-based incidence study in the Waikato, New Zealand. In-person assessments were completed at baseline (within 14 days) and 1-, 6-, and 12-month post-injury. Results: A total of 159 (77.6%) adults returned to their pre-injury job at baseline and 185 (90.2%) returned within 12 months. Of those who did not return to their pre-injury job at baseline (n = 46), younger age at injury (≤30 years, p = .02) and poor overall neurocognitive functioning at 1-month (p = .02) was associated with non-return to pre-injury job at 12 months. Conclusion: In a sample of employed adults, the majority returned to their pre-injury job shortly after injury. Cognitive functioning and younger age at time of injury may be associated with delayed return to work. Interventions to support younger workers may facilitate their return to work.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

BIONIC Study Group members listed below

References

Belanger, H.G., Curtiss, G., Demery, J.A, Lebowitz, B.K., & Vanderploeg, R.D. (2005). Factors moderating neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Neuropsycholgical Society, 11, 215227.Google Scholar
Cancelliere, C., Kristman, V.L., Cassidy, J.D., Hincapié, C.A., Côté, P., Boyle, E., . . . Borg, J. (2014). Systematic review of return to work after mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the international collaboration of mild traumatic brain injury prognosis. Archives Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 95 (Suppl. 3), S201–S209.Google Scholar
Carroll, L.J., Cassidy, J.D., Holm, L., Kraus, J., & Coronado, V.G., WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. (2004). Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: The WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43 (Suppl), 113125.Google Scholar
Colantonio, A., Salehi, S., Kristman, V., Cassidy, J.D., Carter, A., Vartanian, O., . . . Vernich, L. (2016). Return to work after work-related traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation, 39 (3), 389399. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-161370Google Scholar
Corrigan, J.D., Bogner, J.A., Mysiw, W.H., Clinchot, D., & Fugate, L. (2001). Life Satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16 (6), 543555.Google Scholar
Dikmen, S., Machamer, J., & Temkin, N.R. (2016). Mild traumatic brain injury: Longitudinal study of cognition, functional status, and post-traumatic symptoms. Journal of Neurotrauma, 34 (8), https://doi.org.10.1089/neu.2016.4618Google Scholar
Dikmen, S., Temkin, N.R., Machamer, J.E., Holubkov, A., Fraser, R.T., & Winn, H.R. (1994). Employment following traumatic head injuries. Archives of Neurology, 51, 177186.Google Scholar
Drake, A.L., Gray, N., Yoder, S., Pramuka, M., & Llewellyn, M. (2000). Factors predicting return to work following mild traumatic brain injury: A discriminant analysis. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15 (5), 11031112.Google Scholar
Feigin, V.F., Theadom, A., Barker-Collo, S.L., Starkey, N., McPhersonKahan, M. Kahan, M., . . . Ameratunga, S. (2013). Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: A population-based study. Lancet Neurology, 12, 5364.Google Scholar
Friedland, J.F., & Dawson, D.F. (2001). Function after motor vehicle accidents prospective study of mild head injury and postraumatic stress. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 426434.Google Scholar
Greenspan, A.I., Wrigley, J.M., Kresnow, M., Branche-Dorsey, C.M., & Fine, P.R. (1996). Factors influencing failure to return to work due to traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10 (3), 207218.Google Scholar
Greenwald, B., Burnett, D., & Miller, M. (2003). Congenital and acquired brain injury: Epidemiology and pathophysiology. Archives Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 84 (Suppl. 1), S3–S7.Google Scholar
Gualtieri, C.T. (2008). A computerized test battery sensitive to mild and severe brain injury. Medscape Journal of Medicine, 10 (4), 90.Google Scholar
Gualtieri, C.T., & Johnson, L.G. (2006). Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 623643.Google Scholar
Hyder, A., Winderlick, C., Puvanachandra, P., Gururaj, G., & Kobusingye, O. (2007). The impact of traumatic brain injuries: A global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation, 22, 341353.Google Scholar
Ip, R.Y., Dornan, J., & Schentag, C. (1995). Traumatic brain injury: Factors predicting return to work or school. Brain Injury, 9, 517532.Google Scholar
Iverson, G., Lange, R., Gaetz, M., & Zasler, N. (2013a). Mild traumatic brain injury. In Zasler, N., Katz, D.R., Zafonte, R., Arciniegas, D.M., Bullock, M., & Kreutzer, J. (Eds.), Brain injury medicine principles and practices (2nd ed., pp. 434469). New York: Demos Medical Publishing.Google Scholar
Iverson, G.l., Silverberg, N.D., Lange, R.T., & Zasler, N.D. (2013b). Conceptualising outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. In Zasler, N., Katz, D., Zafonte, R., Arciniegas, D., Bullock, M., & Kreutzer, J. (Eds.), Brain injury medicine principles and practices (2nd ed., pp. 470497). New York: Demos Medical Publishing.Google Scholar
Kreutzer, J.S., Marwitz, J.H., Walker, W., Sander, A., Sherer, M., Bogner, J., Fraser, R., & Bushnik, T. (2003). Moderating factors in return to work and job stability after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma and Rehabilitation, 18 (2), 128138.Google Scholar
Maas, A.I., Stocchett, N., & Bullock, R. (2008). Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurology, 7 (8), 728741.Google Scholar
Mathias, J.L., Beall, J.A., & Bigler, E.D. (2004). Neuropsychological and information processing deficits following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10 (2), 286297.Google Scholar
McCrimmon, S., & Oddy, M. (2006). Return to work following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20 (10), 10371046.Google Scholar
Ownsworth, T., & McKenna, K. (2004). Investigation of factors related to employment outcome following traumatic brain injury: A critical review and conceptual model. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26 (13), 765784.Google Scholar
Ponsford, J., Willmott, C., Rothwell, A., Kelly, A.M., Nelms, R., & Ng, K.T. (2004). Use of the Westmead PTA scale to monitor recovery of memory after mild head injury. Brain Injury 18, 603614.Google Scholar
Rao, V., & Lyketsos, C. (2000). Neuropsychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain Injury. Psychosomatics, 41, 95103.Google Scholar
Sherer, M., Novack, T.A., Sander, A.M., Struchen, M.A., Alderson, A., & Thompson, R.N. (2002). Neuropsychological assessment and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury: A review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16 (2), 157178.Google Scholar
Shores, E.A., Marosszeky, J.E., Sandanam, J., & Batchelor, J. (1986). Preliminary validation of a clinical scale for measuring the duration of post-traumatic amnesia. Medical Journal of Australia, 144, 569572.Google Scholar
Steadman-Pare, D., Colantonio, A., Ratcliff, G., Chase, S., & Vernich, L. (2001). Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16 (4), 330342.Google Scholar
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 8184.Google Scholar
Theadom, A., Barker-Collo, S., Feigin, V.L., Starkey, N.J., Parag, V., Jones, K., Dowell, T., & McPherson, K. (2012). The spectrum captured: A methodological approach to studying incidence and outcomes of traumatic brain injury on a population level. Neuroepidemiology, 38, 829.Google Scholar
Theadom, A., Parag, V., Dowell, T., McPherson, K., Starkey, N., Barker-Collo, S., . . . Feigin, V.L. (2016). Persistent problems 1 year after mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal population study in New Zealand. British Journal of General Practice, 66, 1623.Google Scholar
Trewin, D., & Pink, B. (2006). Australian and New Zealand Standard classification of occupations. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Vikane, E., Hellstrøm, T., Røe, C., Bautz-Holter, E., Aßmus, J., & Sture Skouen, J. (2016). Predictors for return to work in subjects with mild traumatic brain injury. Behavioural Neurology, Article ID 8026414, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8026414Google Scholar
Wehman, P., Targett, P., West, M., & Kregel, J. (2005). Production work and employment for persons with traumatic brain injury; What have we learned? Journal of Head Trauma and Rehabilitation, 20 (2), 115127.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (1992). International classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth Revision. Vol 1: Tabular List. Geneva.Google Scholar