Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T03:25:50.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Protocol for Measuring the Direct Psychological Benefit of Neuropsychological Assessment with Feedback in Multiple Sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2012

Wendy A. Longley ,
Robyn L. Tate  and
Rhonda F. Brown
Wendy A. Longley*
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia Client Services, MS Australia – ACT/NSW/VIC, Sydney, Australia
Robyn L. Tate
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia
Rhonda F. Brown
Affiliation:
Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Wendy Longley, Senior Clinical Neuropsychologist, MS Australia – ACT/NSW/VIC, PO Box 210, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia. E-mail: Wendy.longley@msaustralia.org.au
Get access

Abstract

This article reports on the design of a two-arm, randomised controlled trial of neuropsychological assessment with feedback as a direct therapeutic intervention to improve psychological wellbeing in multiple sclerosis (MS). MS patients and their caregivers are randomly allocated to one of two groups: neuropsychological assessment with feedback (the intervention), or ‘sham wait-list’ control. The trial investigates: (1) whether the intervention directly benefits patients by leading to improved knowledge of their own specific cognitive strengths and weaknesses, and improved use of adaptive psychological strategies for coping with MS; and (2) whether the intervention directly benefits caregivers by leading to improved knowledge of the patients’ specific cognitive strengths and weaknesses, and to a more positive caregiving outcome. A range of primary and secondary measures is used to evaluate these outcomes. The protocol utilises a wait-list control method which is structured to effectively blind patients and caregivers to their group allocation. Publishing the protocol prior to the results of the trial being available has a number of important methodological benefits, and informs the research community of the work that is under way to allow for collaboration and to reduce duplication of research effort. (This trial has been registered on the ANZCTR; ACTRN12612000161820.)

Keywords

multiple sclerosiscaregiversneuropsychological assessmentassessment feedbackneurorehabilitation
Type
Controlled Trial Forum
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , September 2012 , pp. 238 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allot, K., Brewer, W., McGorry, P.D., & Proffitt, T.-M. (2011). Referrers’ perceived utility and outcomes of clinical neuropsychological assessment in an adolescent and young adult public mental health service. Australian Psychologist, 46, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, M.P., Ponziani, G., Siracus, G., & Sorbi, S. (2001). Cognitive dysfunction in early-onset multiple sclerosis: A reappraisal after 10 years. Archives of Neurology, 58, 1602–1606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amato, M.P., Portaccio, E., Stromillo, M.L., Goretti, R., Zipoli, V., Siracusa, G., . . . De Stefano, N. (2008). Cognitive assessment and quantitative magnetic resonance metrics can help to identify benign multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 71, 632–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Academy of Neurology. (1996). Assessment: Neuropsychological testing of adults. Considerations for neurologists. Neurology, 47, 592–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arffa, S., & Knapp, J.A. (2008). Parental perceptions of the benefits of neuropsychological assessment in a neurodevelopmental outpatient clinic. Applied Neuropsychology, 15, 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, P.A., Higginson, C.I., Voss, W.D., Randolph, J.J., & Grandey, A.A. (2002). Relationship between coping, cognitive dysfunction and depression in multiple sclerosis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1, 241–355.Google Scholar
Bakas, T., Champion, V., Perkins, S.M., Farran, C.J., & Williams, L.S. (2006). Psychometric testing of the revised 15-item Bakas Care giving Outcome Scale. Nursing Research, 55, 346–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardmore, S., Tate, R., & Liddle, B. (1999). Does information and feedback improve children's knowledge and awareness of deficits after traumatic brain injury? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, W.W., Blanco, C.R., Wilbanks, S.L., Paul, R.H., & Hames, K.A. (1995). Demographic, clinical and cognitive characteristics of multiple sclerosis patients who continue to work. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 9, 167–173.Google Scholar
Belciug, M.P. (2006). Concerns and anticipated challenges of family caregivers following participation in the neuropsychological feedback of stroke patients. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, H.H., Cookfair, D., Gavett, R., Gunther, M., Munschauer, F., Garg, N., & Weinstock-Guttman, B. (2006). Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 549–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, R.H.B., Cox, D., Thompson, L.L., Foley, F., Weinstock-Guttman, B., & Munschauer, F. (2004). Reliable screening for neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 10, 675–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, R.H.B., Munschauer, F., Linn, R., Miller, C., Murphy, E., Foley, F., & Jacobs, L. (2003). Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-administered 15-item questionnaire. Multiple Sclerosis, 9, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, R.H., & Zivadinov, R. (2007). Reliability and validity of neuropsychological screening and assessment strategies in MS. Joural of Neurology, 254 (Suppl 2), 1122–1125.Google ScholarPubMed
Benedict, R.H., & Zivadinov, R. (2011). Risk factors for and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Nature Reviews Neurology, 7, 332–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett-Levy, J., Klein-Boonschate, M.-A., Batchelor, J., McCarter, R., & Walton, N. (1994). Encounters with Anna Thompson: the consumer's experience of neuropsychological assessment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, K.D., & Hall, W. (1986). Statistical power in psychiatric research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 20, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, C.L., Temple, R.O., Tremont, G., Westervelt, H.J., & Stern, R.A. (2003). Utility of the neuropsychological evaluation in an acute medical hospital. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 468–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, D., Beetar, J.T., Yeates, K.O., Boyer, K., Colvin, A.N., & Mangeot, S. (2007). A survey of parent satisfaction with pediatric neuropsychological evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 884–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, M., Tupper, D., Kaufmann, P., McCrea, M., Postal, K., Westerveld, M., . . . Deer, T. (2011). Neuropsychological assessment: A valuable tool in the diagnosis and management of neurological, neurodevelopmental, medical and psychiatric disorders. Cognitive Behavioural Neurology, 24, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiaravalloti, N.D., & DeLuca, J. (2008). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurology, 7, 1139–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chipchase, S.Y., & Lincoln, N.B. (2001). Factors associated with caregiver strain in caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 768–776.Google ScholarPubMed
Correale, J., Peirano, I., & Romano, L. (2012). Benign multiple sclerosis: a new definition of this entity is needed. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 18, 210–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Frias, C.M., & Dixon, R.A. (2005). Confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance of the Memory Compensation Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 17, 168–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E., Emmons, A., Larsen, J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, R.A., de Frias, C.M., & Backman, L. (2001). Characteristics of self-reported memory compensation in older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 650–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endler, N.S., Courbasson, C.M.A., & Fillion, L. (1998b). Coping with cancer: the evidence for the temporal stability of the French–Canadian version of the Coping with Health Injuries and Problems (CHIP). Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, N.S., Parker, J.D.A., & Summerfeldt, L.J. (1998a). Coping with health problems: Developing a reliable and valid multidimensional measure. Psychological Assessment, 10, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J.E., & Brazeal, T. (1998). Parent perception about the process and outcomes of child neuropsychological assessment. Applied Neuropsychology, 5, 194–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figved, N., Myhr, K.-M., Larsen, J.-P., & Aarsland, D. (2007). Caregiver burden in multiple sclerosis: the impact of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 78, 1097–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlayson, M., & Cho, C. (2008). A descriptive profile of caregivers of older adults with multiple sclerosis and the assistance they provide. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 1847–1857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, J.S., Foley, F.W., Aikens, J.E., Ericson, G.D., Rao, S.M., & Shindell, S. (1994). What do we really know about cognitive dysfunction, affective disorders, and stress in multiple sclerosis? A practitioner's guide. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 8, 151–164.Google Scholar
Fortinsky, R.H., Kercher, K., & Burant, C.J. (2002). Measurement and correlates of family caregiver self-efficacy for managing dementia. Aging and Mental Health, 6, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, J.A., Langdon, D.W., Hobart, J.C., & Thompson, A.J. (1997). The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 42, 236–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuchs, K.L. (2009). Team focus: Neuropsychologist. International Journal of MS Care, 11, 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, C.S., & Brown, M.C. (1992). Neuropsychological test feedback to patients with brain dysfunction. Psychological Assessment, 4, 272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorske, T.T. (2008). Therapeutic neuropsychological assessment: a humanistic model and case example. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48, 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakim, E.A., Bakheit, A.M., Bryant, T.N., Roberts, M.W.H., McIntosh-Michaelis, S.A., Spackman, A.J., . . . McLellan, D.L. (2000). The social impact of multiple sclerosis – a study of 305 patients and their relatives. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 288–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, J.D., & Crawford, J.R. (2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginson, C.I., Arnett, P.A., & Voss, W.D. (2000). The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hohol, M.J., Orav, E.J, & Weiner, H.L. (1995). Disease Steps in Multiple Sclerosis: A simple approach to evaluate disease progression. Neurology, 45, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holst, Y., Nyman, H., & Larsson, J.-O. (2009). Predictors of patient satisfaction with the feedback after a neuropsychological assessment. The Open Psychiatry Journal, 3, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadoulle, V., Rokbani, L., Ogez, D., Maccioni, J., Lories, G., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., & Constant, A. (2006). Coping and adaptation to breast cancer: a six-month prospective study. Bulletin of Cancer, 93, 67–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Jonsson, A., Andresen, J., Storr, L., Tscherning, T., Soelberg Sorensen, P., & Ravnborg, M. (2006). Cognitive impairment in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients: a 4-year follow-up study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 245, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalmar, J.H., Gaudino, E.A., Moore, N.B, Halper, J., & DeLuca, D. (2008). The relationship between cognitive deficits and everyday functional activities in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 22, 442–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, F., McPhail, T., Brand, C., Turner-Stokes, L., & Kilpatrick, T. (2006). Multiple Sclerosis: Disability profile and quality of life in an Australian community cohort. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, F., Pallant, J.F., Brand, C., & Kilpatrick, T.J. (2008). Effectiveness of rehabilitation intervention in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 79, 1230–1235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langdon, D.W. (1998). Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 19, S429–S442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langdon, D.W., & Thompson, A.J. (1999). Multiple sclerosis: A preliminary study of selected variables affecting rehabilitation outcome. Multiple Sclerosis, 5, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lincoln, N.B., Dent, A., Harding, J., Weyman, N., Nicholl, C., Blumhardt, L.D., & Playford, E.D. (2002). Evaluation of cognitive assessment and cognitive intervention for people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longley, W.A. (2007). Multiple sclerosis-related dementia: relatively rare and often misunderstood. Brain Impairment, 8, 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, S.H., & Lovibond, P.F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychological Foundation.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. (2002). Cognitive assessment and neurological rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 575–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinney, M., Blake, H., Treece, K.A., Lincoln, N.B., Playford, E.D., & Gladman, J.R.F. (2002). Evaluation of cognitive assessment in stroke rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medical Advisory Board of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, USA. (2008). Expert opinion paper: assessment and management of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. New York: National Multiple Sclerosis Society.Google Scholar
Montel, S.R., & Bungener, C. (2007). Coping and quality of life in one hundred and thirty five subjects with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 13, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, F., Trauer, T., Dodd, S., Callaly, T., Campbell, S., & Berk, M. (2007). The validity of the 21-item version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales as a routine clinical outcome measure. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 19, 304–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, A.R., Chiaravalloti, N., Goverover, Y., & DeLuca, J. (2008). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: A review of the literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 761–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pachana, N.A., Squelch, N.S., & Paton, H. (2010). The importance of feedback and communication strategies with older adults: therapeutic and ethical considerations. In K. Laidlow & B. Knight (Eds.), Casebook of clinical geropsychology: International perspectives on practice (pp. 155–172). London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakenham, K.I. (2007). The nature of care giving in multiple sclerosis: Development of the Care Giving Tasks in Multiple Sclerosis Scale. Multiple Sclerosis, 13, 929–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepping, M., & Ehde, D. (2005). Neuropsychological evaluation and treatment of multiple sclerosis: the importance of a neuro-rehabilitation focus. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 16, 411–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, G.R., Sarason, I.G., & Sarason, B.R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: are two constructs better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1028–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, G.R., Sarason, I.G., Sarason, B.R., Solky-Butzel, J.A., & Nagle, L.C. (1997). Assessing the quality of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poston, J.M., & Hanson, W.E. (2010). Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention. Psychological Assessment, 22, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, S.M., Leo, G.J., Ellington, L., Nauertz, T., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology, 41, 692–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigby, S.A., Domenech, C., Thornton, E.W., Tedman, S., & Young, C.A. (2003). Development and validation of a self-efficacy measure for people with multiple sclerosis: the Multiple Sclerosis Self-efficacy Scale. Multiple Sclerosis, 9, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultheis, M.T., Garay, E., Millis, S.R., & DeLuca, J. (2002). Motor vehicle crashes and violations among drivers with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 83, 1175–1178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shawaryn, M.A., Schultheis, M.T., Garay, E., & DeLuca, B.S. (2002). Assessing functional status: Exploring the relationship between the multiple sclerosis functional composite and driving. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 83, 1123–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, I., & Leathem, J. (1999). Factors affecting performance in cross-cultural neuropsychology: From a New Zealand bicultural perspective. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 83–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solari, A. (2010). Methodological aspects of randomized controlled trials on cognitive interventions. Neurological Science, 31 (Suppl 2), S279–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temple, R.O., Carvalho, J., & Tremont, G. (2006). A national survey of physicians’ use of and satisfaction with neuropsychological services. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P.W., Thomas, S., Hillier, C., Galvin, K., & Baker, R. (2006). Psychological interventions for multiple sclerosis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 1. 2006. Art. No.: CD004431.pub2. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004431.pub2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremont, G., Westervelt, H.J., Javorsky, D.J., Podolanczuk, A., & Stern, R.A. (2002). Referring physicians’ perceptions of the neuropsychological evaluation: How are we doing? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 551–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tribe, K., Longley, W.A., Fulcher, G., Faine, R., Blagus, L., Pearce, G., . . . Henderson, E. (2006). Living with multiple sclerosis in NSW, Australia, at the beginning of the 21st Century: Impact of mobility disability. International Journal of MS Care, 8, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitaliano, P.P., Russo, J., Young, H.M., Becker, J., & Maiuro, R.D. (1991). The screen for caregiver burden. The Gerontologist, 31, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, D.T. (2002). Cognitive assessment and neurological rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 117–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldron-Perrine, B., Rapport, L.J., Ryan, K.A., & Harper, K.T. (2008). Prediction of life satisfaction among care-givers of people with multiple sclerosis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 462–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, K.W. (1978). Neuropsychology: A clinical approach. Oxford, England: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Westervelt, H.J., Brown, L.B., Tremont, G., Javorsky, D.J., & Stern, R.A. (2007). Patient and family perceptions of the neuropsychological evaluation: How are we doing? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wild, K.V., Lezak, M.D., Whitham, R.H., & Bourdette, D.N. (1991). Psychological impact of cognitive impairment in the multiple sclerosis patient [abstract]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 74.Google Scholar
Wilson, B.A. (2002). Towards a comprehensive model of cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B.A. (2008). Neuropsychological rehabilitation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed