Skip to main content Accessibility help

Human disturbance and conspecifics influence display site selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda



Understanding habitat selection and assessing habitat quality have an important role in habitat management and prioritisation of areas for protection. However, interpretations of habitat selection and habitat quality can be confounded by social effects such as conspecific attraction. Using 7 years’ data from a well monitored Great Bustard Otis tarda population in Central Europe, we investigated the roles of human disturbance and social cues in display site selection of male Great Bustards Otis tarda. The spatial distribution of displaying males was best predicted by human disturbance. In addition, the number of males attending display sites was strongly correlated to the number of females present and not with disturbance. This suggests that abundance could be a misleading metric for habitat quality in social species. Our results highlight the roles of disturbance and social cues in male habitat choice, and suggest that social factors need to be taken into consideration for management of endangered populations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Human disturbance and conspecifics influence display site selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Human disturbance and conspecifics influence display site selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Human disturbance and conspecifics influence display site selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda
      Available formats


Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence; e-mail:


Hide All
Ahlering, M. A. and Faaborg, J. (2006) Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: If you build it, will they come? Auk 123: 301312.
Ahlering, M. A., Arlt, D., Betts, M. G., Fletcher, R. J., Nocera, J. J. and Ward, M. P. (2010) Research needs and recommendations for the use of conspecific-attraction methods in the conservation of migratory songbirds. Condor 112: 252264.
Alatalo, R. V., Hoglund, J. and Lundberg, A. (1991) Lekking in the Black Grouse - a test of male viability. Nature 352: 155156.
Alonso, J. C., Martin, C. A., Alonso, J. A., Palacin, C., Magana, M. and Lane, S. J. (2004) Distribution dynamics of a Great Bustard metapopulation throughout a decade: influence of conspecific attraction and recruitment. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 16591674.
Augustin, N. H., Mugglestone, M. A. and Buckland, S. T. (1996) An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 339347.
Beehler, B. M. and Foster, M. S. (1988) Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. Am. Nat. 131: 203219.
Beyer, H. L. (2004) Hawth’s analysis tools for ArcGIS. Available at
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., and White, J. S. S. (2008) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:127135.
Bradbury, J., Gibson, R. and Tsai, I. M. (1986) Hotspots and the dispersion of leks. Anim. Behav. 34: 16941709.
Bradbury, J. W., Gibson, R. M., McCarthy, C. E. and Vehrencamp, S. L. (1989) Dispersion of displaying male Sage Grouse. 2. The role of female dispersion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 1524.
Burnham, K. and Anderson, D. (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference. New York: Springer.
Burnside, R. J., Carter, I., Dawes, A., Waters, D., Lock, L., Goriup, P. and Székely, T. (2012) The UK Great Bustard Otis tarda reintroduction trial: a 5 year progress report. Oryx 46: 112121.
Carney, K. M. and Sydeman, W. J. (1999) A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds. Waterbirds 22: 6879.
Crawley, M. J. (2007) The R book. UK: Wiley Publishing.
Cresswell, W. (2008) Non-lethal effects of predation in birds. Ibis 150: 317.
Crist, E. P. and Cicone, R. C. (1984) A physically-based transformation of thematic mapper data- the TM tasseled cap. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 22: 256263.
Doligez, B., Danchin, E. and Clobert, J. (2002) Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 297: 11681170.
Dutta, S., Rahmani, A. R. and Jhala, Y. V. (2011) Running out of time? The Great Indian Bustard Ardeotis nigriceps-status, viability, and conservation strategies. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 57: 615625.
Eastman, J. R. (2003) Idrisi Kilimanjaro. (Guide to GIS and image processing .). Worcester: Clark Labs.
Ecsedi, Z., ed. (2004) A Hortobágy Madárvilága. Hortobágy Természetvédelmi Egyesület, Winter Fair. Szeged, Hungary: Balmazújváros.
Fletcher, R. J. Jr. (2007) Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection. J. Anim. Ecol. 76: 598606.
Fletcher, R. J. and Sieving, K. E. (2010) Social-information use in heterogeneous landscapes: a prospectus. Condor 112: 225234.
Freckleton, R. P. (2002) On the misuse of residuals in ecology: regression of residuals vs. multiple regression. J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 542545.
Frid, A. and Dill, L. (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv. Ecol. 6: 16.
Garcia, J., Suarez-Seoane, S., Miquelez, D., Osborne, P. E. and Zumalacarregui, C. (2007) Spatial analysis of habitat quality in a fragmented population of Little Bustard (Tetrax tetrax): implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 137: 4556.
Gautier, P., Olgun, K., Uzum, N. and Miaud, C. (2006) Gregarious behaviour in a salamander: attraction to conspecific chemical cues in burrow choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59: 836841.
Gill, J. A., Norris, K. and Sutherland, W. J. (2001) The effects of disturbance on habitat use by Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa . J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 846856.
Goss-Custard, J. D., Triplet, P., Sueur, F. and West, A. D. (2006) Critical thresholds of disturbance by people and raptors in foraging wading birds. Biol. Conserv. 127: 8897.
Gray, T. N. E., Chamnan, H., Borey, R., Collar, N. J. and Dolman, P. M. (2007) Habitat preferences of a globally threatened bustard provide support for community-based conservation in Cambodia. Biol. Conserv. 138: 341350.
Hoeck, H. N. (1989) Demography and competition in hyrax. A 17 years study. Oecologia 79: 353360.
Höglund, J. and Alatalo, R. V. (1995) Leks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Höglund, J., Montgomerie, R. and Widemo, F. (1993) Costs and consequences of variation in the size of Ruff leks. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 3139.
Huang, C., Wylie, B., Yang, L., Homer, C. and Zylstra, G. (1998) Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance. Sioux Falls: Raytheon ITSS USGS EROS Data Center. [ accessed, 12/06/10].
Jiguet, F. and Bretagnolle, V. (2006) Manipulating lek size and composition using decoys: an experimental investigation of lek evolution models. Am. Nat. 168: 758768.
Johnson, M. D. (2007) Measuring habitat quality: a review. Condor 109: 489504.
Jones, J. (2001) Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk 118: 557562.
Kappes, P. J., Mcchesney, G. J., Parker, M. W., Carter, H. R., Kress, S. W. and Golightly, R. T. (2011) Use of time-activity budgets to measure early progress of a social attraction restoration project. Biol. Conserv. 144: 620626.
Kauth, R. J. and Thomas, G. S. (1976) The tasseled cap – a graphic description of the spectral temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. Pp. 4151 in Proceedings of the symposium on machine processing of remotely sensed data. West Lafayette: Perdue University.
Lane, S. J., Alonso, J. C. and Martin, C. A. (2001) Habitat preferences of Great Bustard Otis tarda flocks in the arable steppes of central Spain: are potentially suitable areas unoccupied? J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 193203.
Manor, R. and Saltz, D. (2003) Impact of human nuisance disturbance on vigilance and group size of a social ungulate. Ecol. Appl. 13: 18301834.
Martin, C. A., Alonso, J. C., Alonso, J. A., Palacin, C., Magana, M. and Martin, B. (2008) Natal dispersal in Great Bustards: the effect of sex, local population size and spatial isolation. J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 326334.
Miller, S. G., Knight, R. L. and Clinton, K. M. (1998) Influence of recreational trails on breeding bird communities. Ecol. Appl. 8: 162169.
Morales, M. B. and Martin, C. (2003) Otis tarda, Great Bustard. Birds of the Western Palearctic Update: 4: 217232.
Morales, M. B., Jiguet, F. and Arroyo, B. (2001) Exploded leks: what bustards can teach us? Ardeola 48: 8598.
Morales, M. B., Suarez, F. and De La Morena, E. L. G. (2006) Response of steppe birds to various levels of farming intensity and of modification of the agricultural landscape: a comparative analysis of their effects on population density and habitat selection in the Little and Great Bustards (Tetrax tetrax and Otis tarda). Revue d’ Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 61: 261270.
Morris, D. W. (2003) Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136: 113.
Muller, K. L., Stamps, J. A., Krishnan, V. V. and Willits, N. H. (1997) The effects of conspecific attraction and habitat quality on habitat selection in territorial birds (Troglodytes aedon). Am. Nat. 150: 650661.
Mundry, R. (2011) Issues in information theory-based statistical inference - a commentary from a frequentist’s perspective. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 5768.
Oro, D., Martinez-Abrain, A., Villuendas, E., Sarzo, B., Minguez, E., Carda, J. and Genovart, M. (2011) Lessons from a failed translocation program with a seabird species: Determinants of success and conservation value. Biol. Conserv. 144: 851858.
Osborne, P. E., Alonso, J. C. and Bryant, R. G. (2001) Modelling landscape-scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing: a case study with Great Bustards. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 458471.
Palacin, C. and Alonso, J. C. (2008) An updated estimate of the world status and population trends of the Great Bustard Otis tarda. Ardeola 55: 1325.
Parker, M. W., Kress, S. W., Golightly, R. T., Carter, H. R., Parsons, E. B., Schubel, S. E., Boyce, J. A., Mcchesney, G. J. and Wisely, S. M. (2007) Assessment of social attraction techniques used to restore a Common Murre colony in central California. Waterbirds 30: 1728.
Patten, M. A. and Kelly, J. F. (2010) Habitat selection and the perceptual trap. Ecol. Appl. 20: 21482156.
R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [, accessed 2 May 2011].
Root-Bernstein, M. and Ladle, R. J. (2010) Conservation by design. Conserv. Biol. 24: 12051211.
Sastre, P., Ponce, C., Palacin, C., Martin, C. A. and Alonso, J. C. (2009) Disturbances to Great Bustards (Otis tarda) in central Spain: human activities, bird responses and management implications. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 55: 425432.
Schlaepfer, M. A., Runge, M. C. and Sherman, P. W. (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 474480.
Skagen, S. K. and Adams, A. A. Y. (2011) Potential misuse of avian density as a conservation metric. Conserv. Biol. 25: 4855.
Smith, A. T. and Peacock, M. M. (1990) Conspecific attraction and the determination of metapopulation colonization rates. Conserv. Biol. 4: 320323.
Sowerby, A. D. C. (1914) Fur and feather in North China. Tientsin: Tientsin Press.
Speziale, K. L., Lambertucci, S. A. and Olsson, O. (2008) Disturbance from roads negatively affects Andean Condor habitat use. Biol. Conserv. 141: 17651772.
Stamps, J. A. (1988) Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. Am. Nat. 131: 329347.
Suarez-Seoane, S., Osborne, P. E. and Alonso, J. C. (2002) Large-scale habitat selection by agricultural steppe birds in Spain: identifying species-habitat responses using generalized additive models. J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 755771.
Székely, T. (1992) Reproduction of Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus in grasslands and fish-ponds: the habitat mal-assessment hypothesis. Aquila 99: 5968.
Vanhorne, B. (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 47: 893901.
Ward, M. P. and Schlossberg, S. (2004) Conspecific attraction and the conservation of territorial songbirds. Conserv. Biol. 18: 519525.
Weddell, B. J. (1991) Distribution and movements of Columbian Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus): are habitat patches like islands? J. Biogeogr 18: 385394.
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

BURNSIDE et al. supplementary material
Supplementary tables

 Word (15 KB)
15 KB

Human disturbance and conspecifics influence display site selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed