Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:15:33.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High variation in roost use by Dunlin wintering in California: Implications for habitat limitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2008

Jesse R. Conklin*
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, U.S.A
Mark. A Colwell
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, U.S.A
Nancy W. Fox-Fernandez
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, U.S.A
*
*Author for correspondance; e-mail: conklin.jesse@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Effective shorebird conservation requires a greater understanding of use and availability of high-tide roosts in coastal non-breeding areas. In this paper, we explore 1) variation in use of roosts; 2) landscape and environmental correlates of roost use; and 3) responses to predators and humans at roosts, to evaluate roost availability for a wintering population of Dunlin Calidris alpina pacifica at Humboldt Bay, CA, USA. For four winters (2002–2005), Dunlin use of particular roosts was highly variable at the population and individual level, even at the most-used roosts. In any given day, week, or month, most Dunlin roosts were unused, and we continued to record new roosts even in the fourth year of study. Although roost use was influenced by landscape attributes, time of day, and environmental conditions, these variables left most variation in roost use unexplained. Dunlin departures from roosts were associated with the presence of avian predators, but not with human activity. Collectively, these observations revealed no strong evidence that roost availability was limited. This contrasts with findings of other studies, even after considering differences in methodology and spatial scale of analysis. We discuss implications for the interpretation of movement data, protection and/or creation of roosting habitat, and assessment of roost quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 2008