Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T01:39:35.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation and species lists: taxonomic neglect promotes the extinction of endemic birds, as exemplified by taxa from eastern Atlantic islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

C. J. Hazevoet
C. J. Hazevoet
Affiliation:
Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When formulating conservation priorities, conservation biologists often rely on published lists of species-level taxa. This paper discusses the nature and taxonomic status of “species” and “subspecies” and different ways of defining “species”. Species are here taken to be terminal and evolutionarily independent units which are qualitatively diagnosable and reproductively cohesive; genealogical biodiversity is thus taken for what it is in the first place, namely the observable result of evolutionary history, an approach which has become known as the phylogenetic species concept (PSC). In contrast to the widely applied Mayrian or “biological” species concept (BSC), no inferences are made about how the degree of morphological differentiation of allopatric but seemingly closely related taxa translates in the absence or presence of reproductive isolation. Many diagnosably distinct endemic island taxa have traditionally been treated as “subspecies” of widespread “polytypic biological” species. At the same time, the “subspecies” category is also used to name arbitrarily delimited sections of intraspecific clinal variation. Thus, the “subspecies” category subjects entirely different evolutionary phenomena to the same hierarchical level through the use of trinomials. Nevertheless, and despite the discrepancy in ontological status among its contents, “subspecies” are usually considered to be of lower evolutionary and/or conservation status than “species” and this has resulted in low conservation priorities allotted to diagnosably distinct island endemics, many of which have traditionally been considered to be “merely Mayrian subspecies”. This has been recognized by some authorities who, because of the threatened status of certain island taxa, advocated treating them binomially in order to generate appropriate conservation measures to save them from extinction, without however justifying their action by any sort of phylogenetic reasoning. Although well intended and sometimes quite successful as regards the follow-up by conservationists, this demonstrates the arbitrary manner in which “species” can be defined under the BSC. Some examples of endemic taxa from eastern Atlantic islands are discussed, demonstrating the way “list thinking” and the lack of phylogenetic reasoning among conservationists translates into the presence or absence of conservation actions. Some of the criticisms of the PSC by adherents of the BSC are discussed. It is advocated that conservationists replace “list thinking” with “lineage thinking”.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 181 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1996

References

Amadon, D. and Short, L. L. (1992) Taxonomy of lower categories - suggested guidelines. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 112A: 11–38.Google Scholar
AOU (1983) Check-list of North American birds. Sixth edition. American Ornithologists' Union.Google Scholar
Avise, J. C. and Ball, R. M. (1991) Mitochondrial DNA and avian microevolution. Pp.514–524 in Bell, B. D., ed. Ada XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. Wellington, N.Z.: New Zealand Ornithological Congress Trust Board.Google Scholar
Avise, J. C. and Nelson, W. S. (1989) Molecular genetic relationships of the extinct Dusky Seaside Sparrow. Science 243: 646–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, R. M. and Avise, J. C. (1992) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeographic differentiation among avian populations and the evolutionary significance of subspecies. Auk 109: 626–636.Google Scholar
Ball, R. M., James, F. C, Freeman, S., Bermingham, E. and Avise, J. C. (1988) Phylogeographic population structure of Red-winged Blackbirds assessed by mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. 85: 1558–1562.Google Scholar
Barrowclough, G. F. (1980) Genetic and phenotypic differentiation in a wood warbler (genus Dendroica) hybrid zone. Auk 97: 655–668.Google Scholar
Barrowclough, G. F. (1992) Systematics, biodiversity, and conservation biology. Pp. 121–143 in Eldredge, N., ed. Systematics, ecology, and the biodiversity crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bibby, C. J., Charlton, T. D. and Ramos, J. (1992) Studies of West Palearctic birds 191: Azores Bullfinch. Brit. Birds 85: 677–680.Google Scholar
Bourne, W. R. P. (1983) The Soft-plumaged Petrel, the Gon-gon and the Freira, Pterodroma mollis, P. feae and P. madeira. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 103: 52–58.Google Scholar
Bourne, W. R. P. (1986) Recent work on the origin and suppression of bird species in the Cape Verde Islands, especially the shearwaters, the herons, the kites and the sparrows. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 106: 163–170.Google Scholar
Bourne, W. R. P. and Casement, M. B. (1993) RNBWS checklist of seabirds. Sea Swallow 42: 16–27.Google Scholar
Capparella, A. P. (1988) Genetic variation in Neotropical birds: implications for the speciation process. Pp. 1658–1664 in Ouellet, H., ed. Ada XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Capparella, A. P. and Lanyon, S. M. (1985) Biochemical and morphometric analyses of sympatric, neotropical, sibling species Mionectes macconelli, and M. oleagineus. Pp.347–355 in Buckley, P. A., Foster, M. S., Morton, E. S., Ridgely, R. S. and Buckley, F. G., eds. Neotropical ornithology. Washington D.C.: American Ornithologists' Union (Orn. Monogr. 36).Google Scholar
Chylarecki, P. (1993) New Herring Gull taxonomy. Brit. Birds 86: 316–319.Google Scholar
Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J. and Stattersfield, A. J. (1994) Birds to watch 2: the world list of threatened birds. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conserv. Ser. 4).Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1983) Species concepts and speciation analysis, Current Orn. 1: 159–187.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1986) Origin and evolution of continental biotas: speciation and historical congruence within the Australian avifauna. Evolution 40: 977–996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cracraft, J. (1987) Species concepts and the ontology of evolution. Biol. Philos. 2: 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1989a) Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation. Pp. 28–59 in Otte, D. and Endler, J. A., eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1989b) Species as entities of biological theory. Pp.31–52 in Ruse, M., ed. Wlmt the philosophy of biology is. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1992) The species of the birds-of-paradise (Paradisaeidae): applying the phylogenetic species concept to a complex pattern of diversification. Cladistics 8: 1–43.Google Scholar
Crowe, T. M. (1993) Species as units of evolution, classification and conservation. Pp. 17–19 in Wilson, R. T., ed. Birds and the African environment: Proceedings of the Eighth Pan-African Ornithological Congress. Tervuren: Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale (Ann. Mus. R. Afr. Centr. [Zool.] 268).Google Scholar
Crowe, T. M., Essop, M. F., Allan, D. G., Brooke, R. K. and Komen, J. (1994) ‘Overlooked’ units of comparative and conservation biology: a case study of a small African bustard, the Black Korhaan Eupodotis afra. Ibis 136: 166–175.Google Scholar
Crowe, T. M. and Siegfried, W. R. (1993) A southern African perspective of conservation biology. Pp. 285–286 in Wilson, R. T., ed. Birds and the African environment: Proceedings of the Eighth Pan-African Ornithological Congress. Tervuren: Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale (Ann. Mus. R. Afr. Centr. [Zool.] 268).Google Scholar
Daugherty, C. H., Cree, A., Hay, J. M. and Thompson, M. B. (1990) Neglected taxonomy and continuing extinctions of tuatara (Sphenodon). Nature 347: 177–179.Google Scholar
Daugherty, C. H. and Triggs, S. J. (1991) Population differentiation in New Zealand birds. Pp. 525–533 in Bell, B. D., ed. Ada XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. Wellington, N.Z.: New Zealand Ornithological Congress Trust Board.Google Scholar
Davis, J. I. and Nixon, K. C. (1992) Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Syst. Biol. 41: 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devillers, P. and Devillers-Terschuren, J. (1994) Essai d'analyse systématique du genre Ophrys. Nat. Beiges (Orchid. 7, Suppl.) 75: 273–400.Google Scholar
Donoghue, M. J. (1985) A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist 88: 172–181.Google Scholar
Echelle, A. A. (1990) In defence of the phylogenetic species concept and the ontological status of hybridogenetic taxa. Herpetologica 46: 109–113.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. (1992) Where the twain meet: causal intersections between the genealogical and ecological realms. Pp. 1–14 in Eldredge, N., ed. Systematics, ecology and the biodiversity crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Escalante-Pliego, B. P. (1991) Genetic differentiation in yellowthroats (Parulinae: Geothlypis). Pp. 333–341 in Bell, B. D., ed. Ada XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. Wellington, N.Z.: New Zealand Ornithological Congress Trust Board.Google Scholar
Frost, D. R. and Hillis, D. M. (1990) Species in concept and practice: herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46: 87–104.Google Scholar
Galbraith, I. C. J. (1956) Variation, relationships and evolution in the Pachycephala pectoralis superspecies. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.). Zool. 4: 133–222.Google Scholar
Hazevoet, C. J. (1989) Notes on behaviour and breeding of the Razo Lark Alauda razae. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 109: 82–86.Google Scholar
Hazevoet, C. J. (1992) A review of the Santiago Purple Heron Ardea purpurea bournei, with a report of a new colony. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 2: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazevoet, C. J. (1993) On the history and type specimens of the Cape Verde Cane Warbler Acrocephalus brevipennis (Keulemans, 1866) (Aves, Sylviidae). Bijdr. Dierkd. 62: 249–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazevoet, C. J. (1994a) Species concepts and systematics. Dutch Birding 16: 111–116.Google Scholar
Hazevoet, C. J. (1994b) Status and conservation of seabirds in the Cape Verde Islands. Pp. 279–293 in Nettleship, D. N., Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M., eds. Seabirds on islands: threats, case studies and action plans. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conserv. Ser. 1).Google Scholar
Hazevoet, C. J. (1995) The birds of the Cape Verde Islands. Tring: British Ornithologists' Union (BOU Check-list 13).Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
ICBP (1992) Putting biodiversity on the map: priority areas for global conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: International Council for Bird Preservation.Google Scholar
James, F. C.(1983) Environmental component of morphological differentiation in birds. Science 221: 184–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knox, A. (1994) Lumping and splitting of species. Brit. Birds 87: 149–159.Google Scholar
Lidén, M. and Oxelman, B. (1989) Species: pattern or process? Taxon 38: 228–232.Google Scholar
Livezey, B.C.(1990) Evolutionary morphology of flightlessness in the Auckland Islands Teal. Condor 92: 639–673.Google Scholar
Livezey, B. C. (1991) A phylogenetic analysis and classification of recent dabbling ducks (Tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. Auk 108: 471–507.Google Scholar
Livezey, B. C. (1995a) Phylogeny and evolutionary ecology of modern seaducks (Anatidae: Mergini). Condor 97: 233–255.Google Scholar
Livezey, B. C. (1995b) Phylogeny and comparative ecology of stiff-tailed ducks (Anatidae: Oxyurini). Wilson Bull. 107: 214–234.Google Scholar
Loope, L. L., Hamann, O. and Stone, C. P. (1988) Comparative conservation biology of oceanic archipelagoes: Hawaii and the Galápagos. BioScience 38: 272–282.Google Scholar
Maddison, D. R., Ruvolo, M. and Swofford, D. L. (1992) Geographic origins of human mitochondrial DNA: phylogenetic evidence from control region sequences. Syst. Biol. 41: 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, G. M. (1934) The Soft-plumaged Petrel, Pterodroma mollis, and its subspecies. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 54: 178–179.Google Scholar
May, R. M. (1990) Taxonomy as destiny. Nature 347: 129–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1940) Speciation phenomena in birds. Amer. Nat. 74: 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
McKitrick, M. and Zink, R. M. (1988) Species concepts in ornithology. Condor 90: 1–14.Google Scholar
Mishler, B. D. and Brandon, R. N. (1987) Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol. Philos. 2: 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morony, J. J., Bock, W. J. and Farrand, J. (1975) Reference list of the birds of the world. New York: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. J. (1989) Cladistics and evolutionary models. Cladistics 5: 275–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, G. J. and Platnick, N. I. (1981) Systematics and biogeography: cladistics and vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, K. C. and Wheeler, Q. D. (1990) An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6: 211–223.Google Scholar
O'Brien, S. J. and Mayr, E. (1991) Bureaucratic mischief: recognizing endangered species and subspecies. Science 251: 1187–1188.Google Scholar
O'Hara, R. J. (1993) Systematic generalization, historical fate, and the species problem. Syst. Biol. 43: 231–246.Google Scholar
O'Hara, R. J. (1994) Evolutionary history and the species problem. Amer. Zool. 34: 12–22.Google Scholar
Olson, S. L. (1994) Cranial osteology of Tawny and Steppe Eagles Aquila rapax and A. nipalensis. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 114: 264–267.Google Scholar
Paterson, H. E. H.(1985) The recognition concept of species. Pp. 21–29 in Vrba, E. S., ed. Species and speciation. Pretoria: Transvaal Museum (Transvaal Mus. Monogr. 4).Google Scholar
Prum, R. O. (1994) Species status of the White-fronted Manakin, Lepidothrix serena (Pipridae), with comments on conservation biology. Condor 96: 692–702.Google Scholar
Raikow, R. J.(1985) Problems in avian classification. Current Orn. 2: 187–212.Google Scholar
Remsen, J. V.(1994) Use and misuse of bird lists in community ecology and conservation. Auk 111: 225–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (1992) The species problem and conservation: what are we protecting? Conserv. Biol. 6: 170–178.Google Scholar
Salvadori, T. (1899) Collezioni ornitologiche fatte nelle isole del Capo Verde da Leonardo Fea. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. (Genova) (Ser. 2) 20: 283–312.Google Scholar
Short, L. L. (1993) The nature of species, and classification, and their importance for conservation. Pp. 11–16 in Wilson, R. T., ed. Birds and the African environment: Proceedings of the Eighth Pan-African Ornithological Congress. Tervuren: Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale (Ann. Mus. R. Afr. Centr. [Zool.] 268).Google Scholar
Sibley, C. G. and Ahlquist, J. E. (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sibley, C. G. and Monroe, B. L.(1990) Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel-Causey, D. (1988) Phylogeny of the Phalacrocoracidae. Condor 90: 885–905.Google Scholar
Sluys, R. (1991) Species concepts, process analysis, and the hierarchy of nature. Experientia 47: 1162–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, A. R. (1989) The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. Pp. 3–27 in Otte, D. and Endler, J. A., eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. M. and Heath, M. F. (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conserv. Ser. 3).Google Scholar
Zink, R. M. (1986) Patterns and evolutionary significance of geographic variation in the schistacea group of the Fox Sparrow (Passerella iliaca). Washington, D.C.: American Ornithologists' Union (Orn. Monogr. 40).Google Scholar
Zink, R. M. (1988) Evolution of Brown Towhees: allozymes, morphometrics and species limits. Condor 90: 72–82.Google Scholar
Zink, R. M. (1994) The geography of mitochondrial DNA variation, population structure, hybridization, and species limits in the Fox Sparrow (Passerella iliaca). Evolution 48: 96–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Zink, R. M. and Dittmann, D. L. (1991) Evolution of Brown Towhees: mitochondrial DNA evidence. Condor 93: 98–105.Google Scholar
Zink, R. M. and Remsen, J. V. (1986) Evolutionary processes and patterns of geographic variation in birds. Current Orn. 4: 1–69.Google Scholar
Zino, F. (1991) The Madeira Freira conservation project. World Birdwatch 13(2): 8–9.Google Scholar
Zino, F. and Biscoito, M. (1994) Breeding seabirds in the Madeiran archipelago, Pp. 172–185 in Nettleship, D. N., Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M., eds. Seabirds on islands: threats, case studies and action plans. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conserv. Ser. 1).Google Scholar
Zino, P. A. and Zino, F. (1986) Contribution to the study of the petrels of the genus Pterodroma in the archipelago of Madeira. Bol. Mus. Mun. Funchal 38: 141–165.Google Scholar