Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:44:26.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Breeding abundance and population trend of the Peruvian Diving-petrel Pelecanoides garnotii in Chile: Recovery of an endangered seabird?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2019

CLAUDIA E. FERNÁNDEZ
Affiliation:
Doctorado en Biología y Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo, Chile.
MATÍAS PORTFLITT-TORO
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile. Millenium Nucleus for Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Islands.
DIEGO MIRANDA-URBINA
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Talca, Chile.
PAULA PLAZA
Affiliation:
Doctorado en Biología y Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo, Chile. Millenium Nucleus for Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Islands. Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile.
NICOLAS LUNA
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile. Millenium Nucleus for Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Islands.
GUILLERMO LUNA-JORQUERA*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile. Millenium Nucleus for Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Islands. Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile.
*
*Author for correspondence; e-mail: gluna@ucl.cl

Summary

As island ecosystems are among the most critical breeding habitats for seabirds, their protection should enhance population viability for many species. The Peruvian Diving-petrel Pelecanoides garnotii breeds only in Chile and Perú, is an endangered seabird with historically large populations of over 100,000 breeding pairs, but fewer than 1,000 remained in the 1980s and it became the first endangered seabird of the Humboldt Current System. In Chile, they breed on five islands, three of which are legally protected, but only two have a management plan. Between 2010 and 2014, we evaluated the density of nests, burrow occupancy, and colony patch sizes on the islands to estimate the breeding population. The population trend was assessed by compiling historical data available in the literature and several unpublished technical reports. The current breeding population size in Chile was ∼12,500 breeding pairs (95% CI: 10,613–14,676 pairs) that is ∼34% of the breeding pairs reported for Peru (∼36,450 pairs). Choros Island, the only island with adequate protection, accounted for ∼95% of the total breeding population of the Peruvian Diving-petrel in Chile. Historical population trends showed a significant increase in breeding pairs during recent years on Choros Island. It seems that the adequate legal protection of Choros Island is leading to the recovery of Peruvian Diving-petrels, demonstrating that protection of breeding colonies remains an essential strategy for the conservation of endemic seabirds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© BirdLife International, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araya, B. and Duffy, D. C. (1987) Animal introduction to Isla Chañaral, Chile: Their history and effect on seabirds. Cormorant (South Africa) 15: 36.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (1992) Aves Amenazadas de las Américas (Libro rojo IUCN). Cambridge, UK: Birdlife International.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2019). Species factsheet: Pelecanoides garnotii. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 03 March 2019.Google Scholar
CONAF (2005) Plan Nacional para la conservación del yunco (Pelecanoides garnotii, Lesson 1832) en Chile . Chile: Corporación Nacional Forestal.Google Scholar
Cortés, M. (2007) Ajustes fisiológicos para la nidificación en cuevas: el caso de Pelecanoides garnotii, un enfoque evolutivo. M.Sc. Thesis. Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile.Google Scholar
Cristofari, R., Plaza, P., Fernández, C. E., Trucchi, E., Gouin, N., Le Bohec, C., Zavalaga, C., Alfaro-Shigueto, J. and Luna-Jorquera, G. (2019) Unexpected population fragmentation in an endangered seabird: the case of the Peruvian Diving-petrel. Sci. Rep. 9, 2021.10.1038/s41598-019-38682-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croxall, J. P., Butchart, S. H. M., Lascelles, B., Stattersfield, A. J., Sullivan, B., Symes, A. and Taylor, P. (2012) Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: A global assessment. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 22: 134.10.1017/S0959270912000020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Castri, F. and Hajek, E. R. (1976) Bioclimatología de Chile. Santiago, Chile: Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Donlan, C. J. and Wilcox, C. (2008) Integrating invasive mammal eradications and biodiversity offsets for fisheries bycatch: Conservation opportunities and challenges for seabirds and sea turtles. Biol. Invasions 10: 10531060.10.1007/s10530-007-9183-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaymer, C. F., Stotz, W., Garay-Flühmann, R., Luna-Jorquera, G. and Ramos, M. (2008) Evaluaciones de línea base de las Reservas Marinas “Isla Chañaral” e “Isla Choros-Damas”. Proyecto FIP 2006-56.Google Scholar
Guerra-Correa, C., Guerra-Castro, C. and Paez, J. (2011) Estudio de vigilancia y monitoreo de poblaciones de aves marinas guaníferas y migratorias de la región de Antofagasta. Antofagasta: Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero.Google Scholar
Jahncke, J. and Goya, E. (1998) Biología reproductiva del potoyunco peruano Pelecanoides garnotii en Isla La Vieja, Costa Central ddel Peru. Instituto del Mar del Perú 17: 6774.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. S. and Pachlatko, T. (2012) Footwear to allow researchers to cross densely burrowed terrain without damage to seabird habitat. Mar. Ornithol. 40: 5356.Google Scholar
Knape, J. (2016) Decomposing trends in Swedish bird populations using generalized additive mixed models. J. App. Ecol. 53: 18521861.10.1111/1365-2664.12720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna-Jorquera, G. and Cortés, M. (2007) Estudio del ensamble de aves y mamíferos marinos al interior del Área Marina y Costera Protegida de Múltiples Usos Isla Grande de Atacama. Coquimbo, Chile: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA).Google Scholar
Luna-Jorquera, G., Fernández, C. E. and Rivadeneira, M. M. (2012) Determinants of the diversity of plants, birds and mammals of coastal islands of the Humboldt current systems: implications for conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 21: 1332.10.1007/s10531-011-0157-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna-Jorquera, G., Simeone, A. and Aguilar, R. (2003) Ecofisiología de animales endotermos de un desierto cálido y un mar frío: El caso de las aves marinas de la corriente de Humboldt. Pp. 297316. in Bozinovic, F., ed. Fisiología ecológica & evolutiva. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Mattern, T., Ellenberg, U. and Luna-Jorquera, G. (2002) A south American marine otter Lontra felina preys upon chicks of the Peruvian Diving-petrel Pelecanoides garnotii. Mar. Ornithol. 30: 9596.Google Scholar
Melvin, E. F., Guy, T. J. and Read, L. B. (2013) Reducing seabird bycatch in the South African joint venture tuna fishery using bird-scaring lines, branch line weighting and nighttime setting of hooks. Fish. Res. 147: 7282.10.1016/j.fishres.2013.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, R. C. (1936) Oceanic birds of South America. New York: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (1998) Population limitation in birds. London: Academic Press Limited.Google Scholar
Novoa, J. E. and López, D. (2001) IV región: El escenario geográfico físico. Pp. 1328 in Squeo, F. A., Arancio, G. and Gutiérrez, J. R., eds. Libro rojo de la flora nativa y de los sitios prioritarios para su conservación: región de Coquimbo (Vol. 2). La Serena, Chile: Ediciones Universidad de La Serena.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, A., Holmes, N. D., Ryan, P. G., Wilson, K. J., Faulquier, L., Murillo, Y., Raine, A. F., Penniman, J. F., Neves, V., Rodríguez, B., Negro, J. J., et al. (2017) Seabird mortality induced by land-based artificial lights. Conserv. Biol. 31: 9861001.10.1111/cobi.12900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simeone, A. (1996) Conservación del Pingüino de Humboldt Spheniscus humboldti Meyen 1834 en Chile y situación de algunas colecciones existentes en Zoológicos extranjeros. Bol. Chil. Ornitol. 3: 2530.Google Scholar
Simeone, A. and Luna-Jorquera, G. (2012) Estimating rat predation on Humboldt Penguin colonies in north-central Chile. J. Ornithol. 153: 10791085.10.1007/s10336-012-0837-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simeone, A., Luna-Jorquera, G., Bernal, M., Garthe, S., Sepúlveda, F., Villablanca, R., Ellenberg, U., Contreras, M., Muñoz, J. and Ponce, T. (2003) Breeding distribution and abundance of seabirds on islands off north-central Chile. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 76: 323333.10.4067/S0716-078X2003000200016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squeo, F. A., Arancio, G. and Gutiérrez, J. R. (2008) Libro rojo de la flora nativa y de los sitios prioritarios para su conservación: Región de Atacama. Chile: Ediciones Universidad de La Serena.Google Scholar
Turgis, Y. and Téran, D. (2009) Informe de inspección de nidificación del yunco (Pelecanoides garnotii) en Isla Pan de Azúcar, Parque Nacional Pan de Azúcar. Chile.Google Scholar
Turgis, Y. and Villablanca, R. (2009) Inspección de nidificación del yunco (Pelecanoides garnotii) en Isla Grande de Atacama. Chile.Google Scholar
Vilina, Y., Capella, J., González, J. and Gibbons, J. (1995) Apuntes para la conservación de las aves de la reserva nacional Pingüino de Humboldt. Bol. Chil. Ornitol. 2: 26.Google Scholar
Warham, J. (1990) The petrels: their ecology and breeding systems. New Zealand: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Warham, J. and Wilson, G. J. (1982) The size of sooty shearwater population at the Snares Islands, New Zealand. Notornis 29: 2330.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fernández et al. supplementary material

Fernández et al. supplementary material

Download Fernández et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.5 KB