Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T07:57:32.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slowly but surely: Interpreting facilitates L2 morphological anticipation based on suprasegmental and segmental information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2019

Cristina Lozano-Argüelles Open the ORCID record for Cristina Lozano-Argüelles [Opens in a new window] ,
Nuria Sagarra  and
Joseph V. Casillas Open the ORCID record for Joseph V. Casillas [Opens in a new window]
Cristina Lozano-Argüelles*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Nuria Sagarra
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Joseph V. Casillas
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
*
Address for correspondence: Cristina Lozano-Argüelles, E-mail: cris.lozano@rutgers.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Native speakers use suprasegmental information to predict words, but less is known about segmental information. Moreover, anticipatory studies with non-native speakers are scarce and mix proficiency with anticipatory experience. To address these limitations, we investigated whether Spanish monolinguals and advanced English learners of Spanish use suprasegmentals (stress: oxytone, paroxytone) and segmentals (syllabic structure: CVC, CV) to predict word suffixes, and whether increased anticipatory experience acquired via interpreting will facilitate anticipation in non-interpreting L2 situations. Eye-tracking data revealed that: (1) the three groups made use of the linguistic variables, and L2 groups did not anticipate in CV paroxytones; (2) everybody anticipated better with the less frequent conditions (oxytones, CVC) having fewer lexical competitors; (3) monolinguals anticipated earlier than L2 learners; and (4) interpreters anticipated at a faster rate in some conditions. These findings indicate that less frequent suprasegmental and segmental information and anticipatory experience facilitate native and non-native spoken word prediction.

Keywords

anticipationmorphological processinginterpretinglexical stresssyllabic structuresegmentalssuprasegmentals
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Special Issue 4: Interpreting: A window into bilingual processing , August 2020 , pp. 752 - 762
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, GTM and Kamide, Y (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajo, T, Padilla, F and Padilla, P (2000) Comprehension processes in simultaneous interpreting. In Chesterman A, Gallardo San Salvador N, and Gambier Y (Eds.). Translation in Context. Granada, pp. 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, DJ (2008) Analyzing “visual world” eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, BM and Walker, SC (2009) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 Douglas. Science 325, 883–885.Google Scholar
Boersma, P and Weenink, D (2017) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.33. Retrieved from: <http://www.praat.org/> (26 September, 2017).+(26+September,+2017).>Google Scholar
Bubic, A, Von Cramon, DY and Schubotz, RI (2010) Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in human neuroscience 4, 25.Google ScholarPubMed
Chernov, GV (2004) Inference and anticipation in simultaneous interpreting - A probability prediction (Vol. 57). John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholin, J, Levelt, WJ and Schiller, NO (2006) Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition 99, 205–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colina, S (2009) Spanish phonology: A syllabic perspective. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, N, Cutler, A and Wales, R (2002) Constraints of Lexical Stress on Lexical Access in English: Evidence from Native and Non-native Listeners *. Language and Speech 45, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, MH (1997) Phonetic salience and consonant cluster simplification. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30, 229–262.Google Scholar
de Lacy, P (2006) Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 112. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, GS and Chang, F (2013) The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369, 20120394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K, Urbach, TP and Kutas, M (2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1117–1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, Y and Cai, R (2015) 4 WM and Interpreting: A Commentary on Theoretical Models. In WM in Second Language Acquisition and Processing pp. 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, PE, Valdés Kroff, JR, Guzzardo Tamargo, RE and Gerfen, C (2013) When Gender and Looking Go Hand in Hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, 353–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, TL (2005) Syllable weight and the perception of Spanish stress placement by second language learners. Journal of Language Learning 3, 90–103.Google Scholar
Face, TL (2006) Cognitive factors in the perception of Spanish stress placement: Implications for a model of speech perception. Linguistics 44, 1237–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, KD, McLennan, DB, De Ochoa, E and Kutas, M (2002) The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology 39, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F and Chantavarin, S (2018) Integration and Prediction in Language Processing: A Synthesis of Old and New. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Foucart, A, Ruiz-Tada, E and Costa, A (2016) Anticipation processes in L2 speech comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and lexical recognition task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, AM, Muñoz, E and Kogan, B (2019) Taxing the bilingual mind : Effects of simultaneous interpreting experience on verbal and executive mechanisms *. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–11.Google Scholar
Gile, D (2015) The contributions of cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics to conference interpreting: A critical analysis. In Ferreira, A and Schwieter, JW (eds.), Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 41–64.Google Scholar
Gosselke Berthelsen, S, Horne, M, Brännström, KJ, Shtyrov, Y and Roll, M (2018) Neural processing of morphosyntactic tonal cues in second-language learners. Journal of Neurolinguistics 45, 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T, Lew-Williams, C and Fernald, A (2012) Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research 28, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, U and Bailey, TM (2005) What makes words sound similar?. Cognition 97, 227–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawthorne, K and Gerken, L (2014) From Pauses to Clauses: Prosody Facilitates Learning of Syntactic Constituency. Cognition 133, 420–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, B, and Steriade, D (2004) Introduction: The phonetic basis of phonological markedness. In Hayes, Kirchner, , and Steriade, (eds.). Phonetically-Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervais-Adelman, A, Moser-Mercer, B, Murray, MM and Golestani, N (2017) Cortical thickness increases after simultaneous interpretation training. Neuropsychologia (January), 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Hothorn, T, Bretz, F and Westfall, P (2008) Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models. Biometrical Journal. 50, 346–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopp, H (2016) Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 32, 277–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, JI (2013) Los sonidos del español: Spanish Language edition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F (2015) Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research 1626, 118–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huettig, F and Guerra, E (2019) Effects of speech rate, preview time of visual context, and participant instructions reveal strong limits on prediction in language processing. Brain Research 1706, 196–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huettig, F and McQueen, JM (2007) The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 57, 460–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F, Rommers, J and Meyer, AS (2011) Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica 137, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyman, LM (1975) Phonology: theory and analysis. Harcourt College Pub.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R (1968) Child language: aphasia and phonological universals (No. 72). Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E (2014) Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4, 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y (2008) Anticipatory Processes in Sentence Processing. Linguistics and Language Compass 2, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjelgaard, MM and Speer, SR (1999) Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 153–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukona, A, Fang, SY, Aicher, KA, Chen, H and Magnuson, JS (2011) The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Cognition 119, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperberg, GR and Jaeger, TF (2016) What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31, 32–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurz, I and Färber, B (2003) Anticipation in German-English Simultaneous Interpreting. Forum: Revue Internationale D'interprétation et de Traduction. Forum: International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 1, 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D (2017) Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t-tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lew-Williams, C and Fernald, A (2010) Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 63, 447–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X (2015) Putting interpreting strategies in their place Justifications for teaching strategies in interpreter training. Babel 2, 170–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liontou, K (2012) Anticipation in German to Greek Simultaneous Interpreting: A corpus-based Approach (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://othes.univie.ac.at/23451/Google Scholar
Lord, G (2007) The role of lexicon in learning second language stress patterns. Applied Language Learning 17, 1–14.Google Scholar
Marull, C (2017) Second Language Processing Efficiency : Experience and Cognitive Effects on L2 Morphosyntactic Integration and Anticipation. In BUCLD 41: Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development pp. 466–480.Google Scholar
Martin, CD, Thierry, G, Kuipers, JR, Boutonnet, B, Foucart, A and Costa, A (2013) Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language 69, 574–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D (2016) Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, B (1978) Simultaneous Interpretation: A Hypothetical Model and its Practical Application. In Language interpretation and communication pp. 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, J, Padilla, F, Gomez-Ariza, CJ and Bajo, MT (2015) Simultaneous interpretation selectively influences working memory and attentional networks. Acta Psychologica 155, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, C, Arai, M and Mazuka, R (2012) Immediate use of prosody and context in predicting a syntactic structure. Cognition 125, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieuwland, MS, Politze-Ahles, S, Heyselaar, E, Segaer, K, Bartolozzi, F, Kogan, V, Ito, A, Mézière, D, Barr, DJ, Rousselet, GA, Ferguson, HJ, Busch-Moreno, S, Fu, X, Tuomainen, J, Kulakova, E, Husband, EM, Donaldson, DI, Kohút, Z, Rueschemeyer, S-A and Huettig, F (2018) Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language. ELIFE 7, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, D, Welsh, R, Marschuetz, C, Gutchess, A, Mikels, J, Polk, T, Noll, D and Taylor, S (2003) Working memory for complex scenes: Age differences in frontal and hippocampal activations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15, 1122–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, MJ and Gambi, C (2018) Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin 144, 1002–1044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org/>>Google Scholar
Raab, D (1962) Effect of Stimulus-Duration on Auditory Reaction-Time. The American Journal of Psychology 75, 298–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehrig, GL (2017) Acoustic Correlates of Syntax in Sentence Production and Comprehension. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.Google Scholar
Roll, M (2015) A neurolinguistic study of South Swedish word accents: Electrical brain potentials in nouns and verbs. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, M, Horne, M and Lindgren, M (2010) Word accents and morphology-ERPs of Swedish word processing. Brain Research 1330, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roll, M, Horne, M and Lindgren, M (2011) Activating without Inhibiting: Left-edge Boundary Tones and Syntactic Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, 1170–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roll, M, Söderström, P, Frid, J, Mannfolk, P and Horne, M (2017) Forehearing words: Pre-activation of word endings at word onset. Neuroscience Letters 658, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roll, M, Söderström, P and Horne, M (2013) Word-stem tones cue suffixes in the brain. Brain Research 1520, 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N and Casillas, JV (2018) Suprasegmental information cues morphological anticipation during L1/L2 lexical access. Journal of Second Language Studies 1, 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A, Hed, A, Horne, M and Roll, M (2017) Training predictive L2 processing with a digital game: Prototype promotes acquisition of anticipatory use of tone-suffix associations. Computers & Education 114, 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A, Söderström, P, Horne, M and Roll, M (2016) Implicit acquisition of tone-suffix connections in L2 learners of Swedish. The Mental Lexicon 11, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N, Martí, MA, Carreiras, M and Cuetos, F (2000) LEXESP: Una base de datos informatizada del español. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Seeber, KG and Kerzel, D (2011) Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Model meets data. International Journal of Bilingualism 16, 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P, Roll, M and Horne, M (2012) Processing morphologically conditioned word accents. The Mental Lexicon 7, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P, Horne, M and Roll, M (2015) Using tonal cues to predict inflections. In Proceedings of Fonetik 2015 Lund University, Sweden Using. Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Söderström, P, Horne, M and Roll, M (2017) Stem Tones Pre-activate Suffixes in the Brain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto-Faraco, S, Sebastián-Gallés, N and Cutler, A (2001) Segmental and Suprasegmental Mismatch in Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language 45, 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strobach, T, Becker, M, Schubert, T and Kühn, S (2015) Better dual-task processing in simultaneous interpreters. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Togato, G, Paredes, N, Macizo, P and Bajo, T (2015) Syntactic Processing in Professional Interpreters : Understanding Ambiguous Sentences in Reading and Translation. Applied Linguistics 1–19.Google Scholar
Van Besien, F (1999) Anticipation in Simultaneous Interpretation. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs 44, 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A, Grice, M and Crocker, MW (2006) The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition 99, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wlotko, EW, Lee, CL and Federmeier, KD (2010) Language of the Aging Brain: Event-Related Potential Studies of Comprehension in Older Adults. Linguistics and Language Compass 4, 623–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yudes, C, Mazizo, P, Morales, L and Bajo, MT (2013) Comprehension and error monitoring in simultaneous interpreters. Applied Psycholinguistics 34, 1039–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lozano-Argüelles et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Lozano-Argüelles et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.7 KB