Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:15:10.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting Arabic diglossic switching in light of the MLF model and its sub-models: the 4-M model and the Abstract Level model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2003

NAIMA BOUSSOFARA-OMAR
NAIMA BOUSSOFARA-OMAR
Affiliation:
The University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of this paper is twofold. First, I wish to discuss two sets of problematic cases that arose when I applied Myers-Scotton's (1993) Matrix Language Frame model of codeswitching to Arabic diglossic switching (Boussofara-Omar, 1999). The first set involves the co-occurrence of system morphemes from both varieties of Arabic within a single CP. The second set concerns CPs in which the word order is that of the dialect but the system morphemes are from Standard Arabic, and CPs in which clashes occur between the subcategorization restrictions of the two varieties of Arabic participating in diglossic switching. The Matrix Language Frame model neither predicts nor offers explanations for either case. Second, in an effort to provide an explanation to their occurrence, I revisit the same problematic sets in light of Myers-Scotton's sub-models: the 4-M model and the Abstract Level model (Myers-Scotton and Jake, 2000, 2001), the latest refined version of the MLF model.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 2003 , pp. 33 - 46
Copyright
2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I gratefully acknowledge financial support from the University of Kansas. Thanks go to Keith Walters, Pieter Muysken and especially to the reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper.