Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T14:13:34.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Refining optimum levels of acquisition and L1 semantic influences in the Ontogenesis Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2021

Brent Wolter
Brent Wolter*
Affiliation:
Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA
*
Address for correspondence:Brent Wolter, Email: brentwolter@isu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 234 - 235
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordag, D, Gor, K and Opitz, A (2021) Ontogenesis model of the L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S, Salsbury, T and McNamara, D (2010) The Development of Polysemy and Frequency Use in English Second Language Speakers. Language Learning 60, 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00568.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, JR (1957) ‘A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930-55’ in Studies in Linguistic Analysis, Philosophical Society, Oxford; reprinted in F. Palmer (ed.), Selected Papers of Firth, JR. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Jiang, N (2002) Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102004047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A (2009) Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. In Pavlenko, A (Ed.) The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches. Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters, pp. 125–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, CA and Hart, L (2002) The lexical quality hypothesis, in Verhoeven, L, Elbro, C and Reitsma, P (eds.), Precursors of Functional Literacy-Studies in Written Language and Literacy 11, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N (1998) Tracking the Incremental Acquisition of Second Language Vocabulary: A Longitudinal Study. Language Learning 48, 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B, Yamashita, J and Leung, CY (2020) Conceptual transfer and lexical development in adjectives of space: Evidence from judgments, reaction times, and eye tracking. Applied Psycholinguistics 41, 595–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar