Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Identifying German–English cognates, false cognates, and non-cognates: methodological issues and descriptive norms

  • Brian M. Friel (a1) and Shelia M. Kennison (a1)

Abstract

We investigated 563 German–English nouns for the purposes of identifying cognates, false cognates and non-cognates. Two techniques for identifying cognates were used and compared: (i) De Groot and Nas's (1991) similarity-rating technique and (ii) a translation-elicitation task similar to that of Kroll and Stewart (1994). The results obtained with English-speaking participants produced 112 cognates, 94 false cognates, and 357 non cognates and indicated that the two techniques yielded similar findings. Rated similarity of German–English translation pairs and translation accuracy were positively correlated. We also investigated whether the presence of German-specific characters and the availability of German pronunciation information influenced similarity ratings and translation accuracy. Ratings for translation pairs in which the German word contained a language-specific character were lower and the word was translated less accurately. Participants provided with pronunciation information rated German–English translation pairs as being more similar and translated German words correctly more often than participants who did not receive pronunciation information. We also report the relationships among word frequency, rated imageability and the performance measures. The resulting database of information is intended to be a resource for researchers interested in cognitive processing in German–English bilinguals.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Shelia M. Kennison, Department of Psychology, 215 North Murray, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-3064, USA. E-mail: kenniso@okstate.edu

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Identifying German–English cognates, false cognates, and non-cognates: methodological issues and descriptive norms

  • Brian M. Friel (a1) and Shelia M. Kennison (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.