Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T02:11:03.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does bilingualism improve cognitive aging? Commentary on Virginia Valian's target article: Bilingualism and cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2014

LAURA B. ZAHODNE
Affiliation:
Columbia University Medical Centerlbz2105@cumc.columbia.edu
JENNIFER J. MANLY
Affiliation:
Columbia University Medical Center

Extract

We applaud Valian's (2014) thoughtful analysis of the cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that have thus far contributed to our knowledge about the role of bilingualism in cognitive aging. In evaluating the literature as summarized by Valian, we think it is useful to distinguish between the following four research questions and representative analytic approaches: (1) cross-sectional associations between bilingualism and executive function (e.g., regression), (2) longitudinal associations between bilingualism and change in executive function (e.g., growth curve modeling), (3) bilingualism as a predictor of dementia incidence (e.g., time-to-event analysis), and (4) bilingualism as a source of cognitive reserve (e.g., comparisons of brain pathology between bilinguals and monolinguals matched on cognitive performance).

Type
Peer Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Canadian Study of health and Aging Working Group. (1994). Canadian Study of Health and Aging: study methods and prevalence of dementia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150, 899–913.Google Scholar
Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Arani, K., Nguyen, V., Rhoads, K., McCurry, S. M., Launer, L., Masaki, K., White, L. et al. (2009). Midlife use of written Japanese and protection from late life dementia. Epidemiology, 20, 766774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glymour, M. M., Kawachi, I., Jencks, C. S., & Berkman, L. F. et al. (2008). Does childhood schooling affect old age memory or mental status? Using state schooling laws as natural experiments. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 532537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kavé, G., Eyal, N., Shorek, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2008). Multilingualism and cognitive state in the oldest old. Psychology and Aging, 23, 7079.Google Scholar
Luk, G., Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Grady, C. L. (2011). Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 1680816813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, A. E., Hall, C. B., Katz, M. J., & Lipton, R. B. (2012). Non-native language use and risk of incident dementia in the elderly. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 29, 99108.Google Scholar
Schweizer, T. A., Ware, J., Fischer, C. E., Craik, F. I., & Bialystok, E. et al. (2012). Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 48, 991996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valian, V. (2014). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S1366728914000522.Google Scholar
Yeung, C. M., St. John, P. D., Menec, V., & Tyas, S. L. (in press). Is bilingualism associated with a lower risk of dementia in community-living older adults? Cross-sectional and prospective analyses. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders.Google Scholar
Zahodne, L. B., Glymour, M. M., Sparks, C., Bontempo, D., Dixon, R. A., MacDonald, S. W., & Manly, J. J. et al. (2011). Education does not slow cognitive decline with aging: 12-year evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 10391046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahodne, L. B., Schofield, P. W., Farrell, M., Stern, Y., & Manly, J. J. (2014). Bilingualism does not alter age-related cognitive decline or dementia risk among Spanish-speaking immigrants. Neuropsychology, 28, 238246.Google Scholar