Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:41:07.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Code-switching does not predict Executive Function performance in proficient bilingual children: Bilingualism does

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2018

CARISSA KANG*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
BARBARA LUST
Affiliation:
Cornell University
*
Address for correspondence: Carissa Kang, Department of Human Development, Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853ck577@cornell.edu

Abstract

Previous studies of bilingual adults have suggested that bilinguals’ experience with code-switching (CS) contributes to superior executive function (EF) abilities. We tested a highly bilingual developing population in Singapore, a multilingual country where CS occurs pervasively. We obtained CS and EF measures from 43 English–Chinese 8-year-old children (27 females, M = 100 months). We measured spontaneous CS with a novel task and EF in terms of task-switching (Semantic Fluency) and inhibitory control (Stroop task in both languages). Contrary to previous work, CS performance did not significantly predict EF performance in either case. Rather, bilingual language proficiency, i.e., degree of bilingualism (as measured by direct proficiency tests and parents’ estimates of daily language use and exposure of both languages) influenced EF performance. Accordingly, the relationship between CS and EF may be more indirect and non-necessary than previously assumed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*We thank our undergraduate research assistants at Cornell University – Cynthia Li, Yingxuan Chen and Jing Zheng – for help with reliability checking and transcribing, as well as the parents, school and participants who took part in this study. We also thank Prof. Felix Thoemmes for his consultation on statistical analyses. Finally, we would like to thank the two reviewers for their insightful comments on the paper. This research was supported by grants from the Cornell University Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies, Cornell University Human Development dissertation grant and Cornell University Cognitive Science research grant.

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000299

References

Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. W. (2008). Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 557582.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U. (2009). Contact Languages. Ecology and Evolution in Asia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U. (2010). Identity alignment and language creation in multilingual communities. Language Sciences, 32, 615623.Google Scholar
Baldo, J. V., & Shimamura, A.P. (1998). Letter and category fluency in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychology, 12, 259267.Google Scholar
Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development, 83, 413422.Google Scholar
Blume, M., Flynn, S., & Lust, B. (2012). Creating linked data for the interdisciplinary international collaborative study of language acquisition and use: Achievements and challenges of a new Virtual Linguistics Lab. In Chiarcos, Christian, Nordhoff, Sebastian, and Hellmann, Sebastian (eds.) Linked Data in Linguistics: Representing and Connecting Language Data and Language Metadata, pp. 8596. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Blume, M., & Lust, B. (2016). Experimental Tasks for Generating Language Production Data. In Research methods in language acquisition: Principles, procedures and practices (pp. 119136). Mouton de Gruyter and American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Brice, A., & Anderson, R. (1999) Code mixing in a young bilingual child. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21, 1722.Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491511.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1992). The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 381410.Google Scholar
Davidson, M. C., Amso, A., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 year: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task-switching. Neuropsychologia, 44, 20372078.Google Scholar
Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade & Industry, Republic of Singapore. (2010). Census of population 2010 Statistical Release 1: Demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry. Retrieved from: https://www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/publications/publications_and_papers/cop2010/census_2010_release1/cop2010sr1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual word recognition and lexical access. In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 179201). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, S. (1986). Production vs. comprehension: Differences in underlying competencies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 135164.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Nicoladis, E., & Paradis, J. (1995). Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 22, 611631.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, V. S. (2009). Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 640665.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexicosemantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 6781.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (2011). Language control in different contexts: the behavioral ecology of bilingual speakers. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 103.Google Scholar
Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 515530.Google Scholar
Green, D. W., & Li, W. (2014). A control process model of code-switching. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 499511.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., Indefrey, P., & Muysken, P. (2009). Research techniques for the study of code-switching. In Bullock, B. E., & Toribio, J. A. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook on linguistic code-switching (pp. 2139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gullifer, J. W., Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2013). When language switching has no apparent cost: Lexical access in sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 113.Google Scholar
Gutierrez Ortiz, M.d.M. (2016). Assessing content and language integrated learning: A study of the second language acquisition of English in monolingual Andalusia (Spain). Unpublished Master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Kang, C. (2017). Exploration of code-switching as a mechanism underlying bilingual executive function performance: A study of 8-year-old English–Chinese Singaporean bilingual children. Doctoral thesis. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ID No. 10293).Google Scholar
Kleinman, D., & Gollan, T. H. (2016). Speaking two languages for the price of one: Bypassing language control mechanisms via accessibility-driven switches. Psychological Science, 27, 700714.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J. (2015). A psycholinguistic perspective on code-switching: Lexical, structural, and socio-interactive processes. In Stell, G. & Yakpo, K. (Eds.), Code-switching between structural and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 3964). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S., & Wodniekca, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 119135.Google Scholar
Lee, C. C. P. (2005). The role of code-switching in a communications skills classroom. Unpublished M.A. (Applied Linguistics) thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, J. R. E. (2011). Singapore English. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 4762.Google Scholar
Lust, B., & Chien, Y.-C. (1984). The Structure of Coordination in First Language Acquisition of Chinese: Evidence for a universal. Cognition, 17, 4983.Google Scholar
Lust, B., Flynn, S., & Foley, C. (1996). What children know about what they say: Elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children's syntax. In McDaniel, D., McKee, C. and Cairns, H. S., eds., Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lust, B., Flynn, S., Blume, M., Park, S.W., Kang, C., & Kim, A. (2016). Assessing child bilingualism: Direct assessment of bilingual syntax amends caretaker report. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20, 153172.Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 6, 97115.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., Mizrahi, E., Kania, U., & Cordes, A. – K. (2013). Multilingual Stroop performance: Effects of trilingualism and proficiency on inhibitory control. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10, 82104.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C.M., & MacDonald, P.A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 383391.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. (1994). Code-switching in young bilingual children: The acquisition of grammatical constraints. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 413419.Google Scholar
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 2540.Google Scholar
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134140.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of codemixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E., & Genesee, F. (1997). Language development in preschool bilingual children. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 21, 258270.Google Scholar
Perez-Leroux, A. T., O'Rourke, E., & Gretchen, S. (2014). Language Dominance and Codeswitching Asymmetries. In MacSwan, J. (ed). Grammatical Theory and Bilingual Codeswitching. MIT Press. Pp 283312.Google Scholar
Poarch, G. J., & Van Hell, J. G. (2012). Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: Evidence from second language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 535551.Google Scholar
Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2011). Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 682691.Google Scholar
Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Santisi, M. N., Arecco, M. D. L., Salvatierra, J., Conde, A., & Lenis, B. (2002). Stroop effect in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 819827.Google Scholar
Rubdy, R. (2007). Singlish in school: Impediment or a resource? Journal of Multilingual Matters, 28, 308324.Google Scholar
Soveri, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Laine, M. (2011). Is there a relationship between language switching and executive functions in bilingualism? Introducing a within-group analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 183190.Google Scholar
Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643662.Google Scholar
Tan, Z. L. (2004). Xin jia po hua xiao xue sheng yu ma hun yong ge an yan jiu (A case study of code-mixing among Chinese primary school students in Singapore). Unpublished B.A. (Honors) thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (2015). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 324.Google Scholar
Virtual Linguistics Lab Child Multilingualism Questionnaire(2016). Prepared by the Cornell Language Acquisition Lab and Virtual Center for Language Acquisition Members and Affiliates. In Blume, M., & Lust, B. (eds) with Chien, Y., Dye, C., Foley, C., & Kedar, Y. Research Methods in Language Acquisition: Principles, Procedures and Practices. Mouton de Gruyter and American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Xu, D., Chew, C. H., & Chen, S. (1998). Language use and language attitudes in the Singapore Chinese community. In Gopinathan, S., Pakir, A., Ho, W. K., & Saravanan, V. (Eds.), Language, society and education in Singapore (2nd ed., pp. 133154). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Google Scholar
Yim, O., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Degree of conversational code-switching enhances verbal task switching in Cantonese-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 873883.Google Scholar
Yow, W.Q., & Li, X. (2015). Balanced bilingualism and early age of second language acquisition as the underlying mechanisms of a bilingual executive control advantage: Why variations in bilingual experiences matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 164.Google Scholar
Yow, W. Q., Patrycia, F., & Flynn, S. (2016). Code-switching in Childhood. In S. Montarnari & E. Nicoladis (eds). Lifespan Perspectives on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Yow, W. Q., Tan, J. S. H., & Flynn, S. (2017). Code-switching as a marker of linguistic competence in bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, First View article.Google Scholar
Zied, K.M., Philippe, A., Pinon, K., Havet-Thomassin, V., Ghislaine, A., Roy, A., & Le Gall, D. (2004). Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: Evidence from a bilingual Stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 54, 254256.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kang and Lust supplementary material 1

Kang and Lust supplementary material

Download Kang and Lust supplementary material 1(File)
File 565.5 KB