Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T21:57:42.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavioral public strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2020

BERT GEORGE*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Governance and Management, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
*
*Correspondence to: Department of Public Governance and Management, Ghent University, Henleykaai 84, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Email: bert.george@ugent.be

Abstract

How can we stimulate policymakers to make strategic decisions that enhance public service performance? Traditional strategy theories have not enabled us to answer this question. These theories focus on strategy processes or content in public organizations and networks and directly link these to public service performance. This article defines and elaborates on a conceptual framework that uses theory from behavioral science to unravel how policymakers can make strategic decisions that actually enhance the performance of public organizations and networks. This conceptual framework is labeled ‘behavioral public strategy’ and conceptualizes public strategy as a social process shaped by the individuals, teams and tools underlying it. Behavioral public strategy thus focuses on the micro-foundations of public strategy and how these micro-foundations influence strategic decisions. Moreover, behavioral public strategy links meso- and micro-levels by proposing a bathtub model where the relationship between public strategy and public service performance at the organizational and network levels is explained by the relationship between the micro-foundations of public strategy and the ensuing strategic decisions at the individual and team levels. This article connects three research streams that have been like ‘ships that pass in the night’, namely public strategy, behavioral public policy and behavioral public administration.

Type
New Voices
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A. and Walker, R. M. (2006), ‘Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis’, Public Administration Review, 66(1): 5263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brorström, S. (2019), ‘The strategy process as a result of learning, questioning, and performing in a city organization’, International Public Management Journal, DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2019.1606127.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. (2007), The consequences of decision-making, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M. (2018), Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M. and George, B. (2020), ‘Strategic management in public administration’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. (2016), ‘Discovering collaborative advantage: The contributions of goal categories and visual strategy mapping’, Public Administration Review, 76(6): 912925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, J. M., Berry, F. S. and Yang, K. (2010), ‘The state of public strategic management research: A selective literature review and set of future directions’, The American Review of Public Administration, 40(5): 495521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, J., Dahlmann, C. M., Mathiasen, A. H., Moynihan, D. P. and Petersen, N. P. G. (2018), ‘How do elected officials evaluate performance? Goal preferences, governance preferences, and the process of goal reprioritization’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2): 197211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmidt, S., Meyfroodt, K. and George, B. (2018), ‘Shared strategic cognition in Flemish city councils: the relevance of political and demographic group characteristics’, Public Management Review, Early view. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1538423.Google Scholar
Ferlie, E. and Ongaro, E. (2015), Strategic management in public sector organizations: concepts, schools, and contemporary issues, New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, L. (2013), Strategy: a history, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaddis, J. L. (2018), On grand strategy, New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
George, B. (2020), ‘Successful strategic plan implementation in public organizations: connecting people, process, and plan (3Ps)’, Public Administration Review, DOI: 10.1111/puar.13187.Google Scholar
George, B. and Desmidt, S. (2014), ‘A state of research on strategic management in the public sector: an analysis of the empirical evidence’, in Joyce, P. and Drumaux, A. (eds), Strategic management in public organizations: European practices and perspectives, New York: Routledge, 151–72.Google Scholar
George, B. and Desmidt, S. (2018), ‘Strategic-decision quality in public organizations: An information processing perspective’, Administration & Society, 50(1): 131156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, B., Baekgaard, M., Decramer, A., Audenaert, M. and Goeminne, S. (2018a), ‘Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: a survey experiment’, Public Administration, Early view. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12390Google Scholar
George, B., Desmidt, S., Cools, E. and Prinzie, A. (2018b), ‘Cognitive styles, user acceptance and commitment to strategic plans: an empirical analysis’, Public Management Review, 20(3): 340359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, B., Walker, R. M. and Monster, J. (2020), ‘Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta-analysis’, Public Administration Review, 79(6): 810819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L. and Tummers, L. (2017), ‘Behavioral Public Administration: combining insights from public administration and psychology’, Public Administration Review, 77(1): 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grissom, J. A. (2014), ‘Is discord detrimental? Using institutional variation to identify the impact of public governing board conflict on outcomes’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2): 289315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. R. (2011), ‘Application of strategic management tools after an NPM-inspired reform: strategy as practice in Danish schools’, Administration & Society, 43(7): 770806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höglund, L., Caicedo, M. H., Mårtensson, M. and Svärdsten, F. (2018), ‘Strategic management in the public sector: how tools enable and constrain strategy making’, International Public Management Journal, 21(5): 822849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, A. P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1): 6995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, Å. (2018), ‘Impacts of strategic planning and management in municipal government: an analysis of subjective survey and objective production and efficiency measures in Norway’, Public Management Review, 20(3): 397420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, fast and slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J. and Steijn, B. (2010), ‘Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes’, Administration & Society, 42(2): 193221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, A. (2014), ‘Why performance information use varies among public managers: testing manager-related explanations’, International Public Management Journal, 17(2): 174201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovallo, D. and Sibony, O. (2010), ‘The case for behavioral strategy’, McKinsey Quarterly, 2(1): 3043.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1978), ‘Patterns in strategy formation’, Management Science, 24(9): 934948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. H. (1995), Creating public value: strategic management in government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, P. A. and Baekgaard, M. (2015), ‘Performance information, blame avoidance, and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: Evidence from an experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2): 545569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, A. (2013), Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opstrup, N. and Villadsen, A. R. (2015), ‘The right mix? Gender diversity in top management teams and financial performance’, Public Administration Review, 75(2): 291301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poister, T. H. (2010), ‘The future of strategic planning in the public sector: linking strategic management and performance’, Public Administration Review, 70(1): s246-s254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poister, T. H., Pitts, D. W. and Edwards, L. H. (2010), ‘Strategic management research in the public sector: a review, synthesis, and future directions’, American Review of Public Administration, 40(5): 522545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiki, S., Kim, J. and Leach, W. D. (2017), ‘Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance’, Public Administration Review, 77(6): 863874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, P. A. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2011), ‘Strategic planning as communicative process’, Organization Studies, 32(9): 12171245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stazyk, E. C. and Davis, R. S. (2015), ‘Taking the ‘high road’: Does public service motivation alter ethical decision making processes?’, Public Administration, 93(3): 627645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vining, A. R. (2011), ‘Public agency external analysis using a modified “five forces” framework’, International Public Management Journal, 14(1): 63105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M. (2013), ‘Strategic management and performance in public organizations: findings from the Miles and Snow framework’, Public Administration Review, 73(5): 675685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M. and Andrews, R. (2015), ‘Local government management and performance: a review of evidence’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1): 101133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A. and Brewer, G. A. (2010), Public management and performance: research directions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warsen, R., Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. (2019), ‘Mix and match: how contractual and relational conditions are combined in successful public–private partnerships’, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 29(3): 375393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (1996), ‘Strategy as practice’, Long Range Planning, 29(5): 731735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar