Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T10:56:16.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unresolved Issues Regarding Collaborative Empiricism in Cognitive and Behavioural Therapies: An Expert Panel Discussion at AACBT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2013

Nikolaos Kazantzis*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Research Unit, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
Arthur Freeman
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychology Department, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL and Glendale, AZ
Alan E. Fruzzetti
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA
Jacqueline B. Persons
Affiliation:
San Francisco Bay Area Center for Cognitive Therapy, San Francisco, California, USA
Mervin Smucker
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Nikolaos Kazantzis, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Research Unit, School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University VIC 3086, Australia. Email: N.Kazantzis@latrobe.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This article presents a panel discussion on the development of collaborative empiricism in cognitive behaviour therapy. The panel comprised experts in research and practice who had been invited as keynote presenters for the 33rd National Conference for the Australian Association of Cognitive and Behaviour Therapy. Experts responded to questions about the definition of collaborative empiricism, how this specific relationship construct facilitates meaningful therapeutic changes, and their discussion conveyed the importance of collaborative empiricism for effective therapy. The dialogue included suggestions and strategies for developing therapeutic relationships strong in collaboration and empiricism.

Type
Standard Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, L.Y., Alloy, L.B., & Dykman, B.M. (1990). Cognitive theory and therapy of emotional disorders: A lay epistemic reconstruction? Psychological Inquiry, 1, 198200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A.T. (1970). Cognitive therapy: Nature and relation to behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 1, 184200.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R.L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Rush, A.J., Shaw, B.F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Beck, J.S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Beck, J.S. (2011). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Beck, J.S. (2005). Cognitive therapy with challenging problems: What to do when the basics don't work. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bell, V., Grech, E., Maiden, C., Halligan, P.W., & Ellis, H.D. (2005). ‘Internet delusions’: A case series and theoretical integration. Psychopathology, 38, 144150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordin, E. (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In Horvath, A.O. & Greenberg, L.S. (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1337). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dattilio, F.M., & Hanna, M.A. (2012). Collaboration in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 146158. doi:10.1002/jclp.21831.Google Scholar
Dattilio, F.M., & Padesky, C.A. (1990). Cognitive therapy with couples. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.Google Scholar
Hollon, S.D., & Beck, A.T. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. In Kendall, P.C. & Hollon, S.D. (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures (pp. 153203). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horvath, A.O., & Greenberg, L.S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223233.Google Scholar
Horvath, A.O., & Greenberg, L.S. (1994). The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kazantzis, N., Deane, F.P., Ronan, K.R., & L'Abate, L. (2005). Using homework assignments in cognitive behavior therapy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, W.M. (2009). Collaborative helping: A practice framework for family-centered services. Family Process, 48, 103116.Google Scholar
Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Persons, J.B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2008). A self-determination approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology, 49, 186193.Google Scholar
Ryan, R.M., Lynch, M.F., Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E.L. (2011). Motivation and autonomy in counseling, psychotherapy, and behavior change: A look at theory and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 193260.Google Scholar
Scott, J., & Freeman, A. (2010). Beck's cognitive therapy. In Kazantzis, N., Reinecke, M.A., & Freeman, A. (Eds.), Cognitive and behavioural theories in clinical practice (pp. 2875). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Tee, J.M., & Kazantzis, N. (2011). Collaborative empiricism in cognitive therapy: A definition and theory for the relationship construct. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18, 4761.Google Scholar
Tryon, W.W., & Misurell, J.R. (2008). Dissonance induction and reduction: A possible principle and connectionist mechanism for why therapies are effective. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 12971309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkes, T. (1994). Cognitive therapy for depressed adolescents. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar