Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T21:04:16.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicting Testicular and Breast Self-examination Behaviour: A test of the Theory of Reasoned Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Susan M. Moore ,
Norman R. Barling  and
Bernadette Hood
Susan M. Moore*
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Technology
Norman R. Barling
Affiliation:
Bond University
Bernadette Hood
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Technology
*
Department of Psychology, Victoria University of Technology, PO Box 14428 MMC, Melbourne VIC 8001, Australia. E-mail: susanmoore@vut.edu.au
Get access

Extract

One aim of this study was to describe attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours concerned with testicular and breast self-examination (TSE, BSE); the second was to test the efficacy of the Ajzen and Fishbein theory of reasoned action in predicting self-examination behaviour. Participants comprised 116 male adults with a mean age of 27.9, and 141 female adults with a mean age of 30.0 years. The sample was relatively well-educated, with over half having engaged in some tertiary studies. They completed a questionnaire assessing self-examination behaviours, intentions, beliefs, attitudes, and perceived norms. Results indicated low rates of self-examination for both TSE and BSE. Barriers to self-examination included embarrassment, perceived unpleasantness and difficulty, concern about reliability, and worries about what the tests might reveal. Respondents perceived only moderate levels of support from salient others for engaging in the self-examinations. The theory of reasoned action was strongly supported by the study, with intentions to perform self-examination being predicted by attitudes and subjective norms, and intentions in turn predicting self-examination behaviours.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 41 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
American Cancer Society. (1985). Cancer facts and figures. New York: Author.Google Scholar
American Cancer Society. (1991). Cancer facts and figures – 1991. Atlanta, GA: Author.Google Scholar
Champion, V. (1992). Relationship of age to factors influencing breast self-examination practice. Health Care for Women International, 13, 1–9.Google Scholar
Clarke, V., Hill, D., Rassaby, J., White, V., & Hirst, S. (1991). Determinants of continued breast self-exam practice in women 40 years and over. Health Education Research, 6, 297–306.Google Scholar
Friman, P.C., & Finney, J.W. (1990). Health education for testicular cancer. Health Education Quarterly, 17, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grady, K.E. (1984). Cue enhancement and the long-term practice of breast self-examination. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 7, 191–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lierman, L., Kasprzyk, D., & Benoliel, J. (1991). Understanding adherence to breast self-examination in older women. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 13, 46–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCaul, K.Sandgren, A., O'Neill, H., & Hinsz, V. (1993). The value of the theory of planned behavior, perceived control, and self-efficacy for predicting health protective behaviors. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 231–252.Google Scholar
McMichael, A., & Armstrong, B. (1991). Breast cancer in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 154, 218–9.Google Scholar
Millar, M., & Millar, K. (1992). Feelings and beliefs about breast cancer and breast self-examination among women in three age groups. Community Health, 15, 30–37.Google Scholar
Millar, M., & Millar, K. (1993). Changing breast self-examination attitudes: Influences of repression-sensitization and attitude-message match. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Cancer Institute. (1985). Research report: Progress in treatment of testicular cancer (NIH Publication #85-6454). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Neef, N., Scutchfield, F.D., Elder, J., & Bender, S.J. (1991). Testicular self-examination by young men: An analysis of characteristics associated with practice. Journal of American College Health, 39, 187–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redman, S., Reid, A.L.A., Campbell, E., & Sanson-Fischer, R.W. (1990). Breast self-examination and breast examination by a health care provider: Prevalence and predictors of screening in a randomly selected sample of Australian women. The Medical Journal of Australia, 152, 640–646.Google Scholar
Reno, D.R. (1988). Men's knowledge and health beliefs about testicular cancer and testicular self-examination. Cancer Nursing, 11, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salazar, M., & Carter, W. (1993). Evaluation of breast self-examination beliefs using a decision model. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 403–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sladden, M., & Dickinson, J. (1993). Testicular cancer: How effective is screening? Australian Family Physician, 22, 1350–1357.Google Scholar
Wardle, J., Steptoe, A., Burckhardt, R., & Vogele, C. (1994). Testicular self-examination: Attitudes and practices among young men in Europe. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 23, 206–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed