Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T17:39:57.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Competitive Orientation on the Ability and Effort Attributions of Racquetball Players

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Kevin S. Spink
Kevin S. Spink*
Affiliation:
Footscray Institute of Technology
*
Department of Physical Education & Recreation, Footscray Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 64, Footscray, Victoria, 3011.
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different goal structures on the attributional patterns of individuals involved in a sport situation. One hundred and fifty-eight male subjects played in one of two types of racquetball tournament. In the competitive tournament, the goal was to win as many games as possible, whereas in the mastery tournament the goal was to do one's best. Analyses revealed that individuals in the competitive condition tended to focus more on ability attributions than did individuals in the mastery condition. The implications of these findings for the sport practitioner are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 94 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ames, C. (1984). Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 478–487.Google Scholar
Ames, C., Ames, R., & Felker, D. (1977). Effects of competitive reward structure and valence of outcome on children's achievement attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 1–8.Google Scholar
Covington, M., & Berry, R. (1976). Self-worth and school learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674–685.Google Scholar
Dweck, C.S., & Goetz, T.E. (1978). Attributions and learned helplessness. In Harvey, J., Ickes, W., & Kidd, R. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research. (Vol. 11). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dweck, C.S., & Reppucci, N.D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 109–116.Google Scholar
Feldman, R., & Ruble, D. (1977). Awareness of social comparison interest and motivations: A developmental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 579–585.Google Scholar
Martens, R., Christina, R.W., Harvey, J.S., & Sharkey, B.J. (1981). Coaching young athletes. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
McAuley, E. (1985). Success and causality in sport: The influence of perception. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 13–22.Google Scholar
Nicholls, J.G. (1979). Quality and equality in intellectual development: The role of motivation in education. American Psychologist, 34, 1071–1084.Google Scholar
Nicholls, J.G. (1984). Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation. In Ames, R. & Ames, C. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Orlick, T. (1974). The athletic dropout: A high price for inefficiency. Canadian Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation Journal, 1, 21–27.Google Scholar
Roberts, G.C. (1984). Toward a new theory of motivation in sport: The role of perceived ability. In Silva, J.M. & Weinberg, R.S. (Eds.), Psychological foundations of sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
Roberts, G.C., Kleiber, D.A., & Duda, J.L. (1981). An analysis of motivation in children's sport: The role of perceived competence in participation. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 206–216.Google Scholar
Spink, K.S. (1984). On understanding the relationship between self-confidence and sports performance: Implications for coaches and physical educators. Paper presented at ACHPER Conference, Sydney, NSW.Google Scholar
Spink, K.S., & Maehr, M.L. (1986). Contingent and non-contingent conditions, task meaning and continuing motivation. The Australian Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport. 18, 22–26.Google Scholar
Spink, K.S., & Roberts, G.C. (1980). Ambiguity of outcome and causal attributions. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar