Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T14:08:38.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Where does the elephant come from? The evolution of causal cognition is the key

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2020

Peter Gärdenfors
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, LUX, Lund University, S-221 00Lund, Sweden. Peter.Gardenfors@lucs.lu.sehttp://www.ht.lu.se/en/person/PeterGardenfors/ Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. mlombard@uj.ac.zahttps://www.uj.ac.za/contact/Pages/Marlize-Lombard.aspx Stellenbosch Institute of Advanced Study, Stellenbosch7600, South Africa
Anders Högberg
Affiliation:
Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. mlombard@uj.ac.zahttps://www.uj.ac.za/contact/Pages/Marlize-Lombard.aspx Stellenbosch Institute of Advanced Study, Stellenbosch7600, South Africa Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Linnaeus University, 391 82 Kalmar, Sweden. Anders.Hogberg@lnu.sehttps://lnu.se/en/staff/anders.hogberg/
Marlize Lombard
Affiliation:
Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. mlombard@uj.ac.zahttps://www.uj.ac.za/contact/Pages/Marlize-Lombard.aspx Stellenbosch Institute of Advanced Study, Stellenbosch7600, South Africa

Abstract

Osiurak and Reynaud do not explain the evolutionary emergence and development of the elephant in the room, that is, technical cognition. We first argue that there is a tight correlation between the evolution of cumulative technological culture (CTC) and the evolution of reasoning about abstract forces. Second, intentional teaching plays a greater role in CTC evolution than acknowledged in the target article.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbib, M. A., Bonaiuto, J. B., Jacobs, S. & Frey, S. H. (2009) Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector. Psychological Research 73:441–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, H. C., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2007) The hominid entry into the cognitive niche. In: Evolution of mind, fundamental questions and controversies, eds. Gangestad, S. W. & Simpson, J. A., pp. 241–48. The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J. & Henrich, J. (2011) The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(Suppl. 2):10918–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100290108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, E. & Lozano Ruiz, M. (2014) Extended mind and visuo-spatial integration: Three hands for the Neandertal lineage. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 92:273–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2001) Unravelling the enigma of human intelligence: Evolutionary psychology and the multimodular mind. In: The evolution of intelligence, eds. Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C., pp. 53115. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Derex, M., Bonnefon, J. F., Boyd, R. & Mesoudi, A. (2019) Causal understanding is not necessary for the improvement of culturally evolving technology. Nature Human Behaviour 3:446–52. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0567-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Errico, F. & Banks, W. E. (2015) The archaeology of teaching: A conceptual framework. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 25(4):859–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. & Högberg, A. (2017) The archaeology of teaching and the evolution of Homo docens. Current Anthropology 58(2):188208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. & Lombard, M. (2018) Causal cognition, force dynamics and early hunting technologies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 February, 2018. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, M. A. (2015) How to learn about teaching: An evolutionary framework for the study of teaching behavior in humans and other animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38:170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombard, M. & Gärdenfors, P. (2017) Tracking the evolution of causal cognition in humans. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 95:118.Google ScholarPubMed
Lombard, M., Högberg, A. & Haidle, M. N. (2019) Cognition: From Capuchin rock pounding to Lomekwian flake production. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 29(2):201–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maravita, A. & Iriki, A. (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:7986. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, D. C. & Povinelli, D. J. (2007) Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: A comparative, critical review. Annual Review of Psychology 58:97118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (2010) The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 107(Suppl. 2):8993–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riede, F., Johannsen, N. N., Högberg, A., Nowell, A. & Lombard, M. (2018) The role of play objects and object play in human cognitive evolution and innovation. Evolutionary Anthropology 27:4659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, J. J. (2017) Occasional, obligatory, and habitual stone tool use in hominin evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart-Fox, M. (2014) The origins of causal cognition in early hominins. Biology and Philosophy 30:247–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilhāo, J. (2019) Commentary. Tar adhesives, Neanderthals, and the tyranny of the discontinuous mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916116116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed