Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:43:45.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral externalisation fails to scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2018

Carl Joseph Brusse Open the ORCID record for Carl Joseph Brusse [Opens in a new window]  and
Kim Sterelny
Carl Joseph Brusse
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, RSSS, CASS, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia. Carl.brusse@anu.edu.auKim.sterelny@anu.edu.auhttps://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/sterelny-k
Kim Sterelny
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, RSSS, CASS, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia. Carl.brusse@anu.edu.auKim.sterelny@anu.edu.auhttps://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/sterelny-k
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that Stanford's picture of the evolution of externalised norms is plausible mostly because of the idealisations implicit in his defence of it. Once we take into account plausible amounts of normative disagreement, plausible amounts of error and misunderstanding, and the knock-on consequences of shunning, it is plausible that Stanford under-counts the costs of externalisation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frank, R. H. (1988) Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar