No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Externalization of moral demands does not motivate exclusion of non-cooperators: A defense of a subjectivist moral psychology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2018
Abstract
It is not clear how a moral demand alone can motivate an agent to exclude those who fail to act as the demand states. A more plausible hypothesis for the evolution of human moral cognition is based on seeing moral demands as subjective, but inherently conjunctive. This subjectivist-conjunctive proposal can still account for the apparent externalization of moral demands.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
Goodwin, G. P. & Darley, J. M. (2008) The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition 106:1339–66. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007.Google Scholar
Schulz, A. (2011) The adaptive importance of cognitive efficiency: An alternative theory of why we have beliefs and desires. Biology and Philosophy 26(1):31–50.Google Scholar
Schulz, A. (2013) The benefits of rule following: A new account of the evolution of desires. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44(4, Part A):595–603.Google Scholar
Schulz, A. (2018) Efficient cognition: The evolution of representational decision making. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2004) The Stag Hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. & Wilson, D. S. (1998) Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2003) Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Target article
The difference between ice cream and Nazis: Moral externalization and the evolution of human cooperation
Related commentaries (23)
A cognitive, non-selectionist account of moral externalism
Coordination, conflict, and externalization
Disgust as a mechanism for externalization: Coordination and disassociation
Do the folk need a meta-ethics?
Do we really externalize or objectivize moral demands?
Externalization is common to all value judgments, and norms are motivating because of their intersubjective grounding
Externalization of moral demands does not motivate exclusion of non-cooperators: A defense of a subjectivist moral psychology
From objectivized morality to objective morality
Generalization and the experience of obligations as externally imposed: Distinct contributors to the evolution of human cooperation
Green beards and signaling: Why morality is not indispensable
How does moral objectification lead to correlated interactions?
Is all morality or just prosociality externalized?
Moral cues from ordinary behaviour
Moral demands truly are externally imposed
Moral externalisation fails to scale
Moral externalization is an implausible mechanism for cooperation, let alone “hypercooperation”
Moral externalization may precede, not follow, subjective preferences
Moralization of preferences and conventions and the dynamics of tribal formation
Norms, not moral norms: The boundaries of morality do not matter
Not as distinct as you think: Reasons to doubt that morality comprises a unified and objective conceptual category
The brighter the light, the deeper the shadow: Morality also fuels aggression, conflict, and violence
The difference between the scope of a norm and its apparent source
The objectivity of moral norms is a top-down cultural construct
Author response
Moral externalization and normativity: The errors of our ways